![]() |
Originally Posted by kansas
(Post 590796)
That's the key. Hate. We need to hate companies and people. Especially when they make money. Good idea. I'm ready for a thread lock on this one.
|
This post will at least prove one point:
You cannot have a battle of intelligence with the unarmed. |
Originally Posted by Pontius Pilot
(Post 590834)
This post will at least prove one point:
You cannot have a battle of intelligence with the unarmed. |
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 590816)
You have compeltely missed the point of that entire post, please read it again. He said he hates me wasting my mind, stop trying to twist around what I really said.
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 590728)
You ought to save up all that hate you have for something more important to the world, like hating the corporations that pay thier workers $1.40 a day to make your Nikes and sell them to you for $90. Think about that a minute before you start hating the way I have wasted my mind.
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 589640)
While making money off the programs gets people involved, I think it is more important that we all simply choose to do the right and responsible thing. We shouldn't have to pay people to be good members of society, but if thats what it takes at first, it may be worth it.
Regardless, I still think this is a good thread, and I do gladly recycle, though I'm a long way from as "into it" as others may be. For the most part, it seems to be a noble cause that I will help out with, as long as it is efficient to do so (i.e. I won't recycle if we end up burning 5 gallons of gas to save 4, etc.). |
Originally Posted by Pontius Pilot
(Post 590834)
This post will at least prove one point:
You cannot have a battle of intelligence with the unarmed. |
Originally Posted by kansas
(Post 590852)
No twisting here. I have re-posted your quotes below just so we are all on the same page. I did not miss the point of your post, which seems to be that the other poster's negative energy should be used more productively. Perhaps I'm wrong, so let me know if I've mis-interpreted.
Bringing up hate for Nike doesn't seem to fit in to this picture. What good does hate do at all? Are you saying that it is ok to hate the right companies/people? I hope not. Perhaps there is a general disdain for private wealth as both of these posts seem to allude to. Or maybe I'm way off the mark again. Regardless, I still think this is a good thread, and I do gladly recycle, though I'm a long way from as "into it" as others may be. For the most part, it seems to be a noble cause that I will help out with, as long as it is efficient to do so (i.e. I won't recycle if we end up burning 5 gallons of gas to save 4, etc.). I have nothing against private wealth, or rich people. I just think a responsible company would treat their workers in other countries with the same rights that American citizens would get stateside. |
Well to answer the original poster's question, yes my airline recycles. According to the latest edition of Delta's Sky Magazine 1,263,311 pounds of plastic, aluminum and paper from Delta flights were recycled and diverted from local landfills last year. This resulted in $85,749 going to Delta's Force for Global Good and Habitat for Humanity for the construction of a Habitat for Humanity home in 2009. This can all be found on deltaskymag.com in the April edition.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 590886)
Well to answer the original poster's question, yes my airline recycles. According to the latest edition of Delta's Sky Magazine 1,263,311 pounds of plastic, aluminum and paper from Delta flights were recycled and diverted from local landfills last year. This resulted in $85,749 going to Delta's Force for Global Good and Habitat for Humanity for the construction of a Habitat for Humanity home in 2009. This can all be found on deltaskymag.com in the April edition.
|
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 590891)
Excellent post, this is the information I was looking for.
Glad you enjoyed it.:) I think it's the only answer you got in 5 pages of posts.;) |
Originally Posted by Pontius Pilot
(Post 590834)
This post will at least prove one point:
You cannot have a battle of intelligence with the unarmed. There is a fine line between telling the difference between actual scientific evidence and agenda being propagated by agenda-driven environmental scientists. The ability to see that line is directly proportional to the amount of education a person has on the subject. Personally, I believe the evidence is telling us the earth and climate are fine and thus I am doing anything in the name of the environmentalism/climate change/global warming. Do I recycle? Not really. For me to do so would require me to sort through my garbage, separate it, and then drive it to a recycling center. It's more convenient to toss everything away. Besides, we're not going to overfill the landfills, raise the earth's temperature and melt the polar ice caps by not recycling. Would I recycle if the refuse company provided us with recycling bins and pick-up? It depends. If people continue to claim to know what the "right thing" is and then chastise those who don't participate then the answer is no. If it costs me any more money than what I'm already paying the refuse company the answer is no. And one more piece of advice. If you want to win people over to your side of the argument, a good start would be to drop the name-calling and labeling. You'll catch more bees with honey than you will with vinegar. :) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands