Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today >

Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2009, 09:43 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha View Post
Give me a break.
What's does a chip detector do again.. oh ya, it detects chips just like the name implies.
Give the guy a break. He just lost his wife. Of course he is going to say that she was head and shoulders above everyone else. It is obvious they BOTH screwed up badly and neither were head and shoulders above anyone else.
selcal is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:44 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OldSF3Dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: O-2 pilot
Posts: 123
Default

I agree with having a ATP being the minimum requirement to fly for the airlines. It makes sense for safety. I also think it would drive up first officer pay. It's supply and demand. How many guys with ATPs are available for the airlines to hire vs guys with 250 hours? Once the airlines get hiring again I think they would have to raise pay to compete for new hires with ATPs.

When I was a new hire in 1998 the average new hire had 1000-2000 hours and had lots of previous experience flight instructing, flying charter, flying checks, etc. When I was a new hire again in 2008 the average new hire had 300 hours and had just got out of flight school and (maybe) had done a very short stint as an instructor at his school. There were a few outliers (me, a couple military guys, a charter guy), but the vast majority recently seem to be in the 250-500 hour niehborhood.

Of course, I'm sure I'm biased in my opinion.
OldSF3Dude is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:49 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rickB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: HS125
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha View Post
Give me a break.
What's does a chip detector do again.. oh ya, it detects chips just like the name implies.
What is with you people just ripping on the dumbest things. That isn't even the reason the plane went down. Yes, they messed up, however I feel that just because you have a load of flight time isn't always going to make you the best and the brightest. It all depends on the individual.
rickB is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:56 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Quote: "When I was hired at my airline 23 years ago, I had nearly the flying time of both the captain and the first officer of the Buffalo flight combined. That was the norm then. Because of dramatic reductions in compensation over the past 10 years, airline careers are no longer attractive to the best and the brightest."

I agree with almost everything he said but the above statement isn’t comparing apples to apples. 99.9% of the pilot’s hired both during his time 23 years ago and even today (or 2 years ago) at mainline have more flying time than both Colgan pilots when hired. Remember that he’s comparing the hiring practices of US Air to regional airlines. Look at the hiring practices of regional 23 years ago and you’ll see flight times comparable to the FO’s.

I completely agree that an ATP should be a min requirement to obtain an airline pilot job.

I’m also sick of being calling "not the best and brightest" or “untalented” or “not the cream of the crop.” I have 2 degrees, graduated college magna cum laude while playing division I college tennis, I have a very successful business history, this is a second career for me, I started flying long before I turned 10 and I grew up in aviation with both my father and uncle being former MIL and Mainline pilots plus I have NEVER failed a check ride or stage check. I think I and many other “regional” pilots deserve more.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:11 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 652
Default

I think that FO Skiles letter was great. He hit on some points that needed to be said.
Airbum is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:12 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoBeta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: autopilot abuser
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by TurboDog View Post
I agree with this letter. While I agree with it, I think the change needs to start at the flight schools. You shouldn't be able to leave a flight school as a student with less than 250 hours. 141 Training schools should have students graduating with near 500 hours. Then going on to instruct or whatever to get experience. Getting hired at an airline though should be closer to 2000 hours.

No offense but do you have any clue what it costs to rent a single or multi nowadays??? Try 250 to 350 per hour for a multi with an instructor.
NoBeta is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:29 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,082
Default

While I too agree everyone once online at any airline should have the ATP with PIC type, I must wonder about his comment of everyone at USair having one.... Isn't almost everyone at USair (at least the "easties" where these guys flew) either a current or former USair captain thanks to the way that company has gone in the past 10 years or so? I mean if he's been there for 20+ years and is still a A320 FO then why hasn't he upgraded to captain? This assuming he wasn't at one point and is a downgrade there.

Next point, isn't about 99.5% of all major airline pilots ATP's? And the few that aren't came from the military where they have to perform a paperwork exercise to actually get their earned type ratings and ATP in the civilian world?
Avroman is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:44 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,610
Default

The guy who said this:

"My FAA-issued pilot's license does not say "regional flying only." It has my name with a picture of Wilbur and Orville Wright on the back. My point is that you can trust the U.S. airline system. Don't think lowest bidder. Think leanest operator with the sharpest management team.

So go online, search for that lowest fare and keep flying. It's a wonderful and safe world out there."

definitely loses me in his last few sentences. Don't get me wrong...Im not going to drive my aircraft into the ground just because Im paid poorly. But give me a break with the "leanest operator with sharpest management" BS.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:45 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

I've never understood how an 'airline pilot' as recognized by industry never had to be an 'Airline Transport Pilot' as recognized by the FAA.

The FAR's are written in blood. The only question is, has enough blood be spilled yet to compel the FAA to act?

Well said, CA Skiles!
Sniper is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:50 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
I've never understood how an 'airline pilot' as recognized by industry never had to be an 'Airline Transport Pilot' as recognized by the FAA.

The FAR's are written in blood. The only question is, has enough blood be spilled yet to compel the FAA to act?

Well said, CA Skiles!
Agree........................

CPL: CFI, CFII, MEI, Aerial Photography, Sight Seeing, Traffic Watch, Agriculture (crop duster), Pipeline, etc.......

ATP: Airline Transport Pilot

This should be the minimum requirement...................period.
JetJock16 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
Freightpuppy
Major
32
01-28-2009 09:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices