Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today >

Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Hudson Crash FO's Letter to USA Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2009, 10:52 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
I mean if he's been there for 20+ years and is still a A320 FO then why hasn't he upgraded to captain? This assuming he wasn't at one point and is a downgrade there.
Skiles is a former 737 CA for US Airways. His position in the right seat has everything to do with his seniority within his company.

Next point, isn't about 99.5% of all major airline pilots ATP's?
Yes.

Last edited by Sniper; 05-20-2009 at 10:54 AM. Reason: removed part of post that might have been misinterpreted as 'anti-regional pilot'.
Sniper is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:07 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

He is putting the carriage before the horse. It doesn't work that way. You can't raise requirements and expect people to show up for a 16000 dollar job. The reason why they had higher requirements back in the day was because the airlines were worth sacrificing for.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:09 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,610
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
I've never understood how an 'airline pilot' as recognized by industry never had to be an 'Airline Transport Pilot' as recognized by the FAA.

The FAR's are written in blood. The only question is, has enough blood be spilled yet to compel the FAA to act?

Well said, CA Skiles!

I agree with this in theory, but I think the cost of getting an ATP might be cost prohibitive to alot of people. The biggest wallet doesn't equal the best pilot. Perhaps the initial PC should be a PIC type ride for all newhires.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:10 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

It sounds like Sully pretty much threw CRM out the window, was flying AND talking on the radios and whatever else. Skiles basically rode down with the rest of them.

As a side note, I think that military attitude of "sit over there and don't touch anything", is likely a double edged sword. It worked out in the end though, can't argue with that.

We can all dream all day long about what minimums should be. Minimums will be dictated on supply and demand. Right now, Colgan can adjust their minimums up just by using some whiteout, because they ain't hiring. Once pilots become a commodity again, that'll be thrown out of the window.
bryris is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:16 AM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,273
Default

I agree, ATP for both pilots.

How to make it happen? Regionals either raise FO pay, or subsidize training. The puppy-mills could start offering 180-day ATP courses for $140K...

90 days for all your basic ratings ($50k/250 hours).

Another 90 days for time building ($90K/1250 hours)...14 flight hours/day for 90 days
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:21 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
utedrummer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Furloughed Righ Seater
Posts: 251
Default

I agree with him.

I find him arrogant that just because all the ducks lined up nicely for him and his pax he thinks gods gift to the flying public. (They still dented the plane)

But I agree with him about ATPs for all.
utedrummer is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:21 AM
  #27  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,273
Default

Originally Posted by bryris View Post

As a side note, I think that military attitude of "sit over there and don't touch anything", is likely a double edged sword. It worked out in the end though, can't argue with that.
That is the is the old-school civilian attitude too...the copilot did gear, flaps, and the odd landing (if he was lucky). Some fighter pilots naturally tend to do the same thing...that's why we have all the CRM emphasis these days.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:22 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
The reason why they had higher requirements back in the day was because the airlines were worth sacrificing for.


People are still sacrificing for aviation. To get into the industry, one must either incur large training costs ($30K or more, at least) or go the military route, incurring the cost of being away from home, giving up years of your life, and even lower pay in order to get the training needed to gain entry into an airline.

There are many who are on the outside of this profession looking in who would pay for the opportunity to fly for an airline. That's certainly a monetary sacrifice, no?

FO Shaw sacrificed her income, her QOL, her sleep, and, ultimately, her life, for 'the airlines'.

You want to be an airline transport pilot? Get the license.
Sniper is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:24 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
robthree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777, sofa
Posts: 1,183
Default

23 years ago the regional level was... US Air (ok Piedmont) and Eastern Air Lines. (At least in Florida where I grew up... In Texas it was WN and Texas Int'l.) Sixty seat jets were Fokker F28s and DC-9s. The routes were intra-state. In other words, regional flying.

One problem with experience in the cockpit is scope. No one wants to stay at Colgan, and few at a top shelf regional, simply because the brighter future is elsewhere. So the most experienced pilots there still ougt to be sitting in the right seat. The right seat of bigger equipment certainly. If all flights sold by CAL were operated by its own pilots, chances are better that a more experienced pilot would have been PIC that night. And the Colgan Captain would have been happy to be a 737 FO.

I tend to agree that an ATP ought to be the minimum requirement for passenger carrying under 121. But far more important is a stable environment where those with the most experience can pass it on to those who need it.

"You need someone older an wiser
Telling you what to do
I am seventeen going on eighteen
I'll take care of you"
robthree is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:33 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post


People are still sacrificing for aviation. To get into the industry, one must either incur large training costs ($30K or more, at least) or go the military route, incurring the cost of being away from home, giving up years of your life, and even lower pay in order to get the training needed to gain entry into an airline.

There are many who are on the outside of this profession looking in who would pay for the opportunity to fly for an airline. That's certainly a monetary sacrifice, no?

FO Shaw sacrificed her income, her QOL, her sleep, and, ultimately, her life, for 'the airlines'.

You want to be an airline transport pilot? Get the license.
Well.. exactly. What is the incentive for future pilots to show up for class under the current airline conditions? Not much. The crew of this flight both had well over 1500 hundred hours so if there's any case that proves that ATP requirements are needed it's not from this crash.
Purpleanga is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
Freightpuppy
Major
32
01-28-2009 09:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices