Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan Sunshine Hearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2010, 10:07 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Wow, that's amazing. Good catch Rickair7777.

How could it have not been a casual factor?
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 10:13 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dh05z28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I noted that the NTSB elected not to include fatigue as a casual factor, by a 2-1 vote.
Just heard that the rest requirements are about to change...Don't know to what or exactly when. I heard March 1. Any truth to this?
dh05z28 is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 10:32 PM
  #43  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by dh05z28 View Post
Just heard that the rest requirements are about to change...Don't know to what or exactly when. I heard March 1. Any truth to this?
Yes, congress pretty much ordered the FAA to do it following this accident. Babbitt & Co. have been doing their best to stall and delay, but they should have the new rules released this spring. Not sure when they will go into effect though...they will want to give the airlines plenty of time (maybe years) to adapt.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:07 AM
  #44  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
I hate in this instance when people keep using the phrase "Monday morning quarterbacking". What do you think is going to happen when you goof up and kill a bunch of people? Your actions are going to be scrutinized to the Nth degree.

Yes, we weren't there. It could happen to anyone of us (loss of airspeed). But all of us are trained to how to react to a stall. They got the stall warning a couple of seconds (I forget how many) before the pusher. Yes, it is going to get your attention, but the damn stall warning going off should have before that!

The ironic part is, the stick pusher was trying to do exactly what needed to be down ... lowering the nose.

The situation you described (high speed buffet in turbulent cruise) is very much different than theres.

Its a hard thing to admit; our fellow aviators and friends goofed up in the most basic way. For the sake of our family, friends, and passengers, that nobody else does this. We're better than that.
Two comments:

The crew should have been able to recover from a stall. Many have commented on the FO retracting flaps, unfortunately, that WAS what Colgan's FAA APPROVED training commanded. (stall recover training has since been changed)

The real root of the crash is that the plane should never have gotten slow. We as "professionals" should never allow that to happen. So, why did this crew let it happen? Was it fatigue or illness or maybe both had their plates at their sides rather than on the yolk and were taking one last look ? Had one of them been more alert, he/she could have identified the degrading speed and this would have been a non event.

I don't know, and I don't care to guess.

All we as "professionals" can do is identify hazardous situations, and bad habits EACH of us has, and work to eliminate them. Equally important, we need to put pressure on the FAA and our companies to increase minimum standards and improve training.

On a personal level, we should also realize the mistakes we have made, admit we made them, and thank Dog that they didn't end with a crash.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 05:22 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 41
Default

I'm not familiar with the Q-400, but isn't the recovery from a tailplane icing stall, Pitch-up, Flaps-up? Pitch down in that situation and you've screwed the pootch.
gtech88 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 05:35 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by gtech88 View Post
I'm not familiar with the Q-400, but isn't the recovery from a tailplane icing stall, Pitch-up, Flaps-up? Pitch down in that situation and you've screwed the pootch.
they weren't capable of keep the plaen at a flying airpseed, you think they were quick enough to think they had Tail ice?

C'mon now........
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 05:41 AM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 41
Default

Granted, the airspeed was allowed to slow, but with the all the talk of icing prior to the FAF, and with that seed in the back of the head.......
gtech88 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 05:50 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Furlough/Gun Driver
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Great Cornholio View Post
The main thing that sucks about this accident is the fact that it was a classic stall/spin accident which should never ever happen in the 121 world.
Best statement I've seen in a while. As professional pilots we are supposed to be flying, or monitoring the aircraft while on autopilot. The situation should never be allowed to degrade this far without intervention by one of the pilots.
dosbo is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 06:09 AM
  #49  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
they weren't capable of keep the plaen at a flying airpseed, you think they were quick enough to think they had Tail ice?

C'mon now........
Good God, why do people keep bringing that up!

They were probably fatigued, demonstrated a lack of very basic airmanship, and there is no evidence that either one one of them had ever even of HEARD of a tailplane stall, much less knew what to do about one.

But some folks think they BOTH reached a tailplane stall conclusion instantly and simultaneously, communicated via mental telepathy, and independently took the appropriate actions???

Why is there a need to keep hanging onto that straw? It is not helping anything at all. We need the process to focus on the real problems...

1) Training
2) Experience
3) Professionalism

We have to rely on the FAA and the airlines to fix 1 & 2, but we can all take a turn on #3. I personally have adopted a more sterile attitude after this accident. Same with CVG, ever since that one I verify RWY HDG as the levers come up.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 06:10 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Goodyear Blimp-roap jockey, CSIP, CFII, MEI
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
Oh really? You can't be serious?

I've flown two airliners (a heavy with sweptback wings and a medium sized airliner with tiny little wings). I've also flown a business jet, the beechliner, and a trainer. Conventional wings and sweptback wings. All of them had the same recovery as my little Cessna 152.

I don't know what is so advanced with Add Power, Relax Pitch, Gain Airspeed??? Perhaps there are some aircraft out there that throw in a few tricks up their sleeves, but I don't know them.

Their airmanship and situational awareness were extremely poor that night.
No SA Period Dot. Fatboy couldn't have put it better. That is the take home msg for this sad event. They had thousands of hours between the two of them, but they let their guard down and it bit them. Max Relax Roll...it's taught to us from day one. No excuses. Yes, fatigue, long commutes, economics (brutally poor pay and brutal hiring practices) all played a roll, but at the end of the day we can't be so negligent and kill ourselves by losing SA.
CFItillIdie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
mjarosz
Regional
128
08-26-2010 04:42 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
nwa757
Regional
23
06-11-2009 05:50 AM
aFflIgHt
Regional
1
01-16-2009 03:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices