Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Non-Movement Areas (taxiing through, holding on, etc.) >

Non-Movement Areas (taxiing through, holding on, etc.)

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Non-Movement Areas (taxiing through, holding on, etc.)

Old 08-01-2006, 07:08 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Austin Tower
Posts: 175
Question Non-Movement Areas (taxiing through, holding on, etc.)

This post is primarily for the NWA, FLG and MES pilots that fly through MEM, but comments from others would also be appreciated.

We have a daily nightmare of running out of space close to the terminal when your arrival gates are occupied, and few parking places near the runway when you don't have your numbers.

There is no formal procedure at MEM for dealing with this, and Controllers are allowed to use their own creative juices for locating a parking spot that is convenient for the operation. Common parking areas for these situations include: the "Juliet Runup Pad", "November Runup Pad", Taxiway November between M7 and M9 and Taxiway Sierra between Bravo and Kilo.

Several Controllers recently started using the non-movement area that is located on the north end Taxiway Juliet next to the DHL parking area. The subject is filled with diverse opinions at work regarding the legality of this from an ATC perspective.

Can you shed any insight on this matter from a pilot's perspective? What do the FAR's say? What is your company policy on utilizing non-movement areas? Pilot concerns?

Thanks,

MEM_ATC

(cross-posted to Hangar Talk)
AUS_ATC is offline  
Old 08-01-2006, 08:32 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Never flown through MEM. HOWEVER, in DTW they use the de-ice pad ALOT for traffic (ground stops, number waiting, MX/PAX "problems","cutting through").
As far as I know (which isn't much), it is "uncontrolled", so doing so is at the PIC's discretion.
We use to "cut through" the de-ice pad, then the Compnay put out a memo, NOT to do so. Then after further thought, put out a memo that it is up to the PIC. No liability to Company or ATC.
I personally don't see a problem, some do.
But as an FAA inspector told me once:
"There's never a problem, until there's a problem"
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 08-01-2006, 08:46 AM
  #3  
New boss = Old boss
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

As long as there is nothing to hit, I couldn't care less where you park me. Non-movement areas are just painted on the ground. You guys use the space available as you see fit.
mike734 is offline  
Old 08-01-2006, 06:30 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Cardinal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 93
Default

I see/use a non-movement area about the same way I see my driveway - for whatever the heck I please. If a ground/ramp controllers wants me there, so be it.
Cardinal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
1
08-01-2006 10:42 AM
Sasquatch
Cargo
0
09-04-2005 02:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices