Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

New Rest Rules?

Old 05-14-2010, 01:21 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 281
Default New Rest Rules?

Its never really going to happen is it?

People stopped paying attention and everyone went back to business as usual. Has any progress actually happened? Or should we just forget the whole thing?
yamahas3 is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 01:23 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

No it's probably coming soon.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 01:28 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TBucket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Default

It's not gonna happen. It would cost the airlines money.
TBucket is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 01:40 PM
  #4  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket View Post
It's not gonna happen. It would cost the airlines money.
Never compromise savings.
higney85 is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 03:14 PM
  #5  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Aviation safety is no longer sexy for Washington to discuss and fix
The Juice is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 03:36 PM
  #6  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

HR 915 FAA Reautherization Act has passed the House and contains the following language:


SEC. 306. FLIGHT CREW FATIGUE.

(a) In General- Not later than 3 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conclude arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences for a study of pilot fatigue.

(b) Study- The study shall include consideration of--

(1) research on pilot fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms;

(2) sleep and rest requirements of pilots recommended by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board; and

(3) Federal Aviation Administration and international standards regarding flight limitations and rest for pilots.

(c) Report- Not later than 18 months after initiating the study, the National Academy of Sciences shall submit to the Administrator a report containing its findings and recommendations regarding the study under subsections (a) and (b), including recommendations with respect to Federal Aviation Administration regulations governing flight time limitations and rest requirements for pilots.

(d) Rulemaking- After the Administrator receives the report of the National Academy of Sciences, the Administrator shall consider the findings in the report and update as appropriate based on scientific data Federal Aviation Administration regulations governing flight time limitations and rest requirements for pilots.

(e) Flight Attendant Fatigue-

(1) STUDY- The Administrator, acting through the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, shall conduct a study on the issue of flight attendant fatigue.

(2) CONTENTS- The study shall include the following:

(A) A survey of field operations of flight attendants.

(B) A study of incident reports regarding flight attendant fatigue.

(C) Field research on the effects of such fatigue.

(D) A validation of models for assessing flight attendant fatigue.

(E) A review of international policies and practices regarding flight limitations and rest of flight attendants.

(F) An analysis of potential benefits of training flight attendants regarding fatigue.

(3) REPORT- Not later than June 30, 2010, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.

(f) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 03:50 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
TedStryker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Aluminum tubing operator
Posts: 57
Default

The latest information (about a week old) that has come out is that proposed regulations are being held up at the Office of Management and Budget over concerns that the proposed regulations would prove too costly when compared to the potential benefits. Upon hearing this the Colgan 3407 families (among others) got very riled up about not compromising safety for costs. Who knows if it did any good.
TedStryker is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 04:14 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 281
Default

Wow, so according to that, its going to be up to 21 months after the passage of this bill before they even start creating new FARs.

This is completely pathetic.
yamahas3 is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 04:31 PM
  #9  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by yamahas3 View Post
Wow, so according to that, its going to be up to 21 months after the passage of this bill before they even start creating new FARs.

This is completely pathetic.
It's worse than 21 months. After that airlines will be allowed a set period to adapt to these new rules (hiring, scheduling software, etc..) I have heard that they may allow the airlines 24 months to make these changes...so how does 2014 sound for reform?
The Juice is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 06:39 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

I know this might come as a shock to some, but the FAA is worthless.
Wheels up is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
n287hg
Regional
35
10-12-2009 06:40 AM
mjarosz
Regional
6
05-20-2009 05:05 AM
Rascal
Major
20
01-10-2009 11:50 AM
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM
MD11HOG
Cargo
0
01-05-2009 10:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices