![]() |
Effect of lifting DCA Perimeter Rule
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews
If this goes through, how will it effect regional operations at DCA? Mainly US Airways (PSA, AWAC, CHQ) My thought is many of the regional flights will be replaced by new west coast destinations and maybe one more PHX. |
When I click that link it goes to Mesa's APC profile.. what am I supposed to be seeing there?:confused:
|
I would also like to see what would happen with LGA if they lifted that perimeter rule.
Both of them should be eliminated in my opinion. |
If DCA did drop that you'd probably see more of a "hub" in DCA. Regional feed per psa, pdt, rah, awac would still be needed. But you'd see flights like DCA-LAX, DCA-SFO, DCA-CUN etc etc... Also DAL would benefit with it in DCA as Airways, AA, DAL all would in LGA. But in LGA you have the port authority and they are just control freaks... But it would be great to go LGA-CUN, LGA-SEA etc... And yes regional feed would be cut some for "slot" reasons... Also I doubt you'd see the DAL/Airways court case due to them dropping it if either lost the perimeter rule.. Imho
|
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 838982)
When I click that link it goes to Mesa's APC profile.. what am I supposed to be seeing there?:confused:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_...r_restrictions |
sorry bout the wrong link... fixed it up there and here it is again.
washingtonpost.com my concern is DCA is slot controlled so unless US Airways starts flying redeyes to the west coast, I think some of the regional feed would have to be reduced. |
Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
(Post 839119)
my concern is DCA is slot controlled so unless US Airways starts flying redeyes to the west coast, I think some of the regional feed would have to be reduced.
Lifting the perimeter rules at LGA and DCA (with no increase in the total movements) would almost certainly reduce RJ operations at these airports, but would also create some growth opportunities and the mother ships and that is good for everyone. I think. |
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 839163)
Lifting the perimeter rules at LGA and DCA (with no increase in the total movements) would almost certainly reduce RJ operations at these airports, but would also create some growth opportunities and the mother ships and that is good for everyone. I think.
|
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 839012)
I would also like to see what would happen with LGA if they lifted that perimeter rule.
It's only 3,677 NM's away, after all. 'Vision Airlines' plays by their own rules.:D |
It would be nice to see this lifted. To bad this isn't the "land of the free".
|
In general, I would support the law, however this would grant it my automatic veto!
Of the flights reserved for small carriers, four would have to offer service to two airports in West Texas, a provision introduced by Hutchison, the ranking minority member of the Commerce Committee. |
I didn't think DCA could really handle cross country flights just due to runway size. Longest runway is under 7000 ft, might be weight restricted on those summer days. Think it got up to 102 the other day there.
But that is just IMO. I am a big dulles fan since I grew up by it. |
Originally Posted by Cloudchaser
(Post 839440)
I didn't think DCA could really handle cross country flights just due to runway size. Longest runway is under 7000 ft, might be weight restricted on those summer days. Think it got up to 102 the other day there.
But that is just IMO. I am a big dulles fan since I grew up by it. |
There are a few exceptions to the perimeter rule and I believe Alaska Airlines flies some flights to SEA on the 737-800 or -900. It can be done.
|
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 839696)
There are a few exceptions to the perimeter rule and I believe Alaska Airlines flies some flights to SEA on the 737-800 or -900. It can be done.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands