Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
XJT Pilot Stands Up to TSA >

XJT Pilot Stands Up to TSA

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XJT Pilot Stands Up to TSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2010, 09:11 PM
  #41  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: CRJ 200/700 FO
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony View Post
The quote is: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin

If you don't know it, don't make stuff up just to sound cool.
Anybody can quote anything on the internets and it is true- George Washington.
granlistillo is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 09:45 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 30
Default

Slightly different note of the ignorance of TSA, I was commuting out of MSP terminal one, the TSA asked me why I was there and I hold her I was going home. She then asked if i could still fly for free and I said yes and that it one of the last professional courties we still have, but give it time and they will take it away from us. She then proceeded to tell me she hope they do take it away and its not fair that we can but the TSA cannot. She was very addimit about it. the day TSA can bump me out of the jump or seat in the back for their own FREE travel, i just may go postal!
1900 Hundo is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:00 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pause's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Frenchy plane/ Left
Posts: 338
Default

Originally Posted by 1900 Hundo View Post
Slightly different note of the ignorance of TSA, I was commuting out of MSP terminal one, the TSA asked me why I was there and I hold her I was going home. She then asked if i could still fly for free and I said yes and that it one of the last professional courties we still have, but give it time and they will take it away from us. She then proceeded to tell me she hope they do take it away and its not fair that we can but the TSA cannot. She was very addimit about it. the day TSA can bump me out of the jump or seat in the back for their own FREE travel, i just may go postal!
Another example of "entitlement" mentality
pause is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:26 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
This person has some kind of complex. Caused all that drama just because they are too proud to do a pat down? REDICULOUS!

Refuse the body scanner, ok. But get off your high horse, get patted down, and go to work.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The U.S. Constitution/Amendment #4

Being a DC-9 pilot, I'm a pretty much crayon & napkin explanation kind of guy. Can anybody help me out with this? How is the treatment that even our passengers endure daily NOT CLEARLY a violation of our basic constitutional rights? I sure as heck don't see it. As someone who has on three (3) occasions sworn "...to defend our constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic..." I'm just not gettin' it. I, for one, am giving this guy a "Well done". Whatever his motives.
Regards,
Chuck
MEM DC-9/CA
chuck416 is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:35 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
tylervet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: E175 CA
Posts: 61
Default

Well he made my ATASmartBrief:
Pilot barred after refusing to submit to full body scan at Memphis International Airport The Commercial Appeal
tylervet is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:37 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 139
Default

I'm just not gettin' it.
That's because you're just a simpleton serf.

The US Surpreme Court justices are the only ones properly qualified to determine that being subjected to an unreasonable search when you aren't suspected of any criminal activity is perfectly constitutional.

Yes, that was sarcasm.

They deny you your constitutional rights on the grounds that by trying to enter the sterile area of the airport, you are giving your implied consent to the search, rendering it reasonable.

They've been pulling the same bull**** for years:
- DUI checkpoints
- Immigration checkpoints

They'll keep pressing until we show them we aren't going to take anymore...if that ever happens. We'll probably all be in prison by then.
johnpeace is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:42 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

chuck416 -

Well here is part of the problem (or solution depending on your particular point of view):
against unreasonable searches and seizures
Define "unreasonable" in this context.
The *people* also expect their gov't to protect them from harm.

There is a fine line, and it is constantly shifting both in reality, and in people's mind depending on how it presently affects them personally.
One minute - people are cursing the TSA (I know I do) because of long lines at security, crazy ineffective security procedures (like taking my nail clippers with a fingernail file on them - but letting me keep a pencil for example), etc....; yet some of those same would be the first to complain if something else happened and blame the gov't for not doing anything (or at least enough) to protect them.

TOTAL FREEDOM is in direct conflict with TOTAL SECURITY.
It seems to be more on a sliding scale - inverse that is.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 10:55 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 139
Default

Define "unreasonable" in this context.
'Unreasonable' is when you're randomly searching people who are under no suspicion of having done anything wrong, have no evidence suggesting they are involved in any kind of crime and for no cause except that they're traveling on an airplane.

It's no different than randomly searching people walking down a sidewalk or randomly searching cars at a checkpoint on the highway.
johnpeace is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:03 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

As said above it's implied consent, In other words, by entering an airport secure area you are voluntarily submitting to search (waiving your 4th ammendment rights). God Bless America.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:07 AM
  #50  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by johnpeace View Post
'Unreasonable' is when you're randomly searching people who are under no suspicion of having done anything wrong, have no evidence suggesting they are involved in any kind of crime and for no cause except that they're traveling on an airplane.

It's no different than randomly searching people walking down a sidewalk or randomly searching cars at a checkpoint on the highway.
Are you really equating clearing security to a DUI checkpoint?

Not even close. Both attempt to protect the general public from people with bad intentions and/or poor judgment.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maximilian2
Foreign
26
06-12-2015 04:31 AM
fastmulti
GoJet
129
07-08-2010 06:20 PM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices