Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
NTSB urges investigation into regional roles >

NTSB urges investigation into regional roles

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

NTSB urges investigation into regional roles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2010, 10:49 PM
  #21  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: DHC-8 FO
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by aewanabe View Post
Your view of the regionals is seriously outdated. There are still a few guys doing that for Lakes, Colgan, and Mesaba for a while longer. The majority of "regional" guys are flying jet equipment, some with autothrottles, from ILS to ILS. I never once did 8 landings as a "regional" guy (although I did as a check-hauler, which is another dying craft).
I have done 9 legs and a DH in one day, just to get 9hrs off and do 8 legs the next 4 days in a row. That was in a CRJ-200. Try working out in Hawaii for Mesa.
freakmonk is offline  
Old 10-28-2010, 03:31 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCLCREW's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Assistant Greens Keeper
Posts: 1,011
Angry

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey View Post
I will re-post. Shame on the regionals for hiring 250 hr wonders from ____ or ____. And shame on United for hiring them in the late 80's and early 90's.

I support the 1500 hr requirement plus an ATP without any exceptions.
Go ahead and add Eastern, Northwest, Northeastern, Flying Tigers... just to think of a few more. The late 70s through the early 90s had the same hiring practices as the regionals did 2006-2007. Oh and it wasnt just females...
Its called supply and demand... your example was BS. But I agreee with the 1500hr rule.
PCLCREW is offline  
Old 10-28-2010, 03:21 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
maddog81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 58
Default The good 'ol days

Originally Posted by PCLCREW View Post
Go ahead and add Eastern, Northwest, Northeastern, Flying Tigers... just to think of a few more. The late 70s through the early 90s had the same hiring practices as the regionals did 2006-2007. Oh and it wasnt just females...
Its called supply and demand... your example was BS. But I agreee with the 1500hr rule.
I few years ago the local magazine Minnesota Flyer publsihed an interview they did with a Northwest captain about his career. I don't have the issue anymore, but I remember the captain saying most people in that 1960s-70s timeframe came from a branch of the military. He, however, was a barber who went to an open house or career fair type of setup and ran into a rep from NWA and he talked about how much he enjoyed flying. Next thing he knew, he was F/E on a 707, and moved up from there. If I remember correctly he got conditionally hired at NWA without even having finished his commercial cert.

He also went on a tangent about American made, and how the "320" meant the 707-320...
maddog81 is offline  
Old 10-28-2010, 03:34 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye View Post
United hired a bunch of pilots at one time that didn't even have a commercial ticket. And ask some ladies what time they had when they first started. Some as low as 200hrs.
seafeye,

When you hear stories of low time pilots being hired back in the heyday you must realize they were being hired as flight engineers. They often ran the panel in DC-8's, 707's and 727's for years, gaining untold experience from the crusty fo's and captains long before they ever flew the aircraft themselves.

1500 hours and an ATP should be the minimum requirement. Either that or two years sitting sideways flying international in a DC-8 back in the 60's .

winglet
winglet is offline  
Old 10-28-2010, 07:11 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flapsfail's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 149
Default

Going to the panel as a FE is not a walk in the park. They may have had 300 hrs but at some point they moved up to the right seat and still had 300 hrs.

Remember boys and girls what got us here: this issue wasn't started by the low timers going to the regionals. Let's not forget who took the pay raise and qol improvements in exchange for relaxing the scope. My favorite are the dixie boys who can't say hi, or when I stop by the flight deck to say thanks for the ride can't even acknowledge me doing so. It's no wonder they came in 1st for worst airline...and yet they blame the regionals for these problems-they are a real class act.

I do agree with increasing to ATP mins, because at some point they will have to pay in order to retain and attract pilots-if they want to stay in business.
flapsfail is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 01:46 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by winglet View Post
seafeye,

When you hear stories of low time pilots being hired back in the heyday you must realize they were being hired as flight engineers. They often ran the panel in DC-8's, 707's and 727's for years, gaining untold experience from the crusty fo's and captains long before they ever flew the aircraft themselves.

1500 hours and an ATP should be the minimum requirement. Either that or two years sitting sideways flying international in a DC-8 back in the 60's .

winglet
Not all of them.

I jumpseated on a United flight in '91 or '92, I think a 767 or maybe a 757 cannot remember which for sure. There were two of us jumpseating, but I remember the FO (young female) left the flight deck for some reason and the crusty old Captain said to my fellow jumpseater, another crusty old Captain, "guess how much time she has?" We shrugged, and he said "300 hours". The other jumpseater said "and she flies this airplane?" and the Captain responded, emphatically, "H*** no. I fly and she talks on the radio".
skywatch is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 03:01 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Cautious's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Best seat in the house
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by aewanabe View Post
Your view of the regionals is seriously outdated. There are still a few guys doing that for Lakes, Colgan, and Mesaba for a while longer. The majority of "regional" guys are flying jet equipment, some with autothrottles, from ILS to ILS. I never once did 8 landings as a "regional" guy (although I did as a check-hauler, which is another dying craft).
I don't think 1500hrs or a license has anything to do with it. If you are unable to recover from a stall, or know what to do when the stick shaker activates, tired or not, in the goo or CAVU, the company you are flying for is going to have several lawsuits on their hands.
Cautious is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 03:46 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 410
Default

Originally Posted by Cautious View Post
I don't think 1500hrs or a license has anything to do with it. If you are unable to recover from a stall, or know what to do when the stick shaker activates, tired or not, in the goo or CAVU, the company you are flying for is going to have several lawsuits on their hands.
If 1500 hours were the requirement, the above referenced individual will have several hundred hours to kill himself and some boxes before he has a chance to do it to a plane load of paying passengers.

I support 1500 hours with an ATP (no exceptions).
ColdWhiskey is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 03:51 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinsilvia666's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 663
Default

dont forget turboprop means instant death ! muhaha stay away ! ...haha.
sinsilvia666 is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 04:02 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DashDriverYV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by Cautious View Post
I don't think 1500hrs or a license has anything to do with it. If you are unable to recover from a stall, or know what to do when the stick shaker activates, tired or not, in the goo or CAVU, the company you are flying for is going to have several lawsuits on their hands.
There is also a problem with the whole training and checking for stalls on PC's. You are graded to keep altitude within 100 feet. Tey are trying to change that but the whole stall series in sim training must be changed. I also think that a stall should be demonstrated in the actual aircraft. Simulator training is good, but should it ever happen, a pilots first recovery from an actual stall in the real plane shouldn't be with pax onboard.
The problem with regional airline safety is a multi layered one. Pilot experience is part of the problem, but not all.
DashDriverYV is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM
ERJ135
Regional
15
06-30-2007 01:39 PM
Ellen
Regional
42
11-01-2006 03:53 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices