![]() |
You should just ask what the outlook is for tomorrow, I can't answer that one either.
|
Originally Posted by WIPilot
(Post 984851)
what are you talking about? they are dropping already.
Now after the 1500 hour rule comes into play that may be a different story. |
Originally Posted by SkyHigh
(Post 984827)
Most likely the regionals will continue to grow and to pay poor wages.
Skyhigh |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 984830)
Retirements dictate that there will be upward movement, but that all depends on oil. If it keeps going up, airlines will park airplanes without replacing them. If it gets really bad, tanking the economy again the majors will re-enter bankruptcy and start terminating regional contracts, which will put regionals out of business since there doesn't appear to be much new flying to be had in that sector. Going forward you either keep what you have, or die.
If you can rationalize a way to ignore the whole oil issue, the hiring picture looks good. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/economy/images/figure_4.gif |
I honestly don't think any ATP/1500 rule is worth the paper it's written on.
I expect any number of the following to continue bid-nes as usual: 1. College training exemptions, lead by ERAU, UND, et al. 2. Military trained exemptions 3. Airline sponsored training exemptions 4. Ab initio program exemptions 5. Multi-Pilot License exemptions 6. "Emergency" exemptions when airlines scream they have to cancel flights since they can't find any more kids who are qualified and want to work for $20k. |
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 984888)
6. "Emergency" exemptions when airlines scream they have to cancel flights since they can't find any more kids who are qualified and want to work for $20k.
|
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 984888)
I honestly don't think any ATP/1500 rule is worth the paper it's written on.
I expect any number of the following to continue bid-nes as usual: 1. College training exemptions, lead by ERAU, UND, et al. 2. Military trained exemptions 3. Airline sponsored training exemptions 4. Ab initio program exemptions 5. Multi-Pilot License exemptions 6. "Emergency" exemptions when airlines scream they have to cancel flights since they can't find any more kids who are qualified and want to work for $20k. |
Originally Posted by DeadStick
(Post 984903)
When the nation's infrastructure is compromised, Congress can and will act with breathtaking speed. In my opinion, it's a near certainty that age 65 will be extended, which is probably still better than the alternative solution, the Multi-Crew Pilot License (MPL).
It seems that this would satisfy nearly everyone. Enhances the pilot supply pool, provides upward movement for those currently trapped at regionals, gives the seasoned citizen crowd a chance to work longer. |
Originally Posted by DeadStick
(Post 984903)
When the nation's infrastructure is compromised, Congress can and will act with breathtaking speed. In my opinion, it's a near certainty that age 65 will be extended, which is probably still better than the alternative solution, the Multi-Crew Pilot License (MPL).
I haven't heard even as much as a peep regarding this. Seems like 65 is about it. There comes a point at which skills diminish and reaction time slows. Sorry to say but until I see congress discussing this on the hill seriously, no truth to it. |
Originally Posted by slumav505
(Post 984951)
I haven't heard even as much as a peep regarding this. Seems like 65 is about it. There comes a point at which skills diminish and reaction time slows. Sorry to say but until I see congress discussing this on the hill seriously, no truth to it.
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/av...-age-70-a.html Age 70 for international pilots? - PPRuNe Forums |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands