![]() |
Originally Posted by Rnav
(Post 1067617)
So 400 pages of people talking about a company your about to go work for is "ridiculous"? Ever think that some of those post might be from current employees with good insight to inside info and experiences??? Sounds like your excuse for being lazy. With that type of demeanor I'd be more concerned about just making it through training...
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1067566)
I love when people make posts that are repetitive.
Pilots HAVE been forced into the CRJ for more then one reason. It's not unheard of. The above is exactly what I suggested. Something new would've been more helpful, rather then sneering at others pointlessly. Too much brew this evening ? Telling people they shouldn't start a new thread is rediculous. To get worked up over something so stupid and meaningless is sad. If it bugs you so badly, get off the forum or don't click. Does it really ruin your day because somebody made a new thread? |
Don't take the ATR unless you have to. There's hardly any movement on this side ad the planes are falling apart. If you want MIA bid the EMJ anywhere then put in the request. You'll get it within a few months.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1067958)
Don't take the ATR unless you have to. There's hardly any movement on this side ad the planes are falling apart. If you want MIA bid the EMJ anywhere then put in the request. You'll get it within a few months.
Because everyone who's forced onto the ATR as a newhire will most likely jump to the Jet after the 12 month seat lock expires, so that should create more movement above you, even in your 1st year. I have also read here that flying the Turbo-prop makes one a better pilot overall, however, the flip side is, that the ATR training is much more difficult than the Jets... Can you please explain more.... |
Originally Posted by bcpilot
(Post 1068009)
I always thought that the ATR's should have more movement......
Because everyone who's forced onto the ATR as a newhire will most likely jump to the Jet after the 12 month seat lock expires, so that should create more movement above you, even in your 1st year. I have also read here that flying the Turbo-prop makes one a better pilot overall, however, the flip side is, that the ATR training is much more difficult than the Jets... Can you please explain more.... As far as a better pilot..it comes down to two items IMO. 1) the automation on the ATR is basic. The plane can't do a hold on it's own. So you will have to figure out the entry and fly said entry. It also has a couple of extra levers but don't worry about those. Unless you're high and fast.:eek: The 2nd item is that it can be a bear to land especially in a x-wind. I've seen 15 year captains give those birds a good prang under the right conditions. But the jet has it's own issues to be aware of and both offer good experience. Good luck. TC |
In the past ATR guys held lines before anyone else, but with the massive amounts of new hires, of which 95% go to the jet. I am a march new hire on the ATR and I am nowhere close to holding a line while I could hold a line on the majority of the jet bases.
|
Originally Posted by BrewMaster
(Post 1067904)
Relax, Francis....
Telling people they shouldn't start a new thread is rediculous. To get worked up over something so stupid and meaningless is sad. If it bugs you so badly, get off the forum or don't click. Does it really ruin your day because somebody made a new thread? |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1068027)
In the past ATR guys held lines before anyone else, but with the massive amounts of new hires, of which 95% go to the jet. I am a march new hire on the ATR and I am nowhere close to holding a line while I could hold a line on the majority of the jet bases.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands