Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regionals need a new business model >

Regionals need a new business model

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regionals need a new business model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2012, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
guido15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 55
Default Regionals need a new business model

Commentary

Paradise Lost

U.S. regional carriers must find a new business model to survive

Aviation Week and Space Technology
February 13, 2012

There are worrying signals that a significant part of the airline industry could implode in the coming months, and despite the doom and gloom predictions from Europe this horror is occurring on the other side of the Atlantic.

U.S. regional airlines have always been perceived as tertiary to the majors and low-cost carriers that are household names across large swathes of the country. But despite the low-key brand awareness, most U.S. passengers have a first-hand experience of regionals as legacy carriers are becoming increasingly reliant on these smaller operators for feed.

Those feeder contracts used to be lucrative, with the majors assuming most of the risk while providing near-double-digit margins for a slew of companies. Indeed, these contracts were so healthy that regional airlines at times came to the financial aid of those same majors.

But those days are long gone, as mainline operators rein in costs, restructure the loosely written capacity purchase agreements and stringently enforce every condition of the new contracts.

The effect of these changes has been devastating. Mesa Air Group (above), a leading force in the growth of 50-seat jet feed in the early part of this century, is a shadow of its former self, having shed most of its fleet during a Chapter 11 protection proceeding that saw it emerge last year as a privately owned company with just a handful of contracts.

ExpressJet has disappeared completely after rewritten contracts by then-owner Continental Airlines eventually forced a sale to SkyWest, itself a stalwart of fiscal sobriety that is now posting consecutive quarterly losses because of that very acquisition. Elsewhere, Pinnacle Airlines' future is bleak after recently noting that just two of its contracts—both with Delta Air Lines—are viable, and Republic Airways' journey into mainline branded operations has traveled almost full circle as it attempts to offload Frontier Airlines. Worryingly, Republic last week also promoted its relationship with AMR Corp., which only entered Chapter 11 on Nov. 29, 2011, as its saving grace.

The viability of privately owned Trans States Holdings and Air Wisconsin is less known, although chatter from within indicates all is not well at either carrier, and while US Airways' patronage of Air Wisconsin means the feeder will shift capacity from New York LaGuardia to Washington Reagan National Airport, it came at the expense of the Arizona-based major's own regional subsidiary, Piedmont Airlines.

Piedmont's distress is mirrored at other wholly owned feeders, with Delta's Comair perpetually for sale and AMR's American Eagle Airlines operation under review and likely dependent on a combination of new scope clauses and drastic cuts in fleet costs.

And that is the crux of this sector's problem—the regionals' only option is to ask suppliers to share their pain.

Now this is nothing new to the airline industry and the majors have asked the same from their suppliers, which included the regionals. But this bandage does little to stanch a systemic problem that plagues the regional airline industry. It simply cannot survive on the current business model.

And it will only get worse. While reduced aircraft payments will provide a timely reprieve for many operators, there are other issues that need to be resolved, many of which were summarized in an internal memorandum posted earlier this month by Mesa Chairman/CEO Jonathan Ornstein.

In that message Ornstein warned that while his Chapter 11 reorganization eliminated some aircraft costs, the downsizing of the U.S. airline industry has produced a crew roster heavy in seniority but with a smaller fleet to spread that higher cost. Compounding this is an unexpected maintenance requirement for the airline's fleet of Bombardier CRJ900s that the launch customer thought was coming several years from now, and, according to Ornstein, new regulations that will increase fixed costs.

But the most telling part of that memo was Ornstein's insistence that he, like his peers, is signing contracts that will never make a profit simply to “live to fight another day.” This can only ensure that the regional industry is destined for failure.

Consolidation has been a byword for the global airline business model for years, but that will do little to help U.S. regionals, in fact it has contributed to their dilemma. Something deeper is required, but for now that solution is as absent as their profits.
guido15 is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:26 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Good, now lets get rid of them altogether and get all that flying where it belongs in the first place: majors.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:41 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FSUpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Right Seat Gear Swinger
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Good, now lets get rid of them altogether and get all that flying where it belongs in the first place: majors.
now only if the majors would holdout for scope... they are the reason the regionals are here in the first place. cant have the cake and eat it too.
FSUpilot is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 04:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinsilvia666's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 664
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Good, now lets get rid of them altogether and get all that flying where it belongs in the first place: majors.


agreed. plain and simple.
sinsilvia666 is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 05:06 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Good, now lets get rid of them altogether and get all that flying where it belongs in the first place: majors.
Yep. Kpia to kord should be at least a 737-500. Maybe a 319 kpit to gso?
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 05:25 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Windsor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Zee Airboos
Posts: 404
Default

OMG the sun will not rise in the morning. We are all doomed to lose our jobs! Every regional will fail!

What a crock of crap. The truth is only 1 airline has ever made a profit over a long stretch of time and thats WN. Even their glory days of profit are over. In the end, planes will move and pilots will fly. Who we are flying them for will probably change, but the planes will move none the less.

We need more happy posts on here. There's a pilot shortage coming....LOLOLOLOL!

Last edited by Windsor; 02-13-2012 at 05:26 PM. Reason: i'm retarded
Windsor is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 06:05 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

Remember the days when Pan Am and TWA ruled the skies and there were a handfull of trunk carriers flying the rest.

It that circle of life thing. Just saying
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 06:29 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Here is the thing. There is something the majors don't want to do. Fly smaller aircraft to medium and small sized communities. So regionals in some form or another will be around in the future. How big they will be and what aircraft they will fly is the big unknown.
FR8DOG71 is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 07:23 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by FR8DOG71 View Post
Here is the thing. There is something the majors don't want to do. Fly smaller aircraft to medium and small sized communities. So regionals in some form or another will be around in the future. How big they will be and what aircraft they will fly is the big unknown.
If by "the majors" you mean mainline management, it seems to me that they have no desire to actually get their hands dirty operating an airline at all. Whether it be on a peer-to-peer level (oneworld, Star Alliance, etc.), or on a regional feed relationship, I think they'd just rather compete sub-contractors against each other on a rolling basis to keep contract costs down and reap bonuses every quarter.

If by "the majors" you mean mainline pilots and their union representation, I think, and HOPE, that they have learned from past mistakes made on scope. Hundreds of pilots are furloughed from mainline and flying at regionals making half the pay they were previously on the same routes. Futher, thousands of pilots have joined the airline ranks in the past 10 years with severely diminished career expectations because of the collapse of mainline scope restrictions.

I don't think it's a strertch of the imagination to see that all pilots would benefit if all of this flying was operated at the mainline level.
Golden Bear is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 07:26 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin View Post
Yep. Kpia to kord should be at least a 737-500. Maybe a 319 kpit to gso?
Is this sarcasm?
AxialFlow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20424
Today 11:44 AM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
6
08-15-2009 04:38 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
jared4271987
Flight Schools and Training
10
09-18-2008 07:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices