Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 192
Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans
Has there been anything set in stone yet for when regionals will start retiring the CRJ from their fleets? It seems like based upon fuel costs, etc., it doesn't make sense to continue to operate. Your opinions?
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 105
There hasn't been anything official about Pinnacle's 200's being retired. In fact, they are some of the youngest in the CRJ-200 fleet so I would be very surprised to see them retired. Now given or traded to another operator is a different story.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
This is the AIRLINES bud, regionals at that. Nothing is EVER "set in stone".
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
SkyWest has seem to have gotten their hands on just about every one of them they can. Even the really old ones that were parked in the desert were pulled out and are flying again.
10 years from now? They'll probably all be over in Asia.
10 years from now? They'll probably all be over in Asia.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Where did that rumor get started anyway? Embraer has never built a "throw away" plane. In the 1960's and '70s when Embraer was getting their start Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed were already entrenched with Airbus hot on their heels. ATR, Beech and De Havilland were already major players in the small turboprop market by the time Embraer was producing the 110 and the 120. You don't build a reputation and win market share in the aircraft business by building "throw away" airplanes. The 145 series is a decent ride when it's maintained well, especially the XRs. One thing I've noticed commuting is that the same things we whine about on the RJs are the same things the guys on the 737/320/757 whine about. What percentage of Brasilias and Banderantes are still flying around?
#10
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 562
Where did that rumor get started anyway? Embraer has never built a "throw away" plane. In the 1960's and '70s when Embraer was getting their start Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed were already entrenched with Airbus hot on their heels. ATR, Beech and De Havilland were already major players in the small turboprop market by the time Embraer was producing the 110 and the 120. You don't build a reputation and win market share in the aircraft business by building "throw away" airplanes. The 145 series is a decent ride when it's maintained well, especially the XRs. One thing I've noticed commuting is that the same things we whine about on the RJs are the same things the guys on the 737/320/757 whine about. What percentage of Brasilias and Banderantes are still flying around?
Like what, Tiny plane, that is loud as hell, have to duck to walk down the aisle, and sounds like it will fall apart on taxi when it starts making that loud creaking noise. I doubt the 737/320/757 have that problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post