Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans >

Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2012, 06:21 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 192
Question Long-term CRJ-200 retirement plans

Has there been anything set in stone yet for when regionals will start retiring the CRJ from their fleets? It seems like based upon fuel costs, etc., it doesn't make sense to continue to operate. Your opinions?
skylover is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 06:50 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 562
Default

Seems like DL is already doing it. First Comair, Now PNCL, Next I would assume they will start trading or retiring ASA 200's
samballs is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 07:00 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Where are all these jets ending up? Africa? Beer cans?
lolwut is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 07:02 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by samballs View Post
Seems like DL is already doing it. First Comair, Now PNCL, Next I would assume they will start trading or retiring ASA 200's
There hasn't been anything official about Pinnacle's 200's being retired. In fact, they are some of the youngest in the CRJ-200 fleet so I would be very surprised to see them retired. Now given or traded to another operator is a different story.
WorkingUp is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 08:23 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Default

Originally Posted by skylover View Post
Has there been anything set in stone yet for when regionals will start retiring the CRJ from their fleets? It seems like based upon fuel costs, etc., it doesn't make sense to continue to operate. Your opinions?
This is the AIRLINES bud, regionals at that. Nothing is EVER "set in stone".
freezingflyboy is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 08:25 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vertisch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Catching breathe
Posts: 240
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy View Post
This is the AIRLINES bud, regionals at that. Nothing is EVER "set in stone".
I wouldnt even say an eraseable pen is used...
Vertisch is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 09:02 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
Default

SkyWest has seem to have gotten their hands on just about every one of them they can. Even the really old ones that were parked in the desert were pulled out and are flying again.

10 years from now? They'll probably all be over in Asia.
Utah is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 06:23 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 168
Default

It's just not the 200s that are old. The embraer 145/140/135s are getting up there in age to for a plane that was suppose to be a throw away plane.
RomeoSierra is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 10:16 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Default

Originally Posted by RomeoSierra View Post
It's just not the 200s that are old. The embraer 145/140/135s are getting up there in age to for a plane that was suppose to be a throw away plane.
Where did that rumor get started anyway? Embraer has never built a "throw away" plane. In the 1960's and '70s when Embraer was getting their start Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed were already entrenched with Airbus hot on their heels. ATR, Beech and De Havilland were already major players in the small turboprop market by the time Embraer was producing the 110 and the 120. You don't build a reputation and win market share in the aircraft business by building "throw away" airplanes. The 145 series is a decent ride when it's maintained well, especially the XRs. One thing I've noticed commuting is that the same things we whine about on the RJs are the same things the guys on the 737/320/757 whine about. What percentage of Brasilias and Banderantes are still flying around?
freezingflyboy is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 05:09 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 562
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy View Post
Where did that rumor get started anyway? Embraer has never built a "throw away" plane. In the 1960's and '70s when Embraer was getting their start Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed were already entrenched with Airbus hot on their heels. ATR, Beech and De Havilland were already major players in the small turboprop market by the time Embraer was producing the 110 and the 120. You don't build a reputation and win market share in the aircraft business by building "throw away" airplanes. The 145 series is a decent ride when it's maintained well, especially the XRs. One thing I've noticed commuting is that the same things we whine about on the RJs are the same things the guys on the 737/320/757 whine about. What percentage of Brasilias and Banderantes are still flying around?


Like what, Tiny plane, that is loud as hell, have to duck to walk down the aisle, and sounds like it will fall apart on taxi when it starts making that loud creaking noise. I doubt the 737/320/757 have that problem.
samballs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DYNASTY HVY
Money Talk
23
04-02-2011 05:48 PM
Flaps50
Cargo
38
01-22-2008 04:37 PM
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 08:56 AM
Bengalsfan
Fractional
2
02-06-2006 02:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices