Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   What's Holding You Back? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/69530-whats-holding-you-back.html)

80ktsClamp 08-19-2012 07:44 AM


Originally Posted by ERJ135 (Post 1248278)
Actually it could be much more simple. At least at Eagle, we are all getting PIC types starting this month for prepartion for the new law. Each leg we fly, we log it as PIC time. It would require a change in the law but, make it much like 91.

Dont log that as PIC!!! You are not aircraft commander! That will bite you hard in the rear end when you go to interview for a major.

sandrich 08-19-2012 08:00 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1248282)

Dont log that as PIC!!! You are not aircraft commander! That will bite you hard in the rear end when you go to interview for a major.

That wasn't what he was saying (i think) he meant since they are getting PIC types, they COULD log pic time IF the law was changed to something like part 91...

80ktsClamp 08-19-2012 08:05 AM


Originally Posted by sandrich (Post 1248295)
That wasn't what he was saying (i think) he meant since they are getting PIC types, they COULD log pic time IF the law was changed to something like part 91...

You may be right. I keep going back and forth on my interpretation of his post. Weird wording...

sandrich 08-19-2012 08:12 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1248298)

You may be right. I keep going back and forth on my interpretation of his post. Weird wording...

Yeah I took a double take at first. Probably had the "not sure if serious or stupid" face on when reading it.

USMCFLYR 08-19-2012 08:18 AM


Originally Posted by sandrich (Post 1248295)
That wasn't what he was saying (i think) he meant since they are getting PIC types, they COULD log pic time IF the law was changed to something like part 91...

Exactly what LAW would need to be changed?

USMCFLYR

sandrich 08-19-2012 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by USMCFLYR (Post 1248305)
Exactly what LAW would need to be changed?

USMCFLYR

Reg* pardon my lack of intelligence. I was correcting someones interpretation of a post, thanks for missing the point though...

USMCFLYR 08-19-2012 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by sandrich (Post 1248307)
Reg* pardon my lack of intelligence....geez. thanks for missing the point.

Not missed at all.
Regulation / law no matter.
I still ask what needs to be changed to let the poster who asked the question to log those legs as PIC?

The law/regulation already exists - as was mentioned about part 91 flying.

The *danger* of logging that time is due to different airline's requirement for time that they wish to be logged in such a manner.

- - or did I still miss your point sandrich?

USMCFLYR

FlyPurdue 08-19-2012 08:45 AM

Log what ever you want as PIC, but FedEx, UPS, Southwest, and Expat Jobs, that require xxxx hours of turbine PIC, only accept one kind - real PIC/AC time. Not PIC by way of 'sole manipulator,' a 'reg change,' or 'seat switching.' The few 91 operators I am familiar with do switch seats leg-by-leg, or day-by-day, BUT most of the time both pilots are considered captains, do make the final decision when in the left, and have very similar salaries.

Until that happens in 121 (never) the pilot whom autographs the release is the only one whom should log PIC time.

Cheers!

sandrich 08-19-2012 08:54 AM


Originally Posted by USMCFLYR (Post 1248309)

I still ask what needs to be changed to let the poster who asked the question to log those legs as PIC?

USMCFLYR

No clue. I dont even know what the thread is about anymore. I just saw what may have been a misinterpretation and thought I'd clarify the if/could matter.I don't necessarily support this "right seat PIC" so perhaps I don't even know what the point is anymore haha.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands