Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Regionals receiving PIC Type Rating? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/71367-regionals-receiving-pic-type-rating.html)

satpak77 11-26-2012 09:49 PM

OK, so I wonder if the OP's question is answered. This appears to be no big deal. Back to regular programming.....

2bennySODC6 11-26-2012 09:54 PM

Republic started doing this in July or August. There are a number of FOs who think they will log PIC time on their leg. They are wrong, they are not the PIC...:eek::eek:

TeddyKGB 11-26-2012 10:05 PM


Originally Posted by Senior Skipper (Post 1299617)
What's the "PIC type" worth?

Nothing. Soon everyone will have ATP's and types. All that matters is how much PIC time you have in that type.

starship 11-26-2012 10:05 PM


Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 1299613)
Part of the ATP rule is that EVERYONE has to have a PIC type... We all know the SIC types are worthless anyways...

Actually when I got hired here at RAH I already had my ATP and the company later put out a memo that stated that those that already have the ATP won't be getting the PIC Type when you go back for the recurrent/proficiency check. I don't think the PIC type is required in the new law, just the ATP but could be wrong.

Senior Skipper 11-27-2012 12:12 AM


Originally Posted by 2bennySODC6 (Post 1299630)
Republic started doing this in July or August. There are a number of FOs who think they will log PIC time on their leg. They are wrong, they are not the PIC...:eek::eek:

They are not acting PIC, but they're able to log it. FDX, SWA etc. won't care about that PIC time anyway, so nothing will really change.

Senior Skipper 11-27-2012 12:16 AM


Originally Posted by Delta1067 (Post 1299631)
Nothing. Soon everyone will have ATP's and types. All that matters is how much PIC time you have in that type.

Exactly. I don't get why people are hung up over the "SIC only" limitation (or the lack thereof). I'm a First Officer. Whether or not I have the restriction, I'm still not in charge. Why do people think DAL is gonna start hiring a bunch of RJ FO's now that the SIC limitation is gone?

BoilerUP 11-27-2012 02:19 AM


Originally Posted by Senior Skipper (Post 1299641)
They are not acting PIC, but they're able to log it. FDX, SWA etc. won't care about that PIC time anyway, so nothing will really change.

I imagine a LOT of hiring types (well beyond those requiring Part 1 PIC) won't be too impressed with a candidate who has turbine PIC in their logbook under the sole manipulator clause...in a 121 operation.

AtlCSIP 11-27-2012 04:00 AM

Part 91 operators generally don't care where you get the PIC time from, or under which regulation you logged it, so long as you have it and can be insured. If someone was looking to leave the airlines and fly corporate, it could be a windfall for them. An far as the value of an SIC type is concerned, it makes you employable at your current place of employment. That is valuable.

Mason32 11-27-2012 04:09 AM


Republic started doing this in July or August. There are a number of FOs who think they will log PIC time on their leg. They are wrong, they are not the PIC...:eek::eek:
You obviously do not understand Title 14.

Mason32 11-27-2012 04:10 AM



Originally Posted by Delta1067 (Post 1299631)
Nothing. Soon everyone will have ATP's and types. All that matters is how much PIC time you have in that type.

Exactly. I don't get why people are hung up over the "SIC only" limitation (or the lack thereof). I'm a First Officer. Whether or not I have the restriction, I'm still not in charge. Why do people think DAL is gonna start hiring a bunch of RJ FO's now that the SIC limitation is gone?
Because a lot of part 91 operators would.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands