Hiring Mins
 

I'm sure this question is asked quite a bit but I don't visit here often so I thought I'd ask...
I'm interested in a career for several regionals including Eagle and XJT. I have the opportunity to get my type rating for the CRJ or ERJ and I know Eagle has lower minimums for those who have the type. My question is, will I have just as good of a chance of getting a job with 500-600tt and 150-200 multi as I would having my type and 100 multi?

Great, that's what we need to start doing here in the US....having pilots buy type ratings to go to regionals. That way the airline can save on training costs!

In Europe its become the norm. But in their case they fly 73 or 320 where first year FO pay is equivalent to captain pay at a US regional.

Obviously money isn't tight if youve got 20 grand to **** away at a type that you won't need for another 3-5 years.

Since you've got cash, build some multi, instruct a little and if you have to...go do ATPs Regional Jet Standards Certification. Only 6k.

Yah, with living costs 2-3 times L.A's

If you're talking about London/Paris/Milan/Rome, the cost is probably equivalent or slightly higher than LA. Other cities can be a lot more reasonable.
Still, their pay is much higher than regional airlines, even if you factor the cost of living, but you have to pay $40k in advance for a Type rating.:eek:

It's all your own perogative, but;

1) DON'T buy the type if you don't have to. What good does a CRJ type do you if you get hired by an ERJ operator? Yeah, you paid your money and passed the ride, big deal. Guess what? Alot low time pilots get hired at regionals and pass the training, WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT.

2) Set you career goals just a tad higher. I'm a regional pilot NOW, but that is not my CAREER GOAL. If the fit hits the shan and I'm stuck, so be it. But when I got into this business, RJ pilot was not the planned career destination. I'm not dissing the guys that are sticking it out for whatever reason, most of their reasons are very valid. I'm just still aiming for bigger/better things in this career.

There was a guy in my interview group who had a crj type rating that he bought. But in the interview he couldn't even fly a ils approach in the frasca. Needless to say he didn't make it past lunch time.

You type-getters are screwing us all.

So, FU** you!

Lighten up Francis

...You type-getters are screwing us all.

So, FU** you!...

Sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the rock... :)



Anyways, to help answer your question, I would not get the type rating. The ATP written will help (at least study for it) in aswering some tech questions in the interview. Also, from what I see and heard, 800/200 is fairly competitive (although some outfits have higher standards, and some lower). I'd get some very quality flight time, get good at instruments and approaches. And should the outfit you want to apply for require a sim check as a part of the interview, then perhaps paying for some sim time before the interview may be of help. Good Luck to you....

While I don't condone anyone paying for training/types, especially in the current environment, I'd be interested in hearing if you are interested in employment with SWA? It's the same thing...have/would you tell anyone at SWA your feelings?

Anyway, don't buy a type in an RJ, its a waste, any type is a waste if you don't have PIC time to back it up. But if you want to waste money and go buy a type, go buy a citation or 737 type and save yourself 15 grand over the RJ.

Personally, I would go take your ATP written, and spend some of that cash on multi time if needed. Worst case, go get a job at Mesa for as long as it takes for you to get to a better regional!

Southwest requires a B737 type rating for employment. Whereas no other regional does.

Southwest is also a major contributor to the declination of pilot salaries across the board.

Is that why their pilot are the highest paid passenger pilots in the industry, just flying 737's?

No, they pay their pilot's well.

The problem lies in the fact that they require a 737 type, therefore- when they train pilots, they don't spend all that much time in the sims or in groundschool. I've got a good friend that is a Senior SWA CA. According to Kelleher, the company has saved well over $200 million in initial training of pilots by requiring the 73 type.

What does this do you ask? Simple. They're cutting costs, which in return means lower fares, and forces the companies that don't require PFT to in return cut their costs, albeit pilot concessions.

Now true, SWA and their requirement isn't the sole factor salaries are at an all time low, but they aren't helping the situation.

SWA and Pinnacle are identical.

Go to JetUniversity, get your CRJ type and you're guaranteed a job. A+ Pinnacle.

I guess it's more over there since their airline industry didn't go down as it did in the u.s.....9/11 didn't take place over there, that's also a factor....

I have a friend, and he did his flight training at the klm flight academy. All they have over there are the actual simulators, their flight training is actually being done in arizona, I believe. Flight training in Amsterdam is not affordable really. Not to mention taxes and user fees.
But after he finished his flight training, got a type rating in one of the airplanes of klm's fleet, he got actually hired by KLM and is flying first right seat with them. Besides that, he had financed his study at klm academy and the airline klm PAID off his loan:confused: .

so, yah...I guess JAA is a bit better than FAA?

Here's some education:

We're gonna compare Delta's rates because they are the only numbers I have that are pre-concessionary for the legacies.

Pre-concessionary Contracts

DAL 737-300 (low end) and 737NG (high end)

Yr | -CA- | -FO-
12 | $257 | $175
01 | $212 | $56
Awesome pension and 401(k)


SWA 737 (all types) pay when DAL's above pay rates were effective

Yr | -CA- | -FO-
12 | $179 | $118
01 | $158 | $47
401(k)


Yep, you read that right - a topped out FO at DAL was making within 2% of what a topped out SWA CAPTAIN was making!

==============================================

After concessions (current rates):
DAL 737-300 (low end) and 737NG (high end)

Yr | -CA- | -FO-
12 | $157 | $103
01 | $139 | $49
401(k)


SWA 737 (all types) pay (current rates):

Yr | -CA- | -FO-
12 | $198 | $131
01 | $174 | $52
401(k)




So I ask you, is SWA the highest paid because they raised the bar, or because others fell considerably? SWA built their airline off of their employee's low paid butts. There is no high horse for them to be on.

Exactly!!!!

If we ever want to get back to the way it was before 9-11, (doubt it) you guys entering the industry have got to think long term instead of "how can I get my turbine time the quickest"!!!!

interesting, very intertesting, seems as though FOSTERS is right once agian, if the industry didnt tank SWA would be one of the least favorable places, hope the industry rebounds

Bring that up in an interesting discussion with a furloughed SWA pilot...oh yeah there arent any...free kool aid a couple houses down from a popular ATL hotel......

You guys forget: that when SWA started becoming a player (mid 1990's), most airlines either required a type rating and/or training bond (indentured servitude?) when you started so it was not unusual then. They are in the position now where they can ask for it.

Also, the reason Delta went under was, even with their higher wages, their Quality of Service / Travel Experience sucked compared to SWA. And evidently it's not all price, because SWA has been raising fares all year long, with no drop in business.....

From my memory, I can remember SWA not being the best paid pilots in the industry years ago, however, i can also remember tons of pilots wanting to go there, even when they weren't going to make the $$ they could have at the legacy carriers, they kept mentioning some QOL stuff, and how well the company was treating it's employees.