SAPA 'Negotiations' Update
#201
So if Skywest gets a higher rate, who is riding whose coat tails. Funny how some can pick and chose what cost tails we ride here at Skywest.
#202
You mean the expressjet 70 seat rate that they negotiated without the ASA MEC. Yea that sure helped everyone out by raising the bar.
So if Skywest gets a higher rate, who is riding whose coat tails. Funny how some can pick and chose what cost tails we ride here at Skywest.
So if Skywest gets a higher rate, who is riding whose coat tails. Funny how some can pick and chose what cost tails we ride here at Skywest.
What higher rates would SKW get? Are you referring rates for the Ejets? I am not sure why many people believe that the Ejet shall pay more than the CRJ.
#203
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Thanks for typing it for me, the pilots are simply flying what they negotiated with the company. The company bid a contract that they can't fly, they need to talk to mainline but instead they turn to pilots. This cycle has been going on for years and the SKW pilots want the EXJ pilots to take concessions, work for less so the company can make a profit and have more success in future bids... In other words s do they can underbid other airlines.
One airline takes cuts, then the other matches it and management underbids, just to repeat the cycle again.
But as long as I am flying and get to mainline right! The more we do this the more reason we give management to continue transferring mainline jobs to the regionals. We are flying F100, DC-9 and similar size equipment for what the FA used to get paid... We are our worse enemies.
One airline takes cuts, then the other matches it and management underbids, just to repeat the cycle again.
But as long as I am flying and get to mainline right! The more we do this the more reason we give management to continue transferring mainline jobs to the regionals. We are flying F100, DC-9 and similar size equipment for what the FA used to get paid... We are our worse enemies.
My beef with some of the vocal minority at express jet is simply their inability to grasp the facts. And to show a willingness to work with their management to make meaningful changes which will lead to a sustainable company for all of us.
So if Skywest gets a higher rate, who is riding whose coat tails. Funny how some can pick and chose what cost tails we ride here at Skywest.
Anyway, when you factor in our higher 401k matching and B fund, that measly $2 override is still more than your or ASA large RJ compensation despite our concessionary rate! In other word, when you look at the totality of our contract, the overall compensation is right up there.
Last edited by Nevets; 07-21-2013 at 02:08 PM.
#204
Nevets, what have you got against SKW "riding coat tails"? I don't think them getting decent compensation is doing as much harm as a union carrier like Pinnacle lowering the bar for compensation industry wide. Or is it acceptable for PCL to hamstring the industry because they pay dues?
#205
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Nevets, what have you got against SKW "riding coat tails"? I don't think them getting decent compensation is doing as much harm as a union carrier like Pinnacle lowering the bar for compensation industry wide. Or is it acceptable for PCL to hamstring the industry because they pay dues?
#206
Nevets is an ALPA cheerleader who prays at the Herndon alter. I've seen it many times...They are incapable of independent thought. It's really very sad.
Personally, I believe that SGU has done more good for the ASA pilots than Herndon has. That is coming from a former ALPA cheerleader and office holder.
Personally, I believe that SGU has done more good for the ASA pilots than Herndon has. That is coming from a former ALPA cheerleader and office holder.
#207
I don't think it's a question of right and wrong. Look at those carriers that are unionized; there's no solidarity. Mesa bids different rates on -200 flying than Air Whiskey. Even at the unionized carriers, you have 737 Captains at SWA making more than wide body Captains at UAL. Point being: there's no set standard. And without that, who's to say what is right and wrong? I know some people will say "But if Jerry could pay you $10 less an hour, he would!" But c'mon...what CEO wouldn't that apply to? Having not worked at Skywest, from the outside looking in, it looks like Jerry has 'cracked the code' on what we all knew before: compensate your employees as best you can and they'll take care of the company. But he's probably just taking a page out of Kelleher's book.
#208
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
I don't think it's a question of right and wrong. Look at those carriers that are unionized; there's no solidarity. Mesa bids different rates on -200 flying than Air Whiskey. Even at the unionized carriers, you have 737 Captains at SWA making more than wide body Captains at UAL. Point being: there's no set standard. And without that, who's to say what is right and wrong? I know some people will say "But if Jerry could pay you $10 less an hour, he would!" But c'mon...what CEO wouldn't that apply to? Having not worked at Skywest, from the outside looking in, it looks like Jerry has 'cracked the code' on what we all knew before: compensate your employees as best you can and they'll take care of the company. But he's probably just taking a page out of Kelleher's book.
So to my original point to you, even if we do agree that pinnacle is a drag for everyone, that doesn't make it ok for everyone or anyone else to also be a drag as well. That's what I meant that two wrongs don't make a right.
#209
But Skywest ISN’T a drag. That’s MY point. Where’s the outrage at the unionized carriers that are a drag on the industry? On the surface, it looks like someone saying “If I gotta give up 2% of my salary, everybody else should, too!” Where’s the maturity in that? How about we all just quit looking in our neighbor's yards, and go back to mowing our own lawns?
#210
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
But Skywest ISN’T a drag. That’s MY point. Where’s the outrage at the unionized carriers that are a drag on the industry? On the surface, it looks like someone saying “If I gotta give up 2% of my salary, everybody else should, too!” Where’s the maturity in that? How about we all just quit looking in our neighbor's yards, and go back to mowing our own lawns?
That clear things up a bit?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post