![]() |
Originally Posted by frankwasright
(Post 1445182)
Hang on a sec...Maybe that is what is needed.How about offering an "up and out" policy :You agree to upgrade at the first offer-no holding out for a better base,etc.Then,after two years-that's it,you're gone.You should have 1,000 pic or better and it would solve the "lifer problem".Pay about $50/hr.,no matching 401K,minimal insurance,but hey,the "I'm just here for the 1,000 PIC and I'm out" crowd would be happy,hmmm ? Plus,it would not affect anyone currently on the property.You're welcome.
|
I am waiting on my reps response but the word is that the proposal was voted down.
|
I hope so. For once, we should hold the line.
|
This will be the end for Eagle as we know it.
The right thing was done. |
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1445280)
This will be the end for Eagle as we know it.
The right thing was done. We have cost comparable to RAH, our biggest competitor today. We cost less than SKW inc, another competitor but we cost more than Pinnacle whom AMR can't contract with. In 2016 AMR will get an adjustment that will ensure they are getting feed at prices of the two lowest regionals with comparable size. A B scale for new hires is not going to decide whether they will re fleet eagle. Companies willing to assume all liability, acquire the airframes, allow for multiple exit and adjustment clauses and willingness to underbid everyone else is what will decide this factor. AMR is currently spending a significant amount of money on new hires. The B Scale was about driving the whole industry down and putting you under such scale between now and 2016. I don't think this will influence them one bit. |
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1445280)
This will be the end for Eagle as we know it.
The right thing was done.
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1445170)
You are right,I really don't care what happens here. If we get to vote, I will flip a coin and vote based on that.
The company already knows what the future is regardless of a yes or no vote. We Dont have any control over it. |
I hope so. For once, we should hold the line. Fellow American Eagle pilots: This morning the MEC convened via telephone and passed the following motion regarding US Airways’ proposal to the EGL MEC: The concept of a B scale is unacceptable and thus this document is unacceptable and shall NOT be sent for pilot ratification; further the MEC hereby declines any further negotiations with a reference to a B scale. As you may be aware, US Airways and Eagle management had provided the Eagle MEC with this most recent proposal and stated that it was unable to come off of the B-Scale concept. Although this most recent offer contained a fleet plan, guaranteed by the mainline, which included the delivery of “large RJ” aircraft, and a slightly increased flow to AA, the MEC overwhelmingly decided that the introduction of a B-Scale into the regional industry was not an acceptable means by which to accomplish these goals. Eagle pilots know far too well that a guaranteed job at the mainline carrier can quickly be delayed by a decade or more, and further degradation of our segment of the industry not only fails to address cyclical stagnation but also severely damages pattern bargaining for our sister carriers. US Airways has indicated that if the Eagle pilots do not enter into this agreement with management, then it will source these deliveries elsewhere. The burden now falls on our brothers and sisters at other carriers to take their own stand and stop further degradation of the industry by making concession after concession for the promise of new metal. We will continue to support them in this cause. Fraternally, TG |
Thank you Eagle pilots and your union leadership!
|
HA and all the 9E cheerleaders were adament that everyone would cave. Not quite ;)
|
Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30
(Post 1445297)
Thank you Eagle pilots and your union leadership!
|
Originally Posted by MrMustache
(Post 1445304)
HA and all the 9E cheerleaders were adament that everyone would cave. Not quite ;)
|
Gentleman, It's to early to celebrate.
The concept of a B scale is unacceptable and thus this document is unacceptable and shall NOT be sent for pilot ratification; further the MEC hereby declines any further negotiations with a reference to a B scale. The B scale idea was rejected but the concessions negotiations are a go as long as the company returns to the table. It was a small step in the right direction but the storm is full steam ahead. |
Originally Posted by IBPilot
(Post 1445311)
well for one, you aren't dealing with Delta....:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by MrMustache
(Post 1445304)
HA and all the 9E cheerleaders were adament that everyone would cave. Not quite ;)
No one here at Pinnacle wishes the decisions we had to make on any other carrier. Some here suggested the other regional MEC's should come to our aid before the vote, but the gallery was silent. |
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 1445321)
The Eagle MEC voted exactly how should have, much like the countless offers from management the 9E MEC, negotiating committee and 9E pilot group refused. Just because your management brought 9E into this argument doesn't mean 9E is the cause of what US Air is asking. Pinnacle held the line for years before gaining an industry leading contract and then being forced into bankruptcy with concessions.
No one here at Pinnacle wishes the decisions we had to make on any other carrier. Some here suggested the other regional MEC's should come to our aid before the vote, but the gallery was silent. 9E IS the problem. You voted more than half of your selves out of a job and the rest for horrible wages. Delta bragged about how they got you to do it and the rest of the industry liked it. 9E started this. ZERO doubt about that. 9E's previous contract was hardly industry leading. Payrates not much better if at all than ASA and worse than XJT. Name a "leading" aspect of that contract that ASA or ExpressJet didn't have for years before that. |
Excellent, now how about ALPA and APA working together to make this place worth coming to.
|
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 1445321)
No one here at Pinnacle wishes the decisions we had to make on any other carrier. Some here suggested the other regional MEC's should come to our aid before the vote, but the gallery was silent. |
Originally Posted by bonesbrigade
(Post 1445514)
I suppose that everyone conveniently forgets this little snippet...
|
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 1445321)
The Eagle MEC voted exactly how should have, much like the countless offers from management the 9E MEC, negotiating committee and 9E pilot group refused. Just because your management brought 9E into this argument doesn't mean 9E is the cause of what US Air is asking. Pinnacle held the line for years before gaining an industry leading contract and then being forced into bankruptcy with concessions.
No one here at Pinnacle wishes the decisions we had to make on any other carrier. Some here suggested the other regional MEC's should come to our aid before the vote, but the gallery was silent. |
The majors are bringing down the "top scale" regional costs - the expensive crews. Delta's highest Regional cockpit crew cost is $160.00 / flight hour as compared to $135 / flight hour at GoJets. Endeavor is not the lowest.
Future crew planning prompts them to level FOs at about the five year point - assuming they will shortly move into the left seat with higher pay. They will also try and level captains pay at about the twelve year point assuming a majority of them will have moved on to the majors by then. There will be screaming, gnashing of teeth, foot dragging, game blaming, threats and promises of martyrdom and statements of "take one for the team." I think most of you should study the Endeavor (Pinnacle) pay scale and start your future financial planning. |
Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot
(Post 1445651)
The majors are bringing down the "top scale" regional costs - the expensive crews. Delta's highest Regional cockpit crew cost is $160.00 / flight hour as compared to $135 / flight hour at GoJets. Endeavor is not the lowest.
Future crew planning prompts them to level FOs at about the five year point - assuming they will shortly move into the left seat with higher pay. They will also try and level captains pay at about the twelve year point assuming a majority of them will have moved on to the majors by then. There will be screaming, gnashing of teeth, foot dragging, game blaming, threats and promises of martyrdom and statements of "take one for the team." I think most of you should study the Endeavor (Pinnacle) pay scale and start your future financial planning. |
Weak unions equals weak bargaining positions in which many in airline management see themselves as the predator seeking prey the airline employee.
|
Originally Posted by IBPilot
(Post 1445311)
well for one, you aren't dealing with Delta....:rolleyes:
|
Good for you Eagle Guys/Gals. The race to the bottom stops here. Now if air whiskey, Horizon, SKW/ASA XJT and heck even GoJets (its a stretch i know)stand firm in their belief of a livable wage we will have the upper hand. All the while 9E pilots scratch their heads wondering where their balls went...
|
Thank you Eagle Pilots... Now its our turn guys/gals to say no, pinnacle rates are not the norm, they're the bottom feeders....
|
Does anyone else find it ironic for management to request concessions from an under-compensated workforce? C'mon now, there's no reason for ANY pilot group to vote yet...you don't make enough money to offer any concessions. This stuff needs to make the front page of a few newspapers, they already had a San Francisco article following the SFO crash that talked about window washers making wages higher than regional FO's...think their rate was $20 something an hour, and they don't have a 1,000 limit. Not to mention how many windows you can clean on the side ;)
|
I'm sure you're all aware of Eagles Vote which may have sealed their fate. If our airlines accepts "Pinnacle payrates as the new norm" we as a pilot group have positively sealed Eagles fate. Eagle pilots took a stand and now it's our turn to do the same for them. If we collectively say no as a pilot group albeit SKW/XJT, RAH, Air Wisc, PSA ect... We can start gaining back what this profession has already taken from us. The requirements for entry into 121 are higher than ever and we should be compensated as such...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands