Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Fatties dodged a bullet...for now... >

Fatties dodged a bullet...for now...

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Fatties dodged a bullet...for now...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2013, 12:45 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

Originally Posted by lifter123 View Post
This could burden the GA population in a big way. I'm assuming the guidelines apply to all classes of medicals??

I knew a guy a couple years ago. Local private pilot, owned a 172 and had been flying for years. He wasn't skinny by any means, but your typical 45 year old American, I guess. OKC deferred his medical pending a sleep apnea study. The test was over $4000. He just said f** it and sold his plane.

My guess is that a lot of recreational type flyers would do the same if faced with the same situation. Another expense that will put GA out of reach.
Why is it the burden of the pilot to prove he is healthy? If a government entity needs a physical done, said entity should be required to foot the bill. A friend of mine had to spend $1000s of dollars in psychiatrist bills to prove to the FAA he was no crazy because of an erroneous failed drug test 15 years prior. How is that fair?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 01:00 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Why is it the burden of the pilot to prove he is healthy? If a government entity needs a physical done, said entity should be required to foot the bill. A friend of mine had to spend $1000s of dollars in psychiatrist bills to prove to the FAA he was no crazy because of an erroneous failed drug test 15 years prior. How is that fair?
Part of it is called the safety of the traveling public.
I'm sure you wouldn't say a thing if a loved one was involved in an incident/accident involving an airliner and the PIC had a known mental disability that had been diagnosed and ignored.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 01:36 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

I think his point is that if the FAA wants an OSA test, the FAA should pay for it. That seems fair enough to me.
Packrat is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 01:45 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Why is it the burden of the pilot to prove he is healthy? If a government entity needs a physical done, said entity should be required to foot the bill. A friend of mine had to spend $1000s of dollars in psychiatrist bills to prove to the FAA he was no crazy because of an erroneous failed drug test 15 years prior. How is that fair?
Because flying is a privilege, in addition to what's been said already. They don't hand out pilot certificates to everyone that has a birth certificate either, you have to "prove" you meet the standards and are competent. You should see how many thousands of dollars this costs! Not fair at all!
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 01:53 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by pengu View Post
Alcohol and tobacco use on your private time will next.
They will come to your home at any time without advance
notice, and you must provide a sample, all in the name
of "safety".
See, somebody gets what these radical liberals are about. This testing was never about fatties. The guy said he intended to have every pilot tested, every pilot. It just opens the door for the next test they want to add to eliminate a problem that's never been attributed to any accidents in a US part 121 air carrier. Safest industry travel record in the world and this is the crap they come up with on taxpayer money?
We need more sequestering.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 02:17 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Captain
Posts: 173
Default

I can't speak for GA, but with commercial airline pilots, don't we have at least 2 pilots for a reason? Just in case something happens to one, you have the other? You can't always know when somebody is going to check out just from a BMI rating. Another reason FO's are so underpaid, if something happens to the captain...the FO becomes the PIC doesn't he/she?
WarpSpeed is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 02:17 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by HeavyDriver View Post
5'8" and 230lbs....I guess the fact that I'm 47 years old says I'm a fatty...but the 1500lb leg press, 405lbs free squat, 405lbs bench press, and 60 minutes of cardio helps keep that waistline in check...but if the FAA says I'm too fat to fly...Long term disability here I come...wahoo!
Same boat but I'm 5'9" and 242. You won't have to worry about OSA - your joints will implode first from all that weight -
Seriously though when I was in the Air Force in 1988 (as a Firefighter not a pilot) my max allowable weight was increased twice by waiver via a true body fat check. Allowable at the time was 188 I believe. Starved myself to meet the requirement at first which was unhealthy. Eventually got a medical waiver because of my size and build. Would you rather have the Crash Fire Rescue guy that has got the guns to lift your disabled self out of the burning cockpit (kind of like a 1 rep max) or the guy that can run 26.2 with a BMI of 12 and can't bench 180#?

Side note - I did do the 26.2 at 221lbs in the Marine Corp Marathon in 2007. In took me 5hr and 45 min. I still prefer the 1 rep max leg press to egress the aircraft followed by a 30 second sprint to clear the fire zone.
Std Deviation is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 02:21 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

I did have an OSA test last year (voluntarily) because my wife was concerned that I was not breathing for periods of time at night. I also never seemed to feel rested. The whole thing (wired up at a sleep center and being observed on camera all night) was a $40 co pay. Have no idea what the insurance company paid. Results indicated negative.
Std Deviation is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 02:48 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
Because flying is a privilege, in addition to what's been said already. They don't hand out pilot certificates to everyone that has a birth certificate either, you have to "prove" you meet the standards and are competent. You should see how many thousands of dollars this costs! Not fair at all!
You are 100% correct that it is a privilege. For commercial pilots, however, it is also how you make a living. I'm not saying you shouldn't be disqualified if you have a disqualifying condition because of safety, but to what end? If the FAA is going to mandate testing above what is already required and in the past you have demonstrated you have met that standard, then the FAA needs to foot the bill. It shouldn't be permitted that the government arbitrarily imposes new regulations that end up costing us more money. If you do something that puts your certificate in jeopardy, that is your fault and the government should not be liable.

What will you do when the FAA comes to you and says that since X% of people over the age of 50 are more prone to arthritis? They say you risk not being able to control the aircraft so we need to have you send a copy of a MRI of every joint to the FAA once a year. There is no way your medical coverage would not cover that. Where does it stop? Family history? Can they make you pay for at CAT scan because your dad had a brain tumor? This isn't about meeting the health portion of the medical. This is about radical moves that could potentially cost pilots THOUSANDS of dollars. All for what? Because there is a 2% chance that fatigue caused by OSA at the end of a long day might be one of 40 contributing factors to an accident?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 03:14 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 480
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
In any case, this is just like one of those yahoo articles where "plus sized models" with no tone or general fitness are featured, and then every fat lazy woman on the planet comes into the thread to defend them.

While you have a point, (and a hilarious one at that) bodybuilding is not the same as being some fat lazy woman.
JohnnyG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bintynogin
Horizon Air
7
05-02-2007 04:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices