|
CRJ was designed by idiots to be flown by geniuses, while the ERJ was designed by geniuses to be flown by idiots :)
...In case your sarcasm detector is deferred, I'm being sarcastic ;) |
Originally Posted by Pullout
(Post 1539875)
No such thing as an ERJ 170/175/190. ERJ died with the ERJ145. Embraer has rebranded the 170/175/190 as the 'EJet'.
|
Uh oh, those of us with "ERJ170" and "ERJ190" type ratings had better contact OKC to get those fixed......:D
|
Originally Posted by rvr1800
(Post 1540590)
Not true. I know the 190 is referred to as an ERJ in many different places.
My type rating says "ERJ-170; ERJ-190" |
I don't care what I actually fly, as others have said, whatever pays the most or gives the best QOL. But whatever you end up flying, chances are you will end up deadheading frequently in the back. As far as pax comfort, e170, e145, crj2, crj7, crj9 in that order. Having to wait in the crammed jetway with 70 other people for your bag is for the birds. Also I'm not a fan of the negative pitch of the seats while taxiing in to crj7/9. The single seat to yourself on the e145s are underrated.
|
Originally Posted by JerkStore
(Post 1539491)
If you had the option of choosing either the CRJ or the ERJ during training for Airline X, which one would you chose and why?
|
Like others have mentioned, if it's a CRJ, it would have to be either the 700 or 900. If it's an ERJ, then it would be the 195. Why you ask? Just a personal preference!
atp |
Originally Posted by atpwannabe
(Post 1540962)
Like others have mentioned, if it's a CRJ, it would have to be either the 700 or 900. If it's an ERJ, then it would be the 195. Why you ask? Just a personal preference!
atp |
Lol love the shiny jet guys saying that the 200 700 900 are diff. they are the same. get a life
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands