![]() |
Regional hiring times
Hello-
Curious if anyone would be willing to share what kind of flight time/experience they have been getting hired with and at what regional airlines. Basically I am wondering if once you have ATP mins you are good to go or do you need more than that. Thanks in advance. |
Regional hiring times
You will be good to go. From what I've been reading, you will be able to interview and get a conditional job offer even before you meet ATP mins.
|
1500 hrs & a pulse.
|
Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
(Post 1600048)
1500 hrs & a pulse.
|
You will start hearing from airlines well before mins. I'm sitting ~1280 and already have a job offer and 2 offers to interview. From what I've heard from friends of mine, things start picking up after 1300
|
I talked to a new hire Air Wisconsin guy today. He said he has the ATP mins but doesn't have an ATP. I assume he will get it on his type ride during initial training.
|
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 1600351)
I talked to a new hire Air Wisconsin guy today. He said he has the ATP mins but doesn't have an ATP. I assume he will get it on his type ride during initial training.
|
Regional hiring times
Several carriers are still requiring multi engine experience beyond the 50 (or 25+25 sim) required for the ATP-AMEL. SkyWest and Compass, to name two. SkyWest will interview with straight ATP mins, but no class date til you have 100 ME. Compass also wants at least 100. Republic and Eagle want 50 ME, they aren't accepting 25+25.
So if anyone can contribute to a list of who's requiring what in the multi column, that'd be useful I think. Carriers I know for certain that will hire with 25+25: --Piedmont --ExpressJet --Cape Air |
Originally Posted by CrakPipeOvrheat
(Post 1600043)
You will be good to go. From what I've been reading, you will be able to interview and get a conditional job offer even before you meet ATP mins.
|
Originally Posted by rcfd13
(Post 1600375)
Companies doing that probably aren't the ones you want to be working for. There's a reason they're desperate.
|
Don't be deceived. They are all desperate. Some more than others and some sweating bullets. If you are close to the mins, apply and interview. Go to wwww.aviationinterviews.com and study up. Read a book or two and get your first interview suit and tie and enjoy the ride.
|
Originally Posted by rcfd13
(Post 1600375)
Companies doing that probably aren't the ones you want to be working for. There's a reason they're desperate.
|
At some point multi engine time won't even be required outside of the few hours to get the rating.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1600408)
At some point multi engine time won't even be required outside of the few hours to get the rating.
|
Originally Posted by Grrrr
(Post 1600387)
What's so bad about that? Get the interview and everything out of the way so you can just hit 1500 and schedule a class right away. Everybody is hiring, I don't see the issue with expediting the process by interviewing a couple hundred hours in advance. Although receiving an email with a class date without even doing a phone interview is a bit strange...
|
Agreed. When they start repeatedly calling and emailing job offers it definitely raises some red flags. Sadly that strategy works on a lot of ppl I think. I have friends that went to certain airlines just bc the had COEs and it was easy.
|
I understand the reasoning behind wanting to find out who hires at bare minimums...but maybe those guys should be looking at the individual threads to see what kind of places they are before they either: sign a TRA, move or just spend time with generally unhappy people at the beginning of their professional career.
I may be wrong in thinking this way, but spend more time researching the companies than trolling for the restricted ATP carriers... Just my .02 |
Originally Posted by flyingmau5
(Post 1600377)
Actually, the ones that are desperate have sign-on bonuses.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1600408)
At some point multi engine time won't even be required outside of the few hours to get the rating.
|
Originally Posted by Grrrr
(Post 1600387)
What's so bad about that? Get the interview and everything out of the way so you can just hit 1500 and schedule a class right away. Everybody is hiring, I don't see the issue with expediting the process by interviewing a couple hundred hours in advance. Although receiving an email with a class date without even doing a phone interview is a bit strange...
|
Originally Posted by ClarenceOver
(Post 1600487)
If they were desperate wouldn't they relax the training a little bit and try to get someone through rather than giving them a checkride in 8 sims?
|
How many hours equals to 8 sim sessions?
|
A sim session is generally 2 hours. Someone correct me if i am wrong.
|
Originally Posted by rcfd13
(Post 1600493)
Do most regionals have more than 8? When I was a new hire at a different regional we had 5 sim sessions then 6 and 7 were the checkride. I figured 5 was on the low side but somewhere between 5 and 10 was the norm.
|
Originally Posted by rcfd13
(Post 1600493)
Do most regionals have more than 8? When I was a new hire at a different regional we had 5 sim sessions then 6 and 7 were the checkride. I figured 5 was on the low side but somewhere between 5 and 10 was the norm.
|
Originally Posted by ClarenceOver
(Post 1600488)
How? 50 multi is mandatory for insurance isn't it?
§61.159 Aeronautical experience: Airplane category rating. (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a person who is applying for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category and class rating must have at least 1,500 hours of total time as a pilot that includes at least: (1) 500 hours of cross-country flight time. (2) 100 hours of night flight time. (3) 50 hours of flight time in the class of airplane for the rating sought. A maximum of 25 hours of training in a full flight simulator representing the class of airplane for the rating sought may be credited toward the flight time requirement of this paragraph if the training was accomplished as part of an approved training course in parts 121, 135, 141, or 142 of this chapter. A flight training device or aviation training device may not be used to satisfy this requirement. |
Originally Posted by ClarenceOver
(Post 1600540)
A sim session is generally 2 hours. Someone correct me if i am wrong.
|
Talk about getting off topic. I find it funny how this thread creator wanted to know what kind of time people are getting hired with and not a single person has actually answered it. Page 3
|
Originally Posted by Blackwing
(Post 1600367)
So if anyone can contribute to a list of who's requiring what in the multi column, that'd be useful I think.
Carriers I know for certain that will hire with 25+25: --Piedmont --ExpressJet --Cape Air Does anyone know what Air Wisconsin, PSA, or Endeavor interview/hire with? |
Originally Posted by madeinUSA
(Post 1600606)
Talk about getting off topic. I find it funny how this thread creator wanted to know what kind of time people are getting hired with and not a single person has actually answered it. Page 3
First look at the places offering sign on bonuses with 1 to 2 year leashes costing about what first year pay will be. Those places want warm bodies. If you want a job working for a regional where you won't hide your wings while strolling the airport - then avoid the dangling carrot of money up front to get it in the rear. |
Originally Posted by Kill Switch
(Post 1600637)
What he's asking is where he can apply and get an offer without having 1500 hours.
First look at the places offering sign on bonuses with 1 to 2 year leashes costing about what first year pay will be. Those places want warm bodies. If you want a job working for a regional where you won't hide your wings while strolling the airport - then avoid the dangling carrot of money up front to get it in the rear. |
If you're close to mins (as listed on the company's website) and are interested in working for that company, send them a resume. Worst they'll say is "no thanks".
If the company is hard on the 50 hours or 100 hours of multi-engine time expect that it'll be a stipulation if they're nice enough to offer you an interview. To whoever asked why airlines limit sim sessions to 8 as opposed to "train to pass" I'm sure part of it is liability. If 85% of the pilots hired can accomplish their training satisfactorily in 8 sessions the other 15% aren't the pilots "we" want working for "our" company. If the company trained those 15% of pilots with additional sessions, some lawyer would likely say "isn't it true that this pilot wasn't ready in the average amount of sim sessions?" and then "Do you hire substandard pilots knowingly?" followed by "That's why [your company here] is liable for $XX Million in damages" |
Originally Posted by Redstone256
(Post 1600634)
Good info!
Does anyone know what Air Wisconsin, PSA, or Endeavor interview/hire with? For what it's worth I have just shy of 200 ME, and will qualify for an unrestricted at 1500 with over 500 XC if that even matters. No ATP written yet. |
Originally Posted by Grrrr
(Post 1600817)
Got an invite to interview with PSA ~1275, Endeavor told me to keep building time and they'd speak to me in the future. No app in with AWAC yet.
For what it's worth I have just shy of 200 ME, and will qualify for an unrestricted at 1500 with over 500 XC if that even matters. No ATP written yet. |
No I am not in that area. Got invited to come to CLT.
|
Originally Posted by Grrrr
(Post 1600843)
No I am not in that area. Got invited to come to CLT.
|
Originally Posted by Redstone256
(Post 1600634)
Good info!
Does anyone know what Air Wisconsin, PSA, or Endeavor interview/hire with? |
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1600729)
To whoever asked why airlines limit sim sessions to 8 as opposed to "train to pass" I'm sure part of it is liability. If 85% of the pilots hired can accomplish their training satisfactorily in 8 sessions the other 15% aren't the pilots "we" want working for "our" company. If the company trained those 15% of pilots with additional sessions, some lawyer would likely say "isn't it true that this pilot wasn't ready in the average amount of sim sessions?" and then "Do you hire substandard pilots knowingly?" followed by "That's why [your company here] is liable for $XX Million in damages"
|
Originally Posted by NormalAbnormal
(Post 1601238)
In addition to the liability, the simulator is a very valuable asset. The company can't afford to be using it for remedial training on a regular basis. Those resources used to "train to pass" could be diverted to people the company is pretty sure can complete the training program as intended. It results in a higher throughput in the training department and a better ROI.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands