Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
American to Shrink Regional Carrier >

American to Shrink Regional Carrier

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

American to Shrink Regional Carrier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2014, 09:03 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by Bellanca View Post
This, I'm sitting at 1225 hours and with my instructing job it will be a good 5-7 months before I will have the hours to legally work for any regional carrier, and airlines have been chomping at the bit to call me in for an interview. I have three interviews scheduled in April. Granted, none of the airlines I'm interviewing at are my top choices, but I think it shows that the industry is hurting for pilots - at least right now.
Enjoy!

You are getting in a at a good time.
Your number one selection criteria should be, LARGE crew base in your home town, or with a short easy commute, less than 1.5 hrs flight and 20+ flights per day.
After that should be Pay and QOL.

Remember the company that looks good now in terms of pay, growth, and time to Captain, may not be good in a few years.
You cant control the direction or the management of a company.

Consider, Home town or short easy commute first, everything else is secondary and you have no control over it.
Freeflyfreak is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 02:52 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CR7 Capt
Posts: 1,621
Default

Originally Posted by bailee atr View Post
How quickly can they shrink AE is the question.
95% of our pilots have furlough protection.
Our current Captains, have Captain pay protection incase of displacements.
The only way to shrink has to be from the top. Accelerate the flow through, is the only way to shrink AE quickly.
Would you care to elaborate on that statement, as a capt awaiting IOE, your saying if I get displaced back to FO, I keep my Capt Pay? I must have missed that in the contract..
ERJ135 is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 03:07 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John 3:16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by Freeflyfreak View Post
Consider, Home town or short easy commute first, everything else is secondary and you have no control over it.
Thanks freefly, that's some good gouge for us noobs
John 3:16 is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 03:52 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ135 View Post
Would you care to elaborate on that statement, as a capt awaiting IOE, your saying if I get displaced back to FO, I keep my Capt Pay? I must have missed that in the contract..
I think baile ATR means if you get displaced out of seniority order and someone junior to you is still a CA then you are pay protected. This is uncommon but it could happen.

Other than that there isn't any pay protection on our contract against displacements.
AllisonRR is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 03:53 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

Congratulations Bellanca. That is awesome. Pick the one that affords you the opportunity to live in domicile and offers the best QOL. Like others have said, you are in a good position to be choosy.
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:33 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 320 fo
Posts: 160
Default Letter 13-02

The letter does have CA pay protection however the company has to be employing excess pilots because of. 95% protection and then. 50% are pay protected even if only 40% are actually sitting in the left seat
It's in letter 13-02 section 3
Maverick is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:58 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bailee atr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: ATR72
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by Maverick View Post
The letter does have CA pay protection however the company has to be employing excess pilots because of. 95% protection and then. 50% are pay protected even if only 40% are actually sitting in the left seat
It's in letter 13-02 section 3
Sorry I did answer back, but Mavericks statement is correct.

To clear up any confusion.
95% of total pilots are furlough protected.
50% of total pilots, which would be 100% of the Captains. They are pay protected.
The other 50% would be the FOs. Which obviously would not be pay protected because they are FOs.
bailee atr is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 03:31 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CR7 Capt
Posts: 1,621
Default

Originally Posted by bailee atr View Post
Sorry I did answer back, but Mavericks statement is correct.

To clear up any confusion.
95% of total pilots are furlough protected.
50% of total pilots, which would be 100% of the Captains. They are pay protected.
The other 50% would be the FOs. Which obviously would not be pay protected because they are FOs.
Ok, thanks...
ERJ135 is offline  
Old 04-03-2014, 05:46 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Default

Can you please explain furlough protection? It makes since that they couldn’t limit the flow and furlough. Outside of a flow, what does furlough protection offer? Does it mean pilots must take leave or can't pick up open time if pilots are on furlough? If Eagle had 3100*95%= 2945 pilots cannot be furloughed even if they park ships?
Waitingformins is offline  
Old 04-03-2014, 07:06 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins View Post
Can you please explain furlough protection? It makes since that they couldn’t limit the flow and furlough. Outside of a flow, what does furlough protection offer? Does it mean pilots must take leave or can't pick up open time if pilots are on furlough? If Eagle had 3100*95%= 2945 pilots cannot be furloughed even if they park ships?
It's not 95% of the current pilots it was 95% as of the day of signing. As people leave they could theoretically furlough, however they would then be unable to meter flows and the flow % increases.

Furlough protection was a Team Tony idea, they traded a concrete fleet plan for that garbage.
Bzzt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
Sniper
Major
2
12-30-2011 07:50 AM
Tsuda
American
0
12-18-2011 06:10 PM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices