![]() |
Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30
(Post 1817245)
This is incorrect. We're still getting min guarantee of 75 hrs per agreement with the company.
As lousy as this place is some days, at least give out accurate info vs out and out lies and exaggeration. |
And the company changes your guarantee if you trade trips...so if you have an 80 hour line, swap with another crew member to a 77 hour line, and you lose a day of pay now you only get paid 72 hours.
|
So did RAH and the union definitely reduce negotiations to once a month or is it just proposed that that is what the company wants to do as of now. Most of the folks ive spoken too seem quite optimistic that a new contract will be in place to vote on by the end of first quarter to mid summer the latest. I was told a mediator(s) will make the final call as too how many meetings will take place per month. With the announcement of Shuttle getting the 50 175s, is it possible new contract will be out for vote prior to the first plane coming on property?
|
^^^^ ha ha and pigs will fly to Mars :D
|
Originally Posted by scudrunner13
(Post 1817307)
So did RAH and the union definitely reduce negotiations to once a month or is it just proposed that that is what the company wants to do as of now. Most of the folks ive spoken too seem quite optimistic that a new contract will be in place to vote on by the end of first quarter to mid summer the latest. I was told a mediator(s) will make the final call as too how many meetings will take place per month. With the announcement of Shuttle getting the 50 175s, is it possible new contract will be out for vote prior to the first plane coming on property?
Management rejected the NC's FO pay raise LOA, is trying and will most likely park the 145's early to staff 170's(which will perpetuate our 7 year+ upgrade), has basically withdrew from negotiations and according to our NC has begun making it difficult for pilots to go to other companies with respect to PRIA requests. The United birds coming to Shuttle has no bearing on anything other than possibly providing new bases for our guys that live out west. |
Originally Posted by scudrunner13
(Post 1817307)
So did RAH and the union definitely reduce negotiations to once a month or is it just proposed that that is what the company wants to do as of now. Most of the folks ive spoken too seem quite optimistic that a new contract will be in place to vote on by the end of first quarter to mid summer the latest. I was told a mediator(s) will make the final call as too how many meetings will take place per month. With the announcement of Shuttle getting the 50 REPLACEMENT 175s, is it possible new contract will be out for vote prior to the first plane coming on property?
and fixed it for ya |
Originally Posted by scudrunner13
(Post 1817307)
So did RAH and the union definitely reduce negotiations to once a month or is it just proposed that that is what the company wants to do as of now. Most of the folks ive spoken too seem quite optimistic that a new contract will be in place to vote on by the end of first quarter to mid summer the latest. I was told a mediator(s) will make the final call as too how many meetings will take place per month. With the announcement of Shuttle getting the 50 175s, is it possible new contract will be out for vote prior to the first plane coming on property?
|
[QUOTE=basesjuiced;1817333
Management rejected the NC's FO pay raise LOA, is trying and will most likely park the 145's early to staff 170's(which will perpetuate our 7 year+ upgrade), has basically withdrew from negotiations and according to our NC has begun making it difficult for pilots to go to other companies with respect to PRIA requests. The United birds coming to Shuttle has no bearing on anything other than possibly providing new bases for our guys that live out west.[/QUOTE] What does pria has anything to do with going to other companies? I thought the 175 was replacing the q400. So wouldnt they displace the Q pilots to the 175? |
This week: 1. Cancel 145 upgrade class 2. Reduce bilateral negotiation meetings 3. Announce replacement planes (not growth) to different certificate = hoses 100s of pilots 4. Announce worse flight benefits than last year 5. Culture change checklist - Complete. Standby for next week's episode of BB Cares. Avoid this place like the plague. Eight years of negotiations should tell you how much BB gives a **** about pilots at his company. The same goes for the new guy they brought in to talk us all into dropping our pitchforks. |
Originally Posted by scudrunner13
(Post 1817307)
So did RAH and the union definitely reduce negotiations to once a month or is it just proposed that that is what the company wants to do as of now. Most of the folks ive spoken too seem quite optimistic that a new contract will be in place to vote on by the end of first quarter to mid summer the latest. I was told a mediator(s) will make the final call as too how many meetings will take place per month. With the announcement of Shuttle getting the 50 175s, is it possible new contract will be out for vote prior to the first plane coming on property?
Management rejected the NC's FO pay raise LOA, is trying and will most likely park the 145's early to staff 170's(which will perpetuate our 7 year+ upgrade), has basically withdrew from negotiations and according to our NC has begun making it difficult for pilots to go to other companies with respect to PRIA requests. The United birds coming to Shuttle has no bearing on anything other than possibly providing new bases for our guys that live out west. |
Originally Posted by lgaflyer
(Post 1817375)
What does pria has anything to do with going to other companies?
I thought the 175 was replacing the q400. So wouldnt they displace the Q pilots to the 175? |
Originally Posted by lgaflyer
(Post 1817375)
What does pria has anything to do with going to other companies?
I thought the 175 was replacing the q400. So wouldnt they displace the Q pilots to the 175? |
Originally Posted by LAXSAAB
(Post 1817503)
Sounds spiteful, but I'm sure they have only one employee working on PRIA request.
|
Originally Posted by LAXSAAB
(Post 1817503)
Sounds spiteful, but I'm sure they have only one employee working on PRIA request.
Like I have said before, RAH HR operates as if it still thinks that pilots are begging to come to work there. Good luck on getting a contract by summer. I would just love to see the NMB release you guys and watch Bedford lose control just for an evening. The guy is a first class douche bag. |
Originally Posted by Ronaldo
(Post 1816981)
This week:
1. Cancel 145 upgrade class 2. Reduce bilateral negotiation meetings 3. Announce replacement planes (not growth) to different certificate = hoses 100s of pilots 4. Announce worse flight benefits than last year 5. Culture change checklist - Complete. Standby for next week's episode of BB Cares. Avoid this place like the plague. Eight years of negotiations should tell you how much BB gives a **** about pilots at his company. The same goes for the new guy they brought in to talk us all into dropping our pitchforks. |
Originally Posted by LAXSAAB
(Post 1817503)
Sounds spiteful, but I'm sure they have only one employee working on PRIA request.
Like I have said before, RAH HR operates as if it still thinks that pilots are begging to come to work there. Good luck on getting a contract by summer. I would just love to see the NMB release you guys and watch Bedford lose control just for an evening. The guy is a first class douche bag. |
With all I hear about RAH, Our they still recruiting and filling classes?
|
Originally Posted by prop1900
(Post 1817975)
With all I hear about RAH, Our they still recruiting and filling classes?
Yes. Filler. |
With all I hear about RAH, Our they still recruiting and filling classes? |
At least you guys voted out the extra assessment from IBT.
|
Originally Posted by LAXSAAB
(Post 1817992)
At least you guys voted out the extra assessment from IBT.
Nope. Still here. Just capped. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by LAXSAAB
(Post 1817992)
At least you guys voted out the extra assessment from IBT.
|
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 1818617)
Yeah, we royally screwed the pooch with that assessment crap. It's just a teamster fund that will continue on in perpetuity. Maybe we'll get a subscription to Toothless Trucker Babes magazine.
|
Originally Posted by Loon
(Post 1818749)
Were you one of the many fools that voted for it? If so, please don't whine about it. Amazing how dumb everyone was to have the wool pulled over their eyes with that one. You all aren't very smart, are you? Disclaimer: if you voted against it, I take this back. Otherwise, you're a dummy like the rest!!
Now we're stuck with a permanent tax on our stupidity. The only way to get rid of it is for IBT to call a special election to get rid of it. I have better odds of winning the Powerball and MegaMillions lotteries simultaneously than the teamsters giving up the coin. It's a good thing I bought a lotto ticket last week. |
The Toonsters suck! I proudly voted no both times. They already take over a grand a year from me. I don't want to give the dip$hits one penny more. It's all a big joke and we're the punchline. You yes voting fools have that last TA for your return on investment. Fools. . .
|
Does anyone know if the q400 pilots will be displaced to S5?
|
Originally Posted by lgaflyer
(Post 1819886)
Does anyone know if the q400 pilots will be displaced to S5?
The Q400s are not going away overnight, and the replacement E175s are not arriving overnight. The last of the Q400s will be gone at the end of summer 2016 and the E175 deliveries for (for UAL flying) will go until August 2017. Whether displacements from the Q400 occur is entirely dependent on the rate at which pilots leave the equipment voluntarily. For example, if every Q400 CA bids off for the jet via a vacancy, there would be zero displacements. In fact, if too many Q400 pilots bid off via vacancy, they could theoretically have run some Q400 CA vacancies. This is occurring now on the E145, even though all the contracts will expire by the end of 2016. And the company benefits TREMENDOUSLY from vacancies because they would not have to pay those pilots moving expenses. Inevitably, some Q400 CAs will wait to be displaced since they might hold better relative seniority in base on the Q. I am already seeing a TON of Q400 CAs bidding off via vacancy and going to class for the E170 at YX (not S5). So you will see guys going to both certificates. As for the Q400 FOs (as I suspect you are most interested) the company has them by the balls. The only way they will allow you off the Q400 is by waiving the contractual provision that freezes you in type until upgrade OR through displacement. You can NOT bit on a vacancy position as an FO unless it's the same type and certificate that you are currently working. Initially, I expect the Q400 FOs based in the east bases (EWR, PIT) to accept voluntary displacement to both YX and S5, the Q400s FOs based in DEN and MCI will probably stick around unless they allow a displacement to the YX MCI E170 base. So in short, there will be displacements from the Q400 FO side, but based on your seniority (and how others bid), you could end up at YX or S5. There is really no control and it will amount to luck if you end up getting displaced to a certificate you want to be on. |
there are 70 FO vacancies open for RAH...holy poop
that should let you know how bad it has gotten |
NC throwing in the towel?
That's the impression I got from their latest update.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands