![]() |
Would explain why AAG is now focusing on CVG and PSA is opening a base there. Sounds like it will only continue to grow.
We all know that regional's are going to shrink. There simply is no other option if mainline starts taking pilots at the rate they are predicted to. Potentially painful times ahead for some. I expect we'll see the airlines that exclusively fly props and 50 seat jets to either fold up shop or be bought for their pilots by other airlines. Perhaps it will be a good thing to work for a wholly-owned airline in the coming 5 years? Who knows... |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 1994825)
Would explain why AAG is now focusing on CVG and PSA is opening a base there. Sounds like it will only continue to grow.
We all know that regional's are going to shrink. There simply is no other option if mainline starts taking pilots at the rate they are predicted to. Potentially painful times ahead for some. I expect we'll see the airlines that exclusively fly props and 50 seat jets to either fold up shop or be bought for their pilots by other airlines. Perhaps it will be a good thing to work for a wholly-owned airline in the coming 5 years? Who knows... I think wholly owned will have a little bit of an advantage. But generally speaking i think most of us are in a good position. There is going to be a lot of mainline jobs coming up. Better QOL at regionals due to upgrading etc as well. The lost decade is just something that is impossible to forget. |
Originally Posted by ThreeStripe
(Post 1994815)
You guys paint this as a bad thing. Think about the bennies of working from a ground station. Home every night, no more crappy food, no more hotels with bedbugs, no more radiation, and best of all, no skin in the game if the technology craps the bed. My last point is why it will never happen. Some group will figure out how to hack the controls and that will be the end of pilotless aircraft. Next.
|
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1994788)
Are you sure? Their multi-crew rating has been around for a while but isn't very common anymore.
In Europe they have the frozen ATPL, which is not an official term. It is slang for someone who has done their 14 ATPL exams and have their commercial and instrument ratings. The MPL is the same theory and 14 exams, but their license allows them to only fly a specific type for a specific company, and half of their training has been in level C or D sims (or the equivalent), and these guys can't even legally go out and fly a C172 without additional training and practical tests. I have taught guys in Europe and believe me, their system doesn't make them a better pilot than the FAA product, and guys with 170 hours total time are getting into the right hand seat of A320s and B737s over there. One low cost carrier that I know of thought they could save money by hiring low time guys and have them pay for type ratings. After a few dings and prangs with newbie FOs, they raised their hiring standards quite a bit in subsequent hiring. Under the MPL program, guys are getting into the right hand seat with 70-90 hours of total time in airplanes, and another 100 in sims or so. |
Originally Posted by zondaracer
(Post 1994837)
I have taught guys in Europe and believe me, their system doesn't make them a better pilot than the FAA product, and guys with 170 hours total time are getting into the right hand seat of A320s and B737s over there. |
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 1994847)
It doesn't matter who you are, where you are from, what you have learned, or even what you know- 170 hours is still 170 hours. Captains are largely on their own.
I think that was his point. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1994836)
Well what it DOES spell out is FEWER pilot jobs.
|
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1994836)
Well what it DOES spell out is FEWER pilot jobs.
|
Originally Posted by BizPilot
(Post 1994524)
Also, thanks to the 1,500 rule regionals are having a hard time getting pilots to work for $22/hr. The unintended consequences of the new law are coming home to roost. I recall that the two pilots on the BUF crash had > 2,000TT.
They both slept in the crew room all day because they lacked the money to live in EWR and afford a hotel/crashpad to go to. If they were paid more, I don't think they would have made the decision to sleep in the crashpad as easily as they did. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1994836)
Well what it DOES spell out is FEWER pilot jobs.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands