![]() |
AAL Increasing Fleet; DAL and UL Shrinking
Last week, American Airlines (NASDAQ:AAL) returned to a tried-and-true strategy to scrounge up more pilots for its regional carriers: big signing bonuses. Delta Air Lines (NYSE:DAL) and United Continental (NYSE:UAL) are taking a different approach, though. They are trying to reduce regional flying as much as possible. Read more here: The U.S. Pilot Shortage Continues to Rear Its Ugly Head -- The Motley Fool |
Originally Posted by MartinBishop
(Post 2147726)
|
Originally Posted by Gjn290
(Post 2147739)
:cool: Didn't even read the whole article. UAL and DL are growing mainline while shrinking regionals. Totally misleading title.
|
Originally Posted by Gjn290
(Post 2147739)
:cool: Didn't even read the whole article. UAL and DL are growing mainline while shrinking regionals. Totally misleading title.
|
AAG will likely follow the rest of the industry. As is usually the case though, being an industry follower as opposed to an industry leader, it will end up costing them more in the end.
The odd thing is, US Air was one of the first mainline companies to establish an E190 fleet. When Parker took over, he had a perfect opportunity to grow the fleet and fill the 90 - 110 seat market gap. Instead, he wasted millions trying to pressure the regional airlines into lower costs to only have market forces to require him to reverse almost every cost cutting initiative. AAG shareholders have paid him millions and he has accomplish nothing in two years. They should have paid him to sit in his office and do nothing and AAG would still be better off than it is today. |
They've also spent over $6 billion on stock buybacks in the last two years. Conceivably this helps to raise the stock price......but in this case it hasn't. It's a failed policy. The stock is at its 52 week low and flirting with all time low territory.
|
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 2147779)
AAG will likely follow the rest of the industry. As is usually the case though, being an industry follower as opposed to an industry leader, it will end up costing them more in the end.
The odd thing is, US Air was one of the first mainline companies to establish an E190 fleet. When Parker took over, he had a perfect opportunity to grow the fleet and fill the 90 - 110 seat market gap. Instead, he wasted millions trying to pressure the regional airlines into lower costs to only have market forces to require him to reverse almost every cost cutting initiative. AAG shareholders have paid him millions and he has accomplish nothing in two years. They should have paid him to sit in his office and do nothing and AAG would still be better off than it is today. |
Looks promising for envoy
|
Originally Posted by Ar Pilot
(Post 2147800)
While I don't understand what Parker is doing (besides being at the helm of an airline making billions of dollars), I love when pilots criticize airline management as if they're completely incompetent and are somehow inept.
|
Not sure how the 3 WO are doing with attracting pilot's, but me thinks Parkers path to the majors plan is going to fall flat. Not attracting enough pilots to even keep his regionals staffed.
|
Have a friend who works at PSA and says it's the worst career decision of his life. He said even Mesa would have been better for more reasons he could
List. He said he would never recommend anyone to an eagle Carrier?!?! |
Mesa doesn't have a flow , good insurance if it does ever workout
|
Originally Posted by Mistek89
(Post 2147875)
Mesa doesn't have a flow , good insurance if it does ever workout
|
We all know the 2.5/6 yr projection won't happen for a while , I am optimistic the flow might be possible in 8-10 yrs . All depends if they can hire or if they will flow everyone off property and close the doors or just staple everyone into the AA seniority list
|
Originally Posted by Ar Pilot
(Post 2147800)
While I don't understand what Parker is doing (besides being at the helm of an airline making billions of dollars), I love when pilots criticize airline management as if they're completely incompetent and are somehow inept.
Have you seen AAG's debt load recently along the stock buy-back scheme of buying stock back at substantially more then it's worth or how about doubling down on fleet choices that are becoming obsolete because of the inability to acquire a critical part (a First Officer) in opposition to the rest of the industry ? Just curious, but exactly what do you see as "competent" in regard to the majority of AAG's post merger moves ? |
IMHO, I believe the shortage at the WOs are because Parker and AAG in general have created such a hostile environment at the WOs that potential new hires avoid in favor of better pilot-management relations for an overall better QOL at a regional. For example, SkyWest and Endeavor, who are leading on the recruiting front.
|
Originally Posted by CrosswindSolo
(Post 2147943)
IMHO, I believe the shortage at the WOs are because Parker and AAG in general have created such a hostile environment at the WOs that potential new hires avoid in favor of better pilot-management relations for an overall better QOL at a regional. For example, SkyWest and Endeavor, who are leading on the recruiting front.
That and the fact there really aren't many pilots available to begin with. |
Originally Posted by deskflier
(Post 2147873)
Have a friend who works at PSA and says it's the worst career decision of his life. He said even Mesa would have been better for more reasons he could
List. He said he would never recommend anyone to an eagle Carrier?!?! |
Originally Posted by Ar Pilot
(Post 2147800)
While I don't understand what Parker is doing (besides being at the helm of an airline making billions of dollars), I love when pilots criticize airline management as if they're completely incompetent and are somehow inept.
|
Originally Posted by Ar Pilot
(Post 2147800)
While I don't understand what Parker is doing (besides being at the helm of an airline making billions of dollars), I love when pilots criticize airline management as if they're completely incompetent and are somehow inept.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2147992)
Yea I don't know about that. Sounds a little dramatic. If it's so bad it isn't too late for your friend to jump ship and head on over to Mesa.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2147967)
Parker doesn't dictate working environments at the WO's, the individual regional managements do. From what I've read, Envoy seems to stand apart as the airline with the most disregard for the interests of its pilots. The lack of new-hires looks to be more a function of the lack of candy (shiny new mini-Airbuses) at the three that the kids today crave.
That and the fact there really aren't many pilots available to begin with. Next on the list of what affects your QOL is whether or not you're on reserve or hold a line. You'll be happier as a lineholder living in base for a cr@ppy regional than you would commuting to reserve at the best regional there is. |
Originally Posted by 272922
(Post 2148092)
IMHO, the working environments at the regionals has far less to do with management and a lot more to do with if you commute or not.
Next on the list of what affects your QOL is whether or not you're on reserve or hold a line. You'll be happier as a lineholder living in base for a cr@ppy regional than you would commuting to reserve at the best regional there is. What other conclusion could one of rational mind come to ? |
Originally Posted by scottm
(Post 2148007)
Stock prices are a bit like yoga pants. If your fundamentals aren't good, this is where they will be revealed.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 2147749)
The article says as much as well. AAG isn't growing in the right sector. UAL/DL are moving in the right direction by removing most 50 seat lift and replacing it with mainline lift.
|
If the mainline "fleet" isn't growing..... the "fleet" isn't growing.
|
Originally Posted by 272922
(Post 2148092)
IMHO, the working environments at the regionals has far less to do with management and a lot more to do with if you commute or not.
Next on the list of what affects your QOL is whether or not you're on reserve or hold a line. You'll be happier as a lineholder living in base for a cr@ppy regional than you would commuting to reserve at the best regional there is. |
Originally Posted by iPilot6
(Post 2148162)
If the mainline "fleet" isn't growing..... the "fleet" isn't growing.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2147967)
Parker doesn't dictate working environments at the WO's, the individual regional managements do. From what I've read, Envoy seems to stand apart as the airline with the most disregard for the interests of its pilots. The lack of new-hires looks to be more a function of the lack of candy (shiny new mini-Airbuses) at the three that the kids today crave.
That and the fact there really aren't many pilots available to begin with. |
Originally Posted by CrosswindSolo
(Post 2148271)
Sh*t rolls down hill. I'm just saying. ;)
|
They better watch out for that backflush.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2148277)
True, but at some point the bottom of the hill is so encased in ****, there is no "downhill" anymore to roll to. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2147967)
Parker doesn't dictate working environments at the WO's, the individual regional managements do. From what I've read, Envoy seems to stand apart as the airline with the most disregard for the interests of its pilots. The lack of new-hires looks to be more a function of the lack of candy (shiny new mini-Airbuses) at the three that the kids today crave.
That and the fact there really aren't many pilots available to begin with. I heard one class had a few folks who quit because they didn't get the 175 like they were promised. |
tears are running down my cheeks, all due to laughing my *** off. ooooooo, the poor newbie jaffo.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 2147967)
Parker doesn't dictate working environments at the WO's, the individual regional managements do. From what I've read, Envoy seems to stand apart as the airline with the most disregard for the interests of its pilots. The lack of new-hires looks to be more a function of the lack of candy (shiny new mini-Airbuses) at the three that the kids today crave.
That and the fact there really aren't many pilots available to begin with. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:21 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands