Uh oh
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
You don’t commute so you don’t care....
Also, the issue with the “proposed” plan is that it is a demand. Jumpseat agreements are negotiated reciprocal agreements. This would violate that. Please educate yourself before posting nonsense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also, the issue with the “proposed” plan is that it is a demand. Jumpseat agreements are negotiated reciprocal agreements. This would violate that. Please educate yourself before posting nonsense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
So a signed agreement means nothing to you? Oh that’s right, you don’t commute.
You sound like you have ZERO integrity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Do you seriously believe that UA cannot force Republic management to agree to their proposal? What is the status quo worth to you? You can’t be that naive!
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
Yep sensitive little guy here. You got me.
You don’t think there could have POSSIBLY been a better way to handle this? I guess ****ing off thousands of pilots was the only way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Basically a letter addressed to UA Jumpseaters on Republic aircraft. Essentially it says we believe your MEC is violating our Jumpseat agreement and this could result in UA pilots not being allowed on Republic jumpseat. I would say it was written tactfully, but pretty direct. Sounds like the ALPA regionals will sit this out, but Skywest appears to be involved as well.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Looks like you only reply to post concerning this Jumpseat issue. All of your previous posts were either concerning Skywests JS letter, or on this thread. I mean sounds like you maybe on UA Jumpseat committed member or maybe even a line pilot. Of course I hope you know CASS has absolutely nothing to do with this issue. Regardless of the outcome Republic will still have CASS.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 440
I'm a 9/5 hire. Forgive me for being out of the loop, but I took the job KNOWING I was going to have to commute, at least for a little bit. I currently don't live in ANY RPA base, but I will eventually move to base after I pay off some of my debt. Anyway.... can you break this down barney style to me (and others) who have no idea what's going on, but will (potentially) be impacted by it?
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 351
I'm a 9/5 hire. Forgive me for being out of the loop, but I took the job KNOWING I was going to have to commute, at least for a little bit. I currently don't live in ANY RPA base, but I will eventually move to base after I pay off some of my debt. Anyway.... can you break this down barney style to me (and others) who have no idea what's going on, but will (potentially) be impacted by it?
#20
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 31
Looks like you only reply to post concerning this Jumpseat issue. All of your previous posts were either concerning Skywests JS letter, or on this thread. I mean sounds like you maybe on UA Jumpseat committed member or maybe even a line pilot. Of course I hope you know CASS has absolutely nothing to do with this issue. Regardless of the outcome Republic will still have CASS.
Anywho.. you’re understanding of cass is false. Republic doesn’t maintain CASS ( soon to be called FADaR ). It’s part of the reservation system and unless I’m mistaken republic doesn’t have one of those.