Uh oh
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Not going to happen. I don’t see a issue with the proposed UA plan. It only removes the TOC requirement, so not a big deal. Regardless I suspect a JS war would hurt UA just as much. My understanding is it would be all Republic aircraft, and not just the UAX birds. don’t commute though, so there’s that....
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 351
Lol fine, let them cancel the agreement. We’ll see how long it lasts when they realize there’s a lot more mainline guys commuting to ORD and EWR from BUF, MSP, SDF, etc. Good luck finding a 737 between ORD and and BUF regularly. Oh, and when they realize they can’t go down the terminal to commute on “American” because that’s still Republic maybe their tune will change.
#6
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 47
Wouldn't make a difference for most pilots with us anyways. Most of our group commutes from cities served by us and alot of UAL guys. United has a worthless non rev system and is consistently oversold in my experience. Ive flown with 777 captains who came up and said they had to buy confirmed seats to get on
#8
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 10
Lol fine, let them cancel the agreement. We’ll see how long it lasts when they realize there’s a lot more mainline guys commuting to ORD and EWR from BUF, MSP, SDF, etc. Good luck finding a 737 between ORD and and BUF regularly. Oh, and when they realize they can’t go down the terminal to commute on “American” because that’s still Republic maybe their tune will change.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
Not going to happen. I don’t see a issue with the proposed UA plan. It only removes the TOC requirement, so not a big deal. Regardless I suspect a JS war would hurt UA just as much. My understanding is it would be all Republic aircraft, and not just the UAX birds. don’t commute though, so there’s that....
You don’t commute so you don’t care....
Also, the issue with the “proposed” plan is that it is a demand. Jumpseat agreements are negotiated reciprocal agreements. This would violate that. Please educate yourself before posting nonsense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk