It's time
RPA has shown over and over and over that the only metric they truly care about is cost savings. Nothing else. Not quality of life, not fatigue risk management, not scheduling efficiency (in the eyes of crew members), etc. This latest blast email by the union only furthers that sentiment.
It's time to start dropping the brake late if we actually want a change; because per the union email: "unfortunately, the company has the final say." |
Originally Posted by fortyeight
(Post 2761834)
RPA has shown over and over and over that the only metric they truly care about is cost savings. Nothing else. Not quality of life, not fatigue risk management, not scheduling efficiency (in the eyes of crew members), etc. This latest blast email by the union only furthers that sentiment.
It's time to start dropping the brake late if we actually want a change; because per the union email: "unfortunately, the company has the final say." I would be careful about advocating a “work action” though, because this is a very open forum. |
Originally Posted by Viking6
(Post 2761845)
Unfortunately our current CBA doesn’t prevent what they’re doing. Yes they care about the cost above all else, and have from the very beginning. Also YX has never been commuter friendly.
I would be careful about advocating a “work action” though, because this is a very open forum. |
“In order to utilize more crew members...”
That, to me, sounds like they went a little overboard on the hiring and now they’re tired of paying guys to do nothing. The target line average is also low for next month. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2761907)
“In order to utilize more crew members...”
That, to me, sounds like they went a little overboard on the hiring and now they’re tired of paying guys to do nothing. The target line average is also low for next month. I think we will win this eventually, because they can’t afford to have a bunch of angry employees. This really screws the FAs though, because they have no rigs. |
Originally Posted by fortyeight
(Post 2761834)
RPA has shown over and over and over that the only metric they truly care about is cost savings. Nothing else. Not quality of life, not fatigue risk management, not scheduling efficiency (in the eyes of crew members), etc. This latest blast email by the union only furthers that sentiment.
It's time to start dropping the brake late if we actually want a change; because per the union email: "unfortunately, the company has the final say." |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2761907)
“In order to utilize more crew members...”
That, to me, sounds like they went a little overboard on the hiring and now they’re tired of paying guys to do nothing. The target line average is also low for next month. I agree. This is likely to be a record low month for me as far as flight time and used reserve days. They don’t like how we’re getting paid 75 hours to block 20 hours or less. |
Originally Posted by greendotplus10
(Post 2762025)
I agree. This is likely to be a record low month for me as far as flight time and used reserve days. They don’t like how we’re getting paid 75 hours to block 20 hours or less.
|
Originally Posted by Viking6
(Post 2762133)
The pilot info page on flica has the target line value. Basically it’s set for pilots to DEC/JAN values. It could be good if your close to holding a line, because maybe you get a low time line. Be sure and tatie advantage of your company rental car. Unlimited miles and gas is nice. Maybe go to the beach during your 32 hour GSP overnight.
|
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2762163)
These lengths of overnights aren't good for anyone. Yeah, 32 hour overnights at Delta are awesome when you're making $150,000+ and getting 20 days off per month. At a regional, not so much.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands