![]() |
Republic expects losses in
|
Seriously? Is it that difficult to look at the thread titles to see if anyone else beat you to it?
|
I beg your pardon, sir. Previous threads did NOT post this link highlighting the economic impact on RAH due to staffing...only BB remarks to the pilot group with respect to AC orders and ops. Relax, dude.
|
Awesome! I want to see all the low paying regionals suffer. Then maybe someday we'd get paid something.
|
Originally Posted by 121isnofun
(Post 1579183)
I beg your pardon, sir. Previous threads did NOT post this link highlighting the economic impact on RAH due to staffing...only BB remarks to the pilot group with respect to AC orders and ops. Relax, dude.
I'm plenty relaxed drinking a beer and watching the olympics. It's annoying when people like you don't think before they do things, like creating a new thread and cluttering the forums for no reason. By your logic, there should be a new thread every time there's another article that mentions a different angle on the same topic. Try thinking before you post. Mods please delete this thread |
Spaaks go drink a beer and chill the hell out
|
Originally Posted by flylikesly
(Post 1579271)
Spaaks go drink a beer and chill the hell out
|
Originally Posted by spaaks
(Post 1579236)
what are you talking about? The "BB admits pilot shortage...." thread is the 7 page long thread created for this announcement. Why would you not post the link in that thread like everyone else has done, if you want to discuss something specific about the announcement? Not to mention you only posted the link and didn't say anything else, and named the thread "republic expects losses in", which is idiotic. That's half a sentence. If the economic impact (750 jobs mentioned) is the reason you started the thread, why didn't you say that in the title or your post?
I'm plenty relaxed drinking a beer and watching the olympics. It's annoying when people like you don't think before they do things, like creating a new thread and cluttering the forums for no reason. By your logic, there should be a new thread every time there's another article that mentions a different angle on the same topic. Try thinking before you post. Mods please delete this thread |
Originally Posted by 121isnofun
(Post 1579112)
|
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands