Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Learjet crash in Teterboro >

Learjet crash in Teterboro

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Learjet crash in Teterboro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2018, 07:28 AM
  #41  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Where did you see this?
Page 84
https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/60000-60499/60373/611461.pdf
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 02-16-2018, 11:24 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Thanks.

When asked about the Trans-Pacific SIC-0 policy listed in their GM, he said he was not familiar with it. He had heard about the policy about an hour ago.
There is that pesky SIC-0 again.

‘...let me show you how this is done’?
Don’t like hearing that, but I don’t remember reading that in the CVR transcript either.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 02-16-2018, 12:13 PM
  #43  
Number Last
 
PowderFinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Thanks.


There is that pesky SIC-0 again.

‘...let me show you how this is done’?
Don’t like hearing that, but I don’t remember reading that in the CVR transcript either.
I don't remember reading that either ... Thought that was the highly popular and skilled avatrix at SW going into LGA
PowderFinger is offline  
Old 02-16-2018, 12:17 PM
  #44  
Number Last
 
PowderFinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Default

Would love to hear why the captain only lasted 2 months at PSA
PowderFinger is offline  
Old 02-19-2018, 10:02 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by PowderFinger View Post
Would love to hear why the captain only lasted 2 months at PSA
Couldnt one FOIA the PRIA records?

Also regarding the accident, the SIC-0 program was the PREVENT this from happening.

When asked why there was a need for SIC-0 system if the SIC was already fully qualified, he
said that SICs had demonstrated their abilities in a simulator, but not in real life with passengers.
Before putting their name on the line with passengers who were paying the bills, they wanted to
make sure they can handle the basic tasks

At the time of the accident, there were no Lear SICs that were allowed to fly the airplane
since they were all SIC-0.
TCASTESTOK is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 01:35 AM
  #46  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Captain - convicted of assault with a deadly weapon and multiple check ride busts and issues.
FO - convicted of 3rd degree assault on a police officer and multiple check ride busts.

Sometime a history of judgment lapses and poor flying ability are just what they appear to be. Results kind of speak for themselves.
Reading through some of interviews and statements, I can say with some measure of conviction that the statements are at best questionable, as are certain of those interviewed, as I know some of those involved, as well as the aircraft and the operators. I'd hesitate to be specific on a public forum, but the only surprise is that this didn't happen sooner. Additionally, certain of the operators tended to hire questionably, and to gather eclectic characters.

The culture of minimal training and captain dominance in the cockpit was corporate from the top down when many of these actors worked together. It's an attitude and approach to flying that the industry has been trying to stamp out for the past couple of decades, yet in pockets, it remains. The use of first officers not capable of flying the airplane is a window into that mentality.

One of those named had a long history of pushing fuel to nearly zero, and took great pride in landing at or nearly out of fuel, and had flamed engines out that way, and flown high speed direct to final with a steep descent due to being fuel critical, on a regular basis. The same also had major anger management issues, including mandatory anger management counseling; that such a person was called on to make character judgements of the deceased throws much of the process into question. Suffice it to say that there is a lot more unsaid than said here, and the small bit shown is only the topside portion of the ice berg.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 07:29 PM
  #47  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Thanks for the additional info JB.
I could read CYA between the lines as well.

The culture of minimal training and captain dominance in the cockpit was corporate from the top down when many of these actors worked together. It's an attitude and approach to flying that the industry has been trying to stamp out for the past couple of decades, yet in pockets, it remains. The use of first officers not capable of flying the airplane is a window into that mentality
This ^^^
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 08:09 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: SW4
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Thanks for the additional info JB.

I could read CYA between the lines as well.







This ^^^


I flew with the SIC early on (I did his INST .. nearly only rating he didn’t bust). Great kid. Nice guy. But LITS of alarm bells early on. So sad for him and his family ... but this was a perfect storm of two pilots that should have never been together.. ever!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pilotguy7 is offline  
Old 02-22-2018, 03:57 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
The company is going to take a HUGE hit on this as the SIC wasn't even suppose to be flying the airplane
Yea good luck to them ever being insured again. It is a fact that their insurance will NOT payout for this due to the SIC flying when he wasn't supposed to be.
TCASTESTOK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
fatmike69
Corporate
31
09-16-2009 09:30 AM
robbreid
Corporate
9
11-15-2008 07:54 AM
GravellyPointer
Major
17
04-08-2007 07:05 AM
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
14
06-07-2006 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices