Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
SFO Near Miss 28R >

SFO Near Miss 28R

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

SFO Near Miss 28R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 12:45 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default SFO Near Miss 28R

Exclusive: Air Canada near-miss at SFO sparks FAA probe

Mink is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 03:12 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

This seems to happen more often than we would think. It could happen to any of us: add fatigue, lack of proficiency, maybe newly typed in the plane, etc. Just goes to show, never let your guard down. Even if flying a visual, always have a white/magenta/green (whatever you guys use) line to final. If there is an ILS, no reason not to use it as a backup. A localizer tuned up would have shown significant CDI deflection even a mile or two out from threshold as the pilot was lined up on the taxiway. I always brief the runway lighting if it is night or IMC so we both know what we are supposed to see when we break out of the goo.
C130driver is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 03:41 PM
  #3  
FO
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: B777
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
This seems to happen more often than we would think. It could happen to any of us: add fatigue, lack of proficiency, maybe newly typed in the plane, etc. Just goes to show, never let your guard down. Even if flying a visual, always have a white/magenta/green (whatever you guys use) line to final. If there is an ILS, no reason not to use it as a backup. A localizer tuned up would have shown significant CDI deflection even a mile or two out from threshold as the pilot was lined up on the taxiway. I always brief the runway lighting if it is night or IMC so we both know what we are supposed to see when we break out of the goo.
Great advice! With the frequency of serious errors that have already occurred, (wrong airports, etc), in just the last several years, I'm surprised that backup navigation has not already been "standardized" industrywide to mitigate these serious errors that just keep recurring. Does it require a catastrophe to effect industry change?
Hawkerdriver1 is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 04:53 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

The way that approach works and how the Airbus operates, you generally don't have back up nav.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 05:22 PM
  #5  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
This seems to happen more often than we would think. It could happen to any of us: add fatigue, lack of proficiency, maybe newly typed in the plane, etc. Just goes to show, never let your guard down. Even if flying a visual, always have a white/magenta/green (whatever you guys use) line to final. If there is an ILS, no reason not to use it as a backup. A localizer tuned up would have shown significant CDI deflection even a mile or two out from threshold as the pilot was lined up on the taxiway. I always brief the runway lighting if it is night or IMC so we both know what we are supposed to see when we break out of the goo.
All of that is great.

But I would add, if things look weird or the hairs on the back of your neck start to tingle, it is time to take a step back.

Listening to the radio calls, the Air Canada queries the tower about "lights on the runway" and asking to confirm landing clearance. It seems something isn't adding up to him.

At that point, it really doesn't matter who has erred. Maybe ground is crossing someone without regard to landing traffic, or a ground vehicle is lost, or we are lined up with the taxiway, it doesn't really matter because they all end in a bad way.

The point is when one gets that "this just don't feel right!" feeling, get to a safe place (in this case, go around) and do a reset. Don't continue when your gut says 'no'.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 06:19 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by IDIOTPILOT View Post
The way that approach works and how the Airbus operates, you generally don't have back up nav.
You can't have the ILS in for the runway you are landing on?
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 06:33 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
You can't have the ILS in for the runway you are landing on?
They were probably on the FMS Bridge Visual. You can't have the ILS and the RNAV data displayed on the PFD at the same time. There's no raw data RNAV lateral needle on the 320.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 07:01 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default

Originally Posted by IDIOTPILOT View Post
They were probably on the FMS Bridge Visual. You can't have the ILS and the RNAV data displayed on the PFD at the same time. There's no raw data RNAV lateral needle on the 320.
So at the bridge, once the "Bridge Visual" part is done, have the PNF get out of RNAV and tune up / display the 28R localizer....?
Mink is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 05:29 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Default

Originally Posted by IDIOTPILOT View Post
They were probably on the FMS Bridge Visual. You can't have the ILS and the RNAV data displayed on the PFD at the same time. There's no raw data RNAV lateral needle on the 320.
So the Airbus can't transition from an RNAV arrival/visual to an ILS?
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 02:45 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by Mink View Post
So at the bridge, once the "Bridge Visual" part is done, have the PNF get out of RNAV and tune up / display the 28R localizer....?
Originally Posted by threeighteen
So the Airbus can't transition from an RNAV arrival/visual to an ILS?
I guess you could kinda do it this way but it wouldn't be SOP I think anywhere. I'm not sure what the FD would do if you only switched one side that low on the approach. You could put the raw data ILS into the MFD but you'd lose a lot of situational awareness. I think you're better off zooming in the MFD all the way and making sure it's over the line, especially with someone on the parallel.

I'm sure someone who's flown an Airbus more or tried something like this in the past could shed more light.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dave Fitzgerald
United
8
01-23-2014 09:59 PM
Dave Fitzgerald
United
6
07-06-2013 02:34 PM
ryane946
Regional
5
04-08-2007 02:33 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
28
10-25-2006 08:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices