Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Just Culture Accident Model >

Just Culture Accident Model

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Just Culture Accident Model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2017, 06:07 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
ptarmigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
Prior to stall entry the correct answer would be “it depends”. Early on, probably not, as it got closer, likely yes.

On the second question, on a constant rate descent you’re at 1-g so that is fine, it is responding to the change, g-dot, not steady state case.
More directly, once the initial correction to the indicated altitude error was made it would have taken direct input to prevent it.
ptarmigan is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 06:32 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
More directly, once the initial correction to the indicated altitude error was made it would have taken direct input to prevent it.
Yeah well, hard lessons, this line of work has them in spades. Don't really know where Just Culture begins and ends. But there are some things I know a pair of wings won't do for you. Sustaining lift at that deck angle, weight and altitude being one of them. Pure conjecture on my part, this is a pilot and crew that refused to accept they had to come down, no longer within the boundaries of controlled flight. The aforementioned complications of restricted manual flying and only then, exclusively through augmented joy stick pointers coupled to thrust levers that don't move, probably didn't help.

Ever observe guys using procedures trainers or FTD's that aren't intended for maneuvers yet they persist & somehow manage do a pretty fair job of flying the thing? Pilots don't fly like FMS algorithms, they use control authority as presented or remaining available and put the airplane where it must be given present circumstances. In other words, get it right, whatever it takes.

Ernie Gann and the Duke. Never thought I'd see the day their influence departed Just Culture.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 07:44 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
ptarmigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 566
Default

The use of Just Culture as proposed is just a tool to try to dig deeper than "they screwed up" at the early stages of a major investigation.

The problem with the AF447 scenario (which got conflated into this thread) is that it is a lot harder to understand what is happening when you're in the situation than it is when you are reading about the event timeline while knowing the outcome.
ptarmigan is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 08:59 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
The problem with the AF447 scenario (which got conflated into this thread) is that it is a lot harder to understand what is happening when you're in the situation than it is when you are reading about the event timeline while knowing the outcome.

I believe that for sure. So how's what occurred important to me? Know your target pitch & power settings verbatim. IVSI pegged down, altimeter winding down, buried in a warning avalanche, "WHO HAS CONTROL?"

Very much appreciate the valuable time given explaining the framework of opinions shared. I read posts to learn, pushing into the corners sometimes to find out if there's more. Happy landings, gentlemen.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 11:40 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
ptarmigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
I believe that for sure. So how's what occurred important to me? Know your target pitch & power settings verbatim. IVSI pegged down, altimeter winding down, buried in a warning avalanche, "WHO HAS CONTROL?"

Very much appreciate the valuable time given explaining the framework of opinions shared. I read posts to learn, pushing into the corners sometimes to find out if there's more. Happy landings, gentlemen.
Yes, but add learn what stalls really look like, learn aerodynamics, understand intimately your airplanes systems, including the Flight control system and control algorithms, learn meteorology and how to get the most out of the Weather avoidance equipment installed in your airplane.

Yes, your company SHOULD be training all of this. Don’t hold your breath, you may actually die waiting!
ptarmigan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeeMat
United
131
07-11-2014 06:44 PM
ksatflyer
Major
95
12-07-2009 10:03 AM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
cl65
Major
0
03-02-2006 08:31 PM
AlohaFlyer
Hiring News
7
09-02-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices