Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Laptop ban coming soon? >

Laptop ban coming soon?

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Laptop ban coming soon?

Old 10-20-2017, 08:28 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,574
Question Laptop ban coming soon?

Feds urge airlines to ban laptops in checked bags, citing fire, explosion risk - Chicago Tribune
SonicFlyer is online now  
Old 10-20-2017, 10:30 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Default

That's a proposal to ban laptops from CHECKED luggage.

Very few people check laptops. Laptops are expensive and airlines will not accept liability for loss or damage for laptops in checked luggage.

Such a ban would change very little as very few passengers would be effected.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:24 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

I believe a lot of them end up in the belly with gate checked bags.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:45 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
I believe a lot of them end up in the belly with gate checked bags.

Maybe a few. I always take mine out.

Probably a good idea to ban them, we can easily fight the fire in the cabin. Maybe not in the cargo bin.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:20 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Maybe a few. I always take mine out.

Probably a good idea to ban them, we can easily fight the fire in the cabin. Maybe not in the cargo bin.
"Easily"? My guess is you've never held a run away lithium battery. I had a phone battery run away once. It was amazing in its intensity. Not so easy.

Since lithiums, my personal policy with cargo smoke on to point the ship towards the nearest suitable while we run the checklist.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:43 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
"Easily"? My guess is you've never held a run away lithium battery. I had a phone battery run away once. It was amazing in its intensity. Not so easy.

Since lithiums, my personal policy with cargo smoke on to point the ship towards the nearest suitable while we run the checklist.
We have special equipment onboard to deal with Li batteries now (in the cabin). Easily as in in it can be contained, and you know the status. FA will have something to talk about at the bar later.

If it's in the cargo bin, you have no idea what's going on and how bad it is, whether you need to divert, ditch, or land on I-405.

But yes, immediate action for any on-board fire is going to be point to a suitable divert.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 09:39 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default

The nearest suitable could be hours away when crossing the pond.
Rama is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 10:20 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
We have special equipment onboard to deal with Li batteries now (in the cabin). Easily as in in it can be contained, and you know the status. FA will have something to talk about at the bar later.

If it's in the cargo bin, you have no idea what's going on and how bad it is, whether you need to divert, ditch, or land on I-405.

But yes, immediate action for any on-board fire is going to be point to a suitable divert.
I am familiar , no aware of the procedures. They look good on paper. I'm skeptical although in reality. Imagine, after the thing starts burning and igniting whatever it is touching as well, someone goes to search for the gloves and the bag. Once you get them on, you approach the device, putting out acrid toxic smoke. If you are able to grab it and get it in the bag without choking out or having your eyes burned, you've made a good start. Then you have to fight the cabin fire started by the device. Otherwise, oh yeah.. guess we're gonna need the hood before we can grab it. Those are difficult to actually manipulate anything with it on.

Still, it would be preferable than in the hold.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 02:25 PM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

We can't ban PEDs from pax flights, everybody would just stay home and we'd be unemployed. Seriously.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 02:53 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Very true. Like most other things, it's a calculated risk. Hopefully, the market and technology will develop batteries that the risk calculus becomes more favorable.
BMEP100 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Free Bird
Safety
34
01-20-2013 07:21 PM
simuflite
Major
25
12-17-2012 07:13 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
5
04-27-2012 04:26 AM
crash84
Cargo
0
08-26-2009 07:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices