Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-20-2018, 05:44 PM   #1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 129
Default Good day for GPWS

Incident: Skywest CRJ9 at Medford on Dec 24th 2017, GPWS alert on approach
ZeroTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 07:55 AM   #2
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flogger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: CRJ200
Posts: 243
Default

This goes back to the pre-TEM days of swiss cheese layers.

They punched thru 3 layers of cheese and they just missed the hole in the 4th layer. Good thing the GPWS was there as a 4th layer.

The 5th unintended cheese layer of 7800 feet may have saved them by a few hundred feet, but maybe not at at 6 degrees celsius?

Big fat Awe-Crap on ATC for a LET THE LAWYERS SORT IT OUT clearance. I'm not a controller, so I will defer judgement.

Aw-crap on the crew for taking the ambiguous ATC clearance bait.

Big fat Atta-boy to the crew for following the GPWS. Many FOQUA events reflect crews disregarding GPWS or being dangerously slow to react.
Flogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 08:12 AM   #3
Tornado Bait
 
Mercyful Fate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Guppy
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flogger View Post
This goes back to the pre-TEM days of swiss cheese layers.

They punched thru 3 layers of cheese and they just missed the hole in the 4th layer. Good thing the GPWS was there as a 4th layer.

The 5th unintended cheese layer of 7800 feet may have saved them by a few hundred feet, but maybe not at at 6 degrees celsius?

Big fat Awe-Crap on ATC for a LET THE LAWYERS SORT IT OUT clearance. I'm not a controller, so I will defer judgement.

Aw-crap on the crew for taking the ambiguous ATC clearance bait.

Big fat Atta-boy to the crew for following the GPWS. Many FOQUA events reflect crews disregarding GPWS or being dangerously slow to react.

Is the GPWS something that is always required to be operational for a 121 operated flight?
Mercyful Fate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 08:24 AM   #4
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 19,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Is the GPWS something that is always required to be operational for a 121 operated flight?
No, but IIRC it's a 1 or 3 day MEL.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 08:32 AM   #5
Tornado Bait
 
Mercyful Fate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Guppy
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No, but IIRC it's a 1 or 3 day MEL.
Wow, so if in this situation the GPWS was on a MEL status, this could have become very ugly?
Mercyful Fate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 08:35 AM   #6
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 271
Default

Not that I have a dog in this particular fight, but I am seeing a trend with ATC here. I have been getting cleared for approaches into nontowered airports where they “allow” me to descend below a published segment. I say allow because those clearances are extremely misleading. A simple, cleared at or above “fix minimums” cleared “approach “ would suffice. Not clear us for anything lower than the segment altitude.

Just my .02
NeverHome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2018, 08:45 AM   #7
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 19,540
Default

In US domestic ops, RJ drivers get used to quickly dancing to arbitrary and constantly changing ATC instructions in large terminal areas. If you fail to respond instantly, you'll likely create a conflict.

This leads to the mindset of comply now, think about it later. In this case the crew should have at least double checked what they were doing after they initiated the descent.

But these guys have been trained by the system to react quickly... foreign aircraft are handled with kid gloves, and the locals are assumed to be familiar with the area, experienced, with a good command of english so they get used and abused when ATC needs buffers and adjustments.

They are also very accustomed to getting vectored in below published altitudes... even on complex non-precision approaches in the mountains. Most of them are probably not aware that a "cross at or above" clearance could legally be issued with an altitude below safe altitudes on the approach. Most would tell you (based on common practice) that you can immediately descend to the at or above altitude.

What the controller did may or may not have been legal, but it sure wasn't consistent with what his buddies do in practice
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2018, 09:51 AM   #8
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 673
Default SKW CRJ has near CFIT:

Incident: Skywest CRJ9 at Medford on Dec 24th 2017, GPWS alert on approach
SonicFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2018, 09:53 AM   #9
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 118
Default

https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/110739-good-day-gpws.html

/close
peepz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2018, 06:28 PM   #10
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Default GPWS saves the day

A Skywest CRJ9 was cleared to "at or above 7800'" on an approach that specified an altitude of 10000'. Down they went to 7800, but the GPWS prevented collision with the mountains.

Any thoughts on the appropriateness of the ATC clearance?

Details:

http://www.avherald.com/h?article=4b3d8f81&opt=0
aaatwood is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kalitta T/A - Tasty Tidbits Stimpy the Kat Cargo 77 12-03-2016 08:24 AM
Detailed Recap Anaylsis of UAL's Investor Day Boeing Aviator United 9 11-25-2016 12:58 PM
Trans States CaptainCarl Trans States Airlines 10900 12-31-2015 11:54 AM
Post your schedule... 3stripes Regional 31 02-22-2014 08:01 PM
Bad Day - Worse Day (trip) trade at ASA? meloveboeing Regional 5 10-02-2010 07:47 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 PM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.3, Copyright ©2000-2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2017 Internet Brands, Inc.