Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
ERAU Arrow crash preliminary report >

ERAU Arrow crash preliminary report

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

ERAU Arrow crash preliminary report

Old 04-17-2018, 08:53 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,574
Unhappy ERAU Arrow crash preliminary report

As rumored, wing came off in flight, looks like metal fatigue:


https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/Re...=HTML&IType=FA
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 09:35 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

This airplane probably led a life of high-cycles, with plenty of low-altitude maneuver and cruise in air that tends to be bumpy and salty. This could be the canary for PA-28's of that generation. Wouldn't surprise me to see bulletins or AD's to follow.

Fair winds and following seas.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 10:24 AM
  #3  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,406
Default

What a horrible, horrible way to go

I wonder if this could have been detected by completing SB1006.
dera is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 10:33 AM
  #4  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,309
Default

Absolutely horrible. So sad.
PotatoChip is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 11:37 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 548
Default

You rarely see pictures in Prelim reports. My guess is the NTSB is going after an Emergency AD.

"None of the surfaces exhibited visible evidence of corrosion or other preexisting damage. The right wing also exhibited fatigue cracks in the lower spar cap at the same hole location extending up to 0.047-inch deep."

SB1006 is for corrosion behind the fuel tank mid spar.

Last edited by Whale Driver; 04-17-2018 at 11:59 AM.
Whale Driver is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 12:00 PM
  #6  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,406
Default

Originally Posted by Whale Driver View Post
You rarely see pictures in Prelim reports. My guess is the NTSB is going after an Emergency AD.

"None of the surfaces exhibited visible evidence of corrosion or other preexisting damage. The right wing also exhibited fatigue cracks in the lower spar cap at the same hole location extending up to 0.047-inch deep."
That's scary. And yeah, not surprised if there's an (expensive) Emergency AD soon.
dera is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 12:02 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,241
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
This could be the canary for PA-28's of that generation.
The plane was made in 2007, so it really isn't that old for a trainer. I hope this aircraft had a unique history to explain the fatigue.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 12:28 PM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
The plane was made in 2007, so it really isn't that old for a trainer. I hope this aircraft had a unique history to explain the fatigue.
I know. I think the unusual history was the location and use of the aircraft. If a failure was going to occur, that's exactly the kind of operational history where it would happen first. Since the other wing exhibited fatigue as well, it wasn't a defect in just the one spar. May affect other aircraft in that general production run.

I'm *assuming* not a design flaw, since piston ASEL wing spars are pretty well-defined technology. Perhaps a material defect from the mfg... that might affect other hulls. Worst case they tried to use high-tech design tools to remove weight during a design update, and went too far.

Since both wings were affected, and the plane was so new, I suspect we're going to hear more on this one. If my kid went to school there, he'd be grounded until they checked the other planes, or determined that that the accident plane was over-stressed.

It's *possible* somebody over-stressed the plane at some point in the past and didn't report it, but frankly it would be hard to crack wing spars without bending anything first... I would think an event like that that would have left visible bent sheet metal and popped rivets. I've seen over-stressed planes that made it home and they were obviously jacked up.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 12:32 PM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by Whale Driver View Post
You rarely see pictures in Prelim reports. My guess is the NTSB is going after an Emergency AD.

"None of the surfaces exhibited visible evidence of corrosion or other preexisting damage. The right wing also exhibited fatigue cracks in the lower spar cap at the same hole location extending up to 0.047-inch deep."

SB1006 is for corrosion behind the fuel tank mid spar.
x2
.........
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 05:14 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

I’ll be the jerk to say it.
I hope this accident weighs heavily on every ERAU student and CFI who ever did unauthorized aerobatics in one of these airplanes.
Blackhawk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wannabepilot
Major
32
09-22-2007 01:53 PM
ERJ135
Regional
36
03-08-2007 07:35 PM
ToiletDuck
Corporate
0
01-25-2007 05:41 PM
FlyerJosh
Part 135
0
11-23-2006 05:06 AM
RockBottom
Major
3
06-07-2005 07:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices