Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
FNC: Is FAA sacrificing safety for diversity? >

FNC: Is FAA sacrificing safety for diversity?

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

FNC: Is FAA sacrificing safety for diversity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2018, 03:58 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

BBC World News
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 04:56 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
BBC World News
Nope - try again. That’s just a more polite version of CNN with an accent.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 05:26 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WhistlePig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
This is making the rounds on Fox News...




Tucker Carlson: "Is the FAA sacrificing your safety for diversity?"
The questionairre is only used to help identify candidates that have been overlooked in the legacy search process, it doesn't take the place of an interview or qualifications. Tucker knows this, he also knows how to stoke the fears of his audience for ratings.
WhistlePig is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 05:29 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
BBC World News
As regular BBC viewers are aware, it carries a left centric, socialist bias. It also covers the Mideast & Africa regions far more consistently & intensively than rivals here. Like the others, they rely heavily on opinion based commentary over expensive, boots on the ground, investigative journalism. Mainstream news revenue account execs steering content in a competition for ratings share. Many those still watching traditional news programs increasingly choosing what they want to hear over anything else.

Strip this news item from your prejudice about its source, the story in question has merit.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 06:08 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

MSNBC lost me with Pruitt's moisturizer lotion, surely there must be more relevant news.l
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 06:30 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
MSNBC lost me with Pruitt's moisturizer lotion, surely there must be more relevant news.l
He shoulda’ used alligator grease, like the Karankawas did here in the swamp. It repels mosquitos, and reporters too.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-10-2018, 07:49 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Default

Every news agency out there has bias. We already know there will be bias involved regardless of the agency that reported the story. The question to be asked is whether the story has basis in fact. That's the more relevant discussion.
Flightcap is offline  
Old 06-10-2018, 08:37 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 88
Default

I have a twitter account mostly to keep up with politics and world news. Half of my sources are left leaning and the other half are right leaning. This is the best method that I’ve found to remain in the loop without being unconsciously swayed.

Anyone who religiously follows a specific source of news without giving serious thought and consideration to the other side is doing themselves a disservice. I can pick a religious follower of either FOX or CNN off the street and before they utter their first world I’ll know every point of their argument and I can almost bet that not a single original thought will come out of their mouth. They are not keeping up with the news, they are keeping up with a specific viewpoint. It is in fact a sad state of affairs when our news outlets are so polarized, but I guess it is what it is. I blame a lack of education, most people are so uneducated, it’s amazing. They do very little reading, therefore those whom are very well read have an easy time swaying them left or right while they sit patiently like a blade of grass waiting for the wind to blow on them.
aiir is offline  
Old 06-11-2018, 05:42 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by aiir View Post
They are not keeping up with the news, they are keeping up with a specific viewpoint. It is in fact a sad state of affairs when our news outlets are so polarized, but I guess it is what it is. I blame a lack of education, most people are so uneducated, it’s amazing. They do very little reading, therefore those whom are very well read have an easy time swaying them left or right while they sit patiently like a blade of grass waiting for the wind to blow on them.
Troublesome hurdle. How do you report when your dispatch is primarily a PR entertainment piece?

By comparison, something discussed at length in print, the role of the press during the last period of transformational social adjustment (late 60's) makes today's media effort look pretty listless. Bias is present always. But the fight then, IMHO, had less to do with pretentiousness over dogma & ideology than commitment to uncovering the truth, wherever a story went.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 06-11-2018, 01:10 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Default

Very few people like being bewildered, most find it frightening. That is what it takes to learn anything new once you become an adult.
kevbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Varsity
Major
272
10-06-2018 08:58 AM
trigg41
Cargo
160
08-04-2014 12:36 AM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
0
03-08-2006 06:56 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices