Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
AA flight caught in hail storm (Pictures) >

AA flight caught in hail storm (Pictures)

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

AA flight caught in hail storm (Pictures)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2018, 01:52 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

On another forum, a poster said an autoland was not possible due to damage to the aircraft (pitot systems, etc.), and that they had Airspeed Unreliable also...
atpcliff is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:55 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,230
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
On another forum, a poster said an autoland was not possible due to damage to the aircraft (pitot systems, etc.), and that they had Airspeed Unreliable also...
Not sure about the Bus but some A/C have the glideslope antennae in the nose.
trip is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 07:00 PM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
On another forum, a poster said an autoland was not possible due to damage to the aircraft (pitot systems, etc.), and that they had Airspeed Unreliable also...
I suspected they might be missing some CAT-III equipment.

Unreliable airspeed. Oh Joy. Even better with opaque windshields.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 09:07 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

The radar and the ancient CRT’s in the former LUS 319’s are horrible. Worst I’ve ever used in any transport category aircraft, to include the turboprops. Most of us are not surprised at all that this eventually happened in one of those airplanes.

They are nearly useless. Not kidding.

I believe the union may be trying to convince the company to finally do something about those radars.

The Multiscan radars in the Advanced models are excellent, by the way.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 05:48 PM
  #25  
Screen Toucher
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: F/O
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice View Post
The radar and the ancient CRT’s in the former LUS 319’s are horrible. Worst I’ve ever used in any transport category aircraft, to include the turboprops. Most of us are not surprised at all that this eventually happened in one of those airplanes.

They are nearly useless. Not kidding.

I believe the union may be trying to convince the company to finally do something about those radars.

The Multiscan radars in the Advanced models are excellent, by the way.
The -AW stands for "All Work".
SunDevilPilot is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 07:22 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Default

I *think* an ILS is an ILS is an ILS. The difference is in lighting, markings and critical area protection, no?
swaayze is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 09:38 AM
  #27  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by swaayze View Post
I *think* an ILS is an ILS is an ILS. The difference is in lighting, markings and critical area protection, no?
Yes in the sense that auto-land will work even if the ILS is not approved for CAT-II/III. The radio signals are same. A CAT-II/III ILS is going to have certain additional requirements, what you mentioned, plus likely tighter or more frequent flight check standards (USMCFlyer would know).

A CAT-I only ILS might produce a squirrely (or aborted) auto-land in the flare regime.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 03:01 PM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Cookie Puss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 19
Default

A poor decision to partake in a Q and A session with passengers afterwards. I would never allow myself or my fellow crewmenbers to do such a thing.
Cookie Puss is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 05:42 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

I saw/heard a 2:30 clip of that and didn’t think they said anything even remotely damning of them or the operation. They answered very basic questions that seemed to soothe the frazzled, confused crowd.

Personally, I’m much more of a private person anyway, so I wouldn’t have done that myself.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 07:15 PM
  #30  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice View Post
I saw/heard a 2:30 clip of that and didn’t think they said anything even remotely damning of them or the operation. They answered very basic questions that seemed to soothe the frazzled, confused crowd.

Personally, I’m much more of a private person anyway, so I wouldn’t have done that myself.
Tough call. I would be inclined to communicate, but these days you know it will be edited for sensationalism, taken out of context, then plastered all over the six o'clock news. You'd better have a way with words.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCFLYR
Military
85
08-14-2021 03:19 PM
j3cub
Allegiant
6367
12-20-2020 08:01 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
02-05-2013 08:00 AM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices