Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
SWA 737 Burbank incident >

SWA 737 Burbank incident

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

SWA 737 Burbank incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2018, 09:49 AM
  #301  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,641
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
All the data's freely available to calculate landing distance. Or do you think that landing data involves some sort of alchemy?
The only way that crew could 'legally' shoehorn that plane onto the runway under those conditions was to use FICON 5. In RA+.
What was landing weight?

What was reported FICON?

Did they use 30 or 40 flaps?

(Did they have good numbers for 40 and accidentally set 30?)

Why don’t you tell us what the landing distance numbers were?
at6d is offline  
Old 12-14-2018, 09:56 AM
  #302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
All the data's freely available to calculate landing distance. Or do you think that landing data involves some sort of alchemy?
The only way that crew could 'legally' shoehorn that plane onto the runway under those conditions was to use FICON 5. In RA+.
Hmm. You have all the data from the BUR flight? Were you the pilot, the NTSB lead investigator, a fly on the wall? I know... you slept in a Holiday Inn Express last night.

The weather report might be published, but if you think you have ALL the info pertaining to this, then you haven’t been around very long.
Skyward is offline  
Old 12-14-2018, 10:46 AM
  #303  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
Default

Anybody passing judgment on this is part of the problem. We are all capable of pushing too hard or making mistakes. If you don't understand that I don't want you in my cockpit. What's wrong with you that you take such pleasure in other flight crews mishaps? This brings us all down. Wait for the report. Learn from it. And remember that there are those that have and those that will.
Swingline78 is offline  
Old 12-14-2018, 12:28 PM
  #304  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Andy..

See posts 299, 300, 301.

Yes, you and others like you ARE the problem!!!
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 12-15-2018, 02:35 PM
  #305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,158
Default

No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.

I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
Andy is online now  
Old 12-15-2018, 03:03 PM
  #306  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.

I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
Pack up your suit case and go back to your bridge, troll. You are calling yourself out to every professional who reads this forum as someone no one wants to fly with.
Swingline78 is offline  
Old 12-15-2018, 03:18 PM
  #307  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by Swingline78 View Post
Pack up your suit case and go back to your bridge, troll. You are calling yourself out to every professional who reads this forum as someone no one wants to fly with.
Andy is a UAL guy. Probably the best hand flying pilots in the world. Just ask him and his CEO.

Just like your CEO and MEC chairman comments on the Lion Air accident. I assume you were all on board that flight too and have “ALL” the data.

Again...GMAFB!!
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 12-15-2018, 03:22 PM
  #308  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,611
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.

I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
For someone who supposedly wants to learn from the mistakes of others, you sure are quick to throw the crew under the bus without knowing all the facts, factors, workload, calculations, etc.

I refuse to believe that any airline pilot in this country would knowingly violate procedures and policies and recklessly push into a questionable destination, ergo... a mistake was made somewhere. The question is where?

Did the crew make a mistake of running dry vs. wet numbers? When were the numbers run? Did the wind shift since the initial calculation was performed? Was the crew distracted? Did they float? How did they end up off to the side of the runway as opposed to going straight out into the blast pad? So many unanswered questions, yet that doesn't seem to stop the comments like "cowboy ops!!!" especially from someone who claims they want to learn.

Disappointing...
RJSAviator76 is online now  
Old 12-15-2018, 03:26 PM
  #309  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Not disappointing RJ....Just ignorance and arrogance!
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 12-15-2018, 03:43 PM
  #310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Awa(k3rE3
Posts: 213
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
I refuse to believe that any airline pilot in this country would knowingly violate procedures and policies and recklessly push into a questionable destination
This is a pretty naive statement. Not saying this SWA crew falls into this bucket because I, like many others, will wait until all the facts are presented before making my own personal, private judgments. But to say there are not reckless pilots in this industry? They're out there. Certainly a small minority but present nonetheless.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
okawner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
candlerman
Southwest
12
02-23-2012 05:35 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
120
11-28-2011 10:26 AM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
0
07-09-2011 06:35 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices