SWA 737 Burbank incident
#301
What was reported FICON?
Did they use 30 or 40 flaps?
(Did they have good numbers for 40 and accidentally set 30?)
Why don’t you tell us what the landing distance numbers were?
#302
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 588
The weather report might be published, but if you think you have ALL the info pertaining to this, then you haven’t been around very long.
#303
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
Anybody passing judgment on this is part of the problem. We are all capable of pushing too hard or making mistakes. If you don't understand that I don't want you in my cockpit. What's wrong with you that you take such pleasure in other flight crews mishaps? This brings us all down. Wait for the report. Learn from it. And remember that there are those that have and those that will.
#305
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,158
No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
#306
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
#307
Banned
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Just like your CEO and MEC chairman comments on the Lion Air accident. I assume you were all on board that flight too and have “ALL” the data.
Again...GMAFB!!
#308
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,611
No Whale, the problem is that you and others here are keeping the cowboy ops reputation alive and well by circling the wagons on this one. As for the data, one doesn't need to even run numbers on this to know that it was dicey at best.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
I cannot believe that anyone would even attempt to defend such poor judgment.
I refuse to believe that any airline pilot in this country would knowingly violate procedures and policies and recklessly push into a questionable destination, ergo... a mistake was made somewhere. The question is where?
Did the crew make a mistake of running dry vs. wet numbers? When were the numbers run? Did the wind shift since the initial calculation was performed? Was the crew distracted? Did they float? How did they end up off to the side of the runway as opposed to going straight out into the blast pad? So many unanswered questions, yet that doesn't seem to stop the comments like "cowboy ops!!!" especially from someone who claims they want to learn.
Disappointing...
#310
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Awa(k3rE3
Posts: 213
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post