Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:20 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Given an equal choice - 737 Max vs 737 - 800 which door would you walk through? We are not talking Max vs Motorcycle here.
I like flying the Max. Just flew it yesterday.
ORDinary is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 01:21 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx View Post
Well, the 737-800 fatality rate is not looking too good right now.
Source? Post some real numbers if you are going make claims like that.
ORDinary is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 01:34 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by ORDinary View Post
Source? Post some real numbers if you are going make claims like that.
Are 2 airframes lost out of 350 delivered real enough for you? That is a .6% loss rate right there.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 01:39 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,590
Post China grounds 737-MAX

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/19/0...ft-after-crash
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 02:05 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx View Post
Are 2 airframes lost out of 350 delivered real enough for you? That is a .6% loss rate right there.
Perhaps you are referring to the 737 MAX-8, not the 737-800. Different planes.
astaz is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 02:36 PM
  #106  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx View Post
Are 2 airframes lost out of 350 delivered real enough for you? That is a .6% loss rate right there.
Originally Posted by astaz View Post
Perhaps you are referring to the 737 MAX-8, not the 737-800. Different planes.
350 total MAX deliveries. Some of those are other variants, but the MAX 8 looks to account for the largest number in service.

Very rough SWAG: 300 MAX 8 delivered, most but not all in service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...and_deliveries
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 02:59 PM
  #107  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock View Post
With bad AOA indications, could it be triggering a stall warning (and MCAS) while showing accurate airspeed, which leads the crew to believe the airspeed was unreliable?
I’m just a regional dude so I’m not at all familiar with the 737 at all. Does the MAX employ traditional AOA vanes or smart probes for AOA information? From what I’ve been able to ascertain from my google-fu, only one faulty AOA sensor is enough to trigger the system which is basically similar to a stick pusher that can not be manually overridden. It does seem risky to have a single point failure that can lead to severe pitch controllability issues.
Rahlifer is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 03:04 PM
  #108  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: 767 Capt
Posts: 22
Default

Looks like Boeing is playing Tic Tac Toe. How many 737 crashes does it take before they have enough Xs on the world map to fix this flaw?

If these crashes are because of a faulty AOA sensor and an automatic flight control input of countering a perceived stall, it is an unsafe and poorly designed system. Just imagine you rotate on takeoff and suddenly the airplane pitches down because of a faulty AOA sensor. If Lockheed had this on C141s I would have splashed in the Indian Ocean when I had a faulty AOA on rotation.

This is very bad for Boeing.
Boatfly is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 03:06 PM
  #109  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer View Post
I’m just a regional dude so I’m not at all familiar with the 737 at all. Does the MAX employ traditional AOA vanes or smart probes for AOA information? From what I’ve been able to ascertain from my google-fu, only one faulty AOA sensor is enough to trigger the system which is basically similar to a stick pusher that can not be manually overridden. It does seem risky to have a single point failure that can lead to severe pitch controllability issues.
My understanding of MCAS is that it drives nose-down trim in the event of a stall condition, and it was a fix required for certification of stall characteristics. Problem is it looks like one faulty sensor will trigger the MCAS, and I think also stall warnings. So you get a lot of distractions while MCAS is driving trim nose down. Might not notice it instantly, or might not recognize that it's a malfunction vice a legit reaction to stall (by either pilot or automation).

I can understand how the lion air guys got in trouble, not knowing what they were dealing with. At this point I would think all MAX pilots would be spring-loaded on this issue. If not yesterday, they should be today.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 04:25 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 894
Default

Should be a good time to buy Boeing stock
123494 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices