Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2019, 07:43 AM
  #611  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by B757 View Post
..I think Boeing has really just now found out about the reliance to automation, and the cultural issues, that exist at some of these Asian carriers..Neither one of these accidents, discussed here, would have happened in the US, as the crews flying these planes there are at a completely different level of experience, and competency..I bet Boeing did not see this coming, as their planes are designed, and flown, to meet the standards that exist in the US..

..BTW you will not see me, or my family, traveling on any of those Asian airlines..We will drive or take a ship..

Fly safe,
B757

What about incompetency at designing an aircraft that you have to compensate for with this MCAS system? If they are that concerns about these "Asian" airlines operation then why sell these airplanes to them ?

Clearly greed and profits won over the safety concern of the passengers .
Bluemoon20 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:09 AM
  #612  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
Default

Originally Posted by Bluemoon20 View Post
What about incompetency at designing an aircraft that you have to compensate for with this MCAS system? If they are that concerns about these "Asian" airlines operation then why sell these airplanes to them ?

Clearly greed and profits won over the safety concern of the passengers .
This wasn't incompetency; it was an alternate compliance design feature for Part 25 certification,which was approved by the FAA, and which didn't cause either aircraft to crash. The AoA failure is another matter, and while much has been said ignorantly of airlines which chose not to include features and alerts, in neither case did the AoA failure cause the crash, either. In both cases, the existing procedures were enough to have made the event at best a nuisance; a simple abnormal easily handled with a flyable aircraft. In both cases, bad airmanship lead to a fatal crash.

MCAS moves the trim slowly, and in very small increments, and can be stopped at any time. Given that it only operates when the autopilot is not engaged, trim action observed when the autopilot is not in use and when the pilot is not trimming (and trim can't be missed in the 737) is obviously trim running when it should not, and there is a procedure for this...which has been the same procedure for several decades. It's not complicated, it's not rocket science, and it's known; the Ethiopian crew even verbalized it....and obviously knew it, because they did it.

And undid it, accelerated beyond the design limits for the aircraft, and crashed...all due to pilot action.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 12:06 PM
  #613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
This wasn't incompetency; it was an alternate compliance design feature for Part 25 certification,which was approved by the FAA, and which didn't cause either aircraft to crash. The AoA failure is another matter, and while much has been said ignorantly of airlines which chose not to include features and alerts, in neither case did the AoA failure cause the crash, either. In both cases, the existing procedures were enough to have made the event at best a nuisance; a simple abnormal easily handled with a flyable aircraft. In both cases, bad airmanship lead to a fatal crash.

MCAS moves the trim slowly, and in very small increments, and can be stopped at any time. Given that it only operates when the autopilot is not engaged, trim action observed when the autopilot is not in use and when the pilot is not trimming (and trim can't be missed in the 737) is obviously trim running when it should not, and there is a procedure for this...which has been the same procedure for several decades. It's not complicated, it's not rocket science, and it's known; the Ethiopian crew even verbalized it....and obviously knew it, because they did it.

And undid it, accelerated beyond the design limits for the aircraft, and crashed...all due to pilot action.
So...why weren't Ethiopian and Lion Air airplanes falling out of the sky before MCAS?
Flightcap is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 12:28 PM
  #614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by Flightcap View Post
So...why weren't Ethiopian and Lion Air airplanes falling out of the sky before MCAS?
Because, thanks to using a single AOA input (pretty dumb, IMO), MCAS made it far more likely that the occasional crew would encounter a runway stabilizer. It rarely, if ever, happened prior to MCAS.

All that tells me is we're damn lucky that Boeing (and Airbus) make extremely reliable aircraft. When I fly as a pax on an airline that is likely crewed by a high percentage of children of magenta who have spent most of their flight experience watching an autopilot fly - I just say a little prayer and hope it's a vanilla flight.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 12:35 PM
  #615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Because, thanks to using a single AOA input (pretty dumb, IMO), MCAS made it far more likely that the occasional crew would encounter a runway stabilizer. It rarely, if ever, happened prior to MCAS.

All that tells me is we're damn lucky that Boeing (and Airbus) make extremely reliable aircraft. When I fly as a pax on an airline that is likely crewed by a high percentage of children of magenta who have spent most of their flight experience watching an autopilot fly - I just say a little prayer and hope it's a vanilla flight.
To me that says that at least some of the blame for this crash belongs with Boeing. Some here seem to be trying to take a hard line saying that the crash was 100% Boeing's fault or 100% the crew's fault. I think there's some blame to be given to both parties.
Flightcap is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 12:39 PM
  #616  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
Default

Originally Posted by Flightcap View Post
So...why weren't Ethiopian and Lion Air airplanes falling out of the sky before MCAS?
They didn't fall out of the sky with MCAS.

Two flight crews drove their aircraft into the ground. Big difference.

Very, very big difference.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 01:37 PM
  #617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by Flightcap View Post
To me that says that at least some of the blame for this crash belongs with Boeing. Some here seem to be trying to take a hard line saying that the crash was 100% Boeing's fault or 100% the crew's fault. I think there's some blame to be given to both parties.
Any accident that involves some kind of system malfunction could be partially blamed on the system or aircraft manufacturer or maybe maintenance.
But, as John B has been saying all along (and I agree 100%), pilots are supposed to be able to handle these things. Would you blame GE or Pratt&Whitney for a crash if it was a classic V1 cut on a nice VFR day, no terrain, no other factors and the crew put in the wrong rudder or shut down the wrong engine or didn’t maintain proper airspeed and crashed as a result? Malfunctions happen and we follow our training, use our systems knowledge, experience and FLY THE AIRPLANE. If airlines are putting someone in the pilot seats of their jets that can’t do that, it’s not Boeing’s fault. They make pretty docile, forgiving aircraft but they still require pilots... real actual pilots that can do more than run checklists, operate the basic systems and turn the autopilot on ASAP after takeoff.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 04:32 PM
  #618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,916
Default

There's no CRM at Asian Airlines, it's opposite their culture. I remember the B777 that hit the seawall at SFO. The new Captain receiving IOE stated he wanted to put his sunglasses on but was hesitant because the IOE Captain didn't have his on. How screwed up is that? (not implying sunglasses had anything to do with the accident).
AirBear is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 05:34 PM
  #619  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
Default

This has been going downhill since Boeing removed the dog from the cockpit. The one that was there to bite the pilot if he tried to touch anything.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 09:40 PM
  #620  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,468
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
There's no CRM at Asian Airlines, it's opposite their culture. I remember the B777 that hit the seawall at SFO. The new Captain receiving IOE stated he wanted to put his sunglasses on but was hesitant because the IOE Captain didn't have his on. How screwed up is that? (not implying sunglasses had anything to do with the accident).
The level of arrogance and ignorance in your post is only exceeded by your stupidity when you talk about "Asian Airlines" in a thread called "Ethiopian 737 max crash".
Please, grow a brain.
dera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices