Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash
#611
New Hire
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 6
..I think Boeing has really just now found out about the reliance to automation, and the cultural issues, that exist at some of these Asian carriers..Neither one of these accidents, discussed here, would have happened in the US, as the crews flying these planes there are at a completely different level of experience, and competency..I bet Boeing did not see this coming, as their planes are designed, and flown, to meet the standards that exist in the US..
..BTW you will not see me, or my family, traveling on any of those Asian airlines..We will drive or take a ship..
Fly safe,
B757
..BTW you will not see me, or my family, traveling on any of those Asian airlines..We will drive or take a ship..
Fly safe,
B757
What about incompetency at designing an aircraft that you have to compensate for with this MCAS system? If they are that concerns about these "Asian" airlines operation then why sell these airplanes to them ?
Clearly greed and profits won over the safety concern of the passengers .
#612
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
What about incompetency at designing an aircraft that you have to compensate for with this MCAS system? If they are that concerns about these "Asian" airlines operation then why sell these airplanes to them ?
Clearly greed and profits won over the safety concern of the passengers .
Clearly greed and profits won over the safety concern of the passengers .
MCAS moves the trim slowly, and in very small increments, and can be stopped at any time. Given that it only operates when the autopilot is not engaged, trim action observed when the autopilot is not in use and when the pilot is not trimming (and trim can't be missed in the 737) is obviously trim running when it should not, and there is a procedure for this...which has been the same procedure for several decades. It's not complicated, it's not rocket science, and it's known; the Ethiopian crew even verbalized it....and obviously knew it, because they did it.
And undid it, accelerated beyond the design limits for the aircraft, and crashed...all due to pilot action.
#613
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
This wasn't incompetency; it was an alternate compliance design feature for Part 25 certification,which was approved by the FAA, and which didn't cause either aircraft to crash. The AoA failure is another matter, and while much has been said ignorantly of airlines which chose not to include features and alerts, in neither case did the AoA failure cause the crash, either. In both cases, the existing procedures were enough to have made the event at best a nuisance; a simple abnormal easily handled with a flyable aircraft. In both cases, bad airmanship lead to a fatal crash.
MCAS moves the trim slowly, and in very small increments, and can be stopped at any time. Given that it only operates when the autopilot is not engaged, trim action observed when the autopilot is not in use and when the pilot is not trimming (and trim can't be missed in the 737) is obviously trim running when it should not, and there is a procedure for this...which has been the same procedure for several decades. It's not complicated, it's not rocket science, and it's known; the Ethiopian crew even verbalized it....and obviously knew it, because they did it.
And undid it, accelerated beyond the design limits for the aircraft, and crashed...all due to pilot action.
MCAS moves the trim slowly, and in very small increments, and can be stopped at any time. Given that it only operates when the autopilot is not engaged, trim action observed when the autopilot is not in use and when the pilot is not trimming (and trim can't be missed in the 737) is obviously trim running when it should not, and there is a procedure for this...which has been the same procedure for several decades. It's not complicated, it's not rocket science, and it's known; the Ethiopian crew even verbalized it....and obviously knew it, because they did it.
And undid it, accelerated beyond the design limits for the aircraft, and crashed...all due to pilot action.
#614
All that tells me is we're damn lucky that Boeing (and Airbus) make extremely reliable aircraft. When I fly as a pax on an airline that is likely crewed by a high percentage of children of magenta who have spent most of their flight experience watching an autopilot fly - I just say a little prayer and hope it's a vanilla flight.
#615
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Because, thanks to using a single AOA input (pretty dumb, IMO), MCAS made it far more likely that the occasional crew would encounter a runway stabilizer. It rarely, if ever, happened prior to MCAS.
All that tells me is we're damn lucky that Boeing (and Airbus) make extremely reliable aircraft. When I fly as a pax on an airline that is likely crewed by a high percentage of children of magenta who have spent most of their flight experience watching an autopilot fly - I just say a little prayer and hope it's a vanilla flight.
All that tells me is we're damn lucky that Boeing (and Airbus) make extremely reliable aircraft. When I fly as a pax on an airline that is likely crewed by a high percentage of children of magenta who have spent most of their flight experience watching an autopilot fly - I just say a little prayer and hope it's a vanilla flight.
#616
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
#617
But, as John B has been saying all along (and I agree 100%), pilots are supposed to be able to handle these things. Would you blame GE or Pratt&Whitney for a crash if it was a classic V1 cut on a nice VFR day, no terrain, no other factors and the crew put in the wrong rudder or shut down the wrong engine or didn’t maintain proper airspeed and crashed as a result? Malfunctions happen and we follow our training, use our systems knowledge, experience and FLY THE AIRPLANE. If airlines are putting someone in the pilot seats of their jets that can’t do that, it’s not Boeing’s fault. They make pretty docile, forgiving aircraft but they still require pilots... real actual pilots that can do more than run checklists, operate the basic systems and turn the autopilot on ASAP after takeoff.
#618
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,916
There's no CRM at Asian Airlines, it's opposite their culture. I remember the B777 that hit the seawall at SFO. The new Captain receiving IOE stated he wanted to put his sunglasses on but was hesitant because the IOE Captain didn't have his on. How screwed up is that? (not implying sunglasses had anything to do with the accident).
#620
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,468
There's no CRM at Asian Airlines, it's opposite their culture. I remember the B777 that hit the seawall at SFO. The new Captain receiving IOE stated he wanted to put his sunglasses on but was hesitant because the IOE Captain didn't have his on. How screwed up is that? (not implying sunglasses had anything to do with the accident).
Please, grow a brain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post