Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash
#821
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Defrauding federal regulators is a felony. If Boeing can pin this on their employees, and they just hired the experts in doing exactly this, they can substantially reduce their civil liability.
#822
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,006
You lied, then. No criminal charges. You can neither cite them, nor the law, and made it up based on your uneducated guess of what might happen in your fantasy world. That's all you really needed to say.
#823
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 – False Statements to a Government Agency.
#824
Like I said - they made it smaller several generations ago. Requires more leverage. Maybe it should have an electric motor you can engage when it’s impossible to move manually. Oh wait ...
#826
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,006
You're still lying, but now attempting to defend the lie.
There are no criminal charges. You lied.
#827
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Lying to the FBI is a federal crime. That's what Martha Stewart went to jail for. In the Boeing case the FBI is doing a criminal investigation into the certification process. Anyone accused of lying to the FBI would have to be charged and convicted in court (or plead guilty) in order to be sentenced. No one has been charged with anything as yet, as far as I can tell. Anyone interviewed by the FBI, and there will at least be two of them, should have their own lawyer, not only Boeing's lawyer, present and record the meeting. Had General Flynn done the same he would likely not be in any trouble today.
#828
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/26/polit...law/index.html
New flaw discovered with the MAX, a failure of the microprocessor.
When testing the potential failure of the microprocessor in the simulators, "it was difficult for the test pilots to recover in a matter of seconds," one of the sources said. "And if you can't recover in a matter of seconds, that's an unreasonable risk."
Why can't test pilots recover using the stab trim runaway procedure in a matter of seconds?
New flaw discovered with the MAX, a failure of the microprocessor.
When testing the potential failure of the microprocessor in the simulators, "it was difficult for the test pilots to recover in a matter of seconds," one of the sources said. "And if you can't recover in a matter of seconds, that's an unreasonable risk."
Why can't test pilots recover using the stab trim runaway procedure in a matter of seconds?
#829
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/26/polit...law/index.html
New flaw discovered with the MAX, a failure of the microprocessor.
When testing the potential failure of the microprocessor in the simulators, "it was difficult for the test pilots to recover in a matter of seconds," one of the sources said. "And if you can't recover in a matter of seconds, that's an unreasonable risk."
Why can't test pilots recover using the stab trim runaway procedure in a matter of seconds?
New flaw discovered with the MAX, a failure of the microprocessor.
When testing the potential failure of the microprocessor in the simulators, "it was difficult for the test pilots to recover in a matter of seconds," one of the sources said. "And if you can't recover in a matter of seconds, that's an unreasonable risk."
Why can't test pilots recover using the stab trim runaway procedure in a matter of seconds?
#830
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 269
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash
737 Pilot sues Boeing for Career Damage. Emotional Stress.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/24/busin...uit/index.html
Who is this jack wagon?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/24/busin...uit/index.html
Who is this jack wagon?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by airlinegypsy; 06-26-2019 at 03:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post