Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2019, 07:55 PM
  #851  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
I certainly am not a pilot. But I don’t believe I need to be one to tell who’s right from wrong in this situation. Judging by the responses, some individuals definitely know what they’re talking about, you can tell they know their way around a 737, and it shows. They’re basically arguing with someone who’s either bringing way too much emotion into it, using scenarios that didn’t happen. What I do understand, is that Boeing specifically said to not put the switches back for remainder of flight. And the pilots went against that procedure. Im sure Boeing will be blamed for some things in the final report, but I can assume the pilots will too. And if it is, it’s clear to me that the aircraft was in fact, flyable throughout the entire fiasco. But unfortunately the pilots made some errors. I feel bad for all involved as well as understanding the amount of pressure the pilots may have had, but in the end we simply cannot allow such pilots to fly. I sure would not board my flight if I knew beforehand that the pilots weren’t good under pressure. Perhaps there is a flaw with the training, that airlines are responsible for. Maybe many Airlines take advantage of the auto pilot system. Then again, both accidents did occur in two third world countries who are known for not regulating much. I sure won’t be flying with Ethiopia Air, and I definitely won’t be flying with Lion Air.
You need to separate the crashes from the regulatory issues. Boeing is not going to face any judgement over the accidents, as they were clearly pilot error.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 08:49 AM
  #852  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,273
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
You need to separate the crashes from the regulatory issues. Boeing is not going to face any judgement over the accidents, as they were clearly pilot error.
BA may be on the hook for more than liability if it turns out they abused their regulatory discretion to self-certify. That could amount to flying an airplane which was technically not certified.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 03:59 PM
  #853  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
You need to separate the crashes from the regulatory issues. Boeing is not going to face any judgement over the accidents, as they were clearly pilot error.
“Clearly” pilot error. Well shoot, someone tell the European, Chinese, Africans, and Asians.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 09:16 AM
  #854  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
“Clearly” pilot error. Well shoot, someone tell the European, Chinese, Africans, and Asians.
Well in the case of Ethiopian, they were certainly test pilots, maneuvering above Vmo with inoperative trim. You still have to fly the aircraft, even if that aircraft is trying to kill you. That said, obviously the 737 is not airworthy because of both control, and regulatory issues.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 10:44 AM
  #855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

So absolutely no love for these guys? Continuous hand flying through stick shaker at liftoff, stab runaway, flight director & PF airspeed unreliable. Thrust reduction fail at acceleration height, missed opportunity for corrective action at QRH step 3. Do I copy that right? 5 minutes.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 12:28 PM
  #856  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
So absolutely no love for these guys? Continuous hand flying through stick shaker at liftoff, stab runaway, flight director & PF airspeed unreliable. Thrust reduction fail at acceleration height, missed opportunity for corrective action at QRH step 3. Do I copy that right? 5 minutes.
The aircraft was controllable till the reactivation of a malfunctioning system, which was against the checklist procedure. That's certainly an error no?
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 12:46 PM
  #857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
The aircraft was controllable till the reactivation of a malfunctioning system, which was against the checklist procedure. That's certainly an error no?
Unable to overpower physics as the lawn dart gained momentum, I might have gone back to what appeared (trim switches) to work earlier too. Loss of situational awareness, it happens. Much better odds if you haven't been set up.

Just another pudknocker waiting. One hopeful a culture of impunity didn't override credible objections, setting the stage for tragic loss of life and capital. 'This isn't Russia is it Danny?'
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 02:50 PM
  #858  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 131
Default

Two airline pilots, one with several thousand hours of experience, never touched the thrust levers (from what I have read). Take off power for the entire episode.

Think about that. Basic. Aviation 101.
Truthanator is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 03:29 PM
  #859  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Unable to overpower physics as the lawn dart gained momentum, I might have gone back to what appeared (trim switches) to work earlier too. Loss of situational awareness, it happens. Much better odds if you haven't been set up.

Just another pudknocker waiting. One hopeful a culture of impunity didn't override credible objections, setting the stage for tragic loss of life and capital. 'This isn't Russia is it Danny?'
From the preliminary report, it sounds like they were focused on maintaining an assigned altitude, and heading. That may have been an additional workload contributing to the accident, it seems they forgot about airspeed in the process. From the FDR, it doesn't look like they touched the power levers at all.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-06-2019, 03:58 AM
  #860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
From the preliminary report, it sounds like they were focused on maintaining an assigned altitude, and heading. That may have been an additional workload contributing to the accident, it seems they forgot about airspeed in the process. From the FDR, it doesn't look like they touched the power levers at all.
Well, a lot of FAA pilots, airline pilots, and Boeing pilots crashed or nearly crashed the simulators when presented with the same conditions - and they KNEW ahead of time about the malfunction to be thrown their way.
F4E Mx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices