Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Boeing 737 Max's Autopilot Has Problem >

Boeing 737 Max's Autopilot Has Problem

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Boeing 737 Max's Autopilot Has Problem

Old 07-08-2019, 05:26 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 330
Default Boeing 737 Max's Autopilot Has Problem

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...bUbHUtlH2EMHs4

Boeing 737 Max's Autopilot Has Problem, European Regulators Find
Benjamin D Katz

Europe’s aviation regulator has outlined five major requirements it wants Boeing Co. to address before it will allow the planemaker’s 737 Max to return to service, according to a person familiar with the matter. One of them, about the jet’s autopilot function, hasn’t surfaced previously as an area of concern.

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency has sent its list to both the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing, the person said, asking not to be identified because the details aren’t yet public. The FAA hasn’t publicly discussed details about what changes it’s demanding on the Max, so it’s difficult to know whether the EASA demands differ dramatically -- and whether they would significantly boost the cost and time to get the Max back in the air.

Regulators worldwide grounded Boeing’s best-selling plane in March following two crashes in five months that killed a total of 346 people.

Boeing’s Grounded 737 Max -- The Story So Far: QuickTake

The issues being raised by EASA are consistent with the FAA’s own questions, said a person familiar with the U.S. agency’s work who wasn’t authorized to speak about the matter. In a statement, the FAA declined to confirm the specific matters being raised by EASA but said: “The FAA continues to work closely with other validating civil aviation authorities on our review of Boeing’s certification documentation for the 737 MAX. This process involves regular communications among all parties.”

Asked about the potential impact of EASA’s concerns, Boeing issued a statement saying company officials continue “to engage with regulators and are providing information as we work towards the safe return to service for the MAX.”

Autopilot Concerns

EASA’s checklist includes a number of issues that have been disclosed: the potential difficulty pilots have in turning the jet’s manual trim wheel, the unreliability of the Max’s angle of attack sensors, inadequate training procedures, and a software issue flagged just last week by the FAA pertaining to a lagging microprocessor. But the agency also listed a previously unreported concern: the autopilot failing to disengage in certain emergencies.

“Any of these could significantly affect the return to service, but we don’t know if they are actually going to become requirements or are they just items for discussion,’’ said John Cox, a former 737 pilot who is president of the aviation consulting company Safety Operating Systems.

Cox said that such questions between regulators are the norm during aircraft certification work and may not pose new risks for Boeing.

The one issue Cox said he hadn’t previously heard about involved the autopilot. Having to alter a system as complex as the 737’s autopilot could have major ramifications, he said. However, he said he isn’t aware of any underlying safety issues with the autopilot that would justify such an action.

The European regulator has found that the autopilot doesn’t always properly disengage, which could mean that pilots wouldn’t have the time to intervene before the plane begins to stall.

The EASA list excludes several other smaller issues that the agency hasn’t flagged as critical. The agency’s findings follow its broad, independent review of the 737 family’s entire flight control system that focused on the differences between the Max variant and the older “Next Generation” model, the person said. EASA opted to conduct its own assessment of the aircraft.

The review has become a critical focal point for the industry in gauging when the plane will be able to fly again, with regulators globally expected to lean on EASA’s findings. The FAA is facing multiple investigations over its handling of the original certification of the Max and the so-called Manuevering Characteristics Augmentation System that has been linked to both crashes.

Boeing Reprograms 737 System Linked to Crashes

A software update will prevent a single sensor from activating the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System. The data from both sensors will be considered.
Sources: Boeing, Mentourpilot
It’s not clear how difficult it will be for Boeing to address the issues described above. People familiar with the matter told Bloomberg last week that the latest software problem could take as long as three months to fix. The FAA has also previously denied that the trim wheel -- which is used to lift or lower a plane’s nose during an emergency -- would cause delays.

Potentially more complex will be addressing the AOA, or angle of attack, sensors on which MCAS relies. At the time of the Ethiopian crash in March, Boeing’s system was using just one of the two sensors installed on the plane. EASA director Patrick Ky said in an interview last month that retrofitting additional hardware was not off the table, a measure that could be costly and time consuming for the manufacturer.

EASA, in its recommendations, stopped short of telling Boeing how to address the issues, instead asking the company to propose solutions that will then be assessed, the person said. For example, if Boeing can prove the effectiveness of a new training procedure that doesn’t include the more burdensome requirement for simulator training, it could avoid that additional expense.

Coordinating Relaunch

Both the FAA and EASA along with Canada and Brazil, have meanwhile come together in tentative agreement that the return to service should be closely coordinated in an effort to help restore public trust in the global aviation safety system, people familiar with the matter have said, though they cautioned that EASA may still make additional requests and lag behind the FAA.

A spokesman for EASA wasn’t immediately able to comment. FAA acting Administrator Daniel Elwell has said that the grounded plane won’t be returned to service until the agency can be assured it is safe and pilots are adequately trained to handle any emergencies.

Boeing has been telling customers and others in the industry that it expects the plane will be returned to service by September. That timetable includes fixing the software implicated in the two crashes as well as the latest flaw identified with the microprocessor, said a person familiar with the company’s guidance.

— With assistance by Julie Johnsson

(Updates with autopilot details, expert comments from first paragraph.)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE
docav8tor is offline  
Old 07-09-2019, 06:45 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

I was afraid they'd find some other issues while they were digging.

If they find anything which can't be fixed with software, then it's going to get really ugly...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-09-2019, 08:39 AM
  #3  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I was afraid they'd find some other issues while they were digging.

If they find anything which can't be fixed with software, then it's going to get really ugly...
You take most any piece of transportation equipment that’s fifty years old and compare it to modern standards and it’s going to fail. Most of the ferry systems and passenger rail lines don’t meet current life-safety codes and operate only under “grandfather” clauses.

An example:

https://komonews.com/archive/danger-...-below-seattle
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-09-2019, 02:12 PM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
You take most any piece of transportation equipment that’s fifty years old and compare it to modern standards and it’s going to fail. Most of the ferry systems and passenger rail lines don’t meet current life-safety codes and operate only under “grandfather” clauses.

An example:

https://komonews.com/archive/danger-...-below-seattle
I think there's a practical limit, if they go back and start looking at previous versions of the 73, well they know the FAA could find a reason to ground the bus (or anything else) if they really wanted to.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-09-2019, 05:25 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dustrpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: AT802
Posts: 241
Default

https://mattstoller.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dustrpilot is offline  
Old 07-09-2019, 08:25 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,907
Default

Originally Posted by dustrpilot View Post
Good read.
AirBear is offline  
Old 07-10-2019, 07:27 AM
  #7  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
Good read.
Very interesting. A few stretches, but mostly plausible and/or verifiable.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-10-2019, 10:20 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Boeing would have been better off keeping the 757 in production and pulling the plug on the 737. The 737 MAX10 is scheduled to seat about the same number of passengers as the 757-200. You can imagine what kind of cattle car the MAX 10 will be.
F4E Mx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
antiguogrumete
Your Photos and Videos
0
09-11-2018 08:04 AM
Clinton
Flight Schools and Training
1
04-30-2010 11:34 AM
vagabond
Union Talk
0
07-13-2009 05:45 PM
fireman0174
Major
16
04-18-2007 09:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices