Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Atlas Houston

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2020, 07:16 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,343
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
PRD should help put a stop to that. It's a single consolidated database, one-stop shopping. Unlike PRIA which is very cumbersome and depends on employers from the distant past to 1) still be in business, 2) still have records, and 3) process PRIA requests correctly.

I think PRD has a benefit for pilots too... you can instantly see what your history is. With PRIA employers do not have to give you that info unless you have actually applied for another job and the new employer processes the PRIA paperwork.
I see PRD making job applications much easier and lower-stress for a lot of folks too. Either something is or is not displayed. There will be no more "should I report this?" types of questions. Imagine the numbers of 20-something pilots applying for jobs that no longer have to fret about whether or not to report things.
Elevation is offline  
Old 02-06-2020, 09:04 AM
  #162  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,223
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
I see PRD making job applications much easier and lower-stress for a lot of folks too. Either something is or is not displayed. There will be no more "should I report this?" types of questions. Imagine the numbers of 20-something pilots applying for jobs that no longer have to fret about whether or not to report things.
That's probably safe enough for past employer issues.

For FAA stuff, better just report it. Even if is something is missing (properly or erroneously) from PRD, majors still can and do FOIA your FAA file. You should FOIA your FAA (and FBI) file too before you apply to majors. Admin mistake are not as rare as one might think.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-06-2020, 09:46 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,343
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That's probably safe enough for past employer issues.

For FAA stuff, better just report it. Even if is something is missing (properly or erroneously) from PRD, majors still can and do FOIA your FAA file. You should FOIA your FAA (and FBI) file too before you apply to majors. Admin mistake are not as rare as one might think.
Agreed. Filler.
Elevation is offline  
Old 02-08-2020, 12:58 PM
  #164  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
Agreed. Filler.
My T-37 instructor always said “Everytime you fly, assume someone is out to kill you. Your job is to find out who and how! Some days it may be you!”
Moonraker is offline  
Old 02-08-2020, 01:00 PM
  #165  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
Agreed. Filler.
My T-37 instructor always said “Everytime you fly, assume someone is out to kill you. Your job is to find out who and how! Some days it may be you!”
Moonraker is offline  
Old 02-08-2020, 03:51 PM
  #166  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Ethiopian? The FO trimmed the wheel the wrong way (nose down) by a little amount. And then reported to the CA he couldn’t get the trim wheel to work.

Both cases thrust was forward and stayed that way the entire time. Yes, you need to dissipate speed in order to use the manual trim wheel. Or, and this is gonna sound crazy, slow down below Vmax and stop the over speed clacker.

The Ethiopian CA’s plan from the get go was to engage the autopilot. When the trim cutout switches and wheel trimming didn’t work for them (because of incompetence and information overload), they re-engaged the stab trim cutout switches. To re-engage them implies they wanted to use the yoke trim switch aggressively. But they never did. They flicked it a couple times and that was it. MCAS activated again. The CA was pulling about half back on the yoke just to hold level, and losing the battle. He tried to engage the AP again. It didn’t work because the plane was out of whack with mis-trimming. In his last second attempt to re-engage the AP, he released all back pressure on the yoke and tried to engage the AP. That was the kiss of death, releasing the back pressure. But again, shows you how desperate the CA was and wanting to use the AP to “fly” his airplane.

Lion Air I can understand, no one knew of MCAS ramifications, but this Eth crew knew via the emergency bulletins and the behavior to expect. They should have been able to recover from it. Pure incompetence.


I heard that the movements from the manual trim could also be from the aerodynamic forces, a result of leaving throttles at full the entire time? Is it a possibility?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Firefighter is offline  
Old 02-08-2020, 05:02 PM
  #167  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,223
Default

Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
I heard that the movements from the manual trim could also be from the aerodynamic forces, a result of leaving throttles at full the entire time? Is it a possibility?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No. Aerodynamic forces could not move the trim (Google Jack screw THS) to learn why not.

Aerodynamic force can and will make the trim harder to actuate. The electric trim motor doesn't notice but a pilot manually trimming will notice.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-16-2020, 09:53 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,912
Default

Most of this has already been posted on this thread, but this is more official. I really wonder if the FAA is dragging their feet on the single point of contact pilot records check. That'll take away the "plausible deniability" for lower tier operators that hire from the bottom of the barrel. I remember reading the NTSB report on either the Hawker 700 at CAK or the Learjet at TEB, I forget which, but that copilot had a terrible checkride and work history and the charter company owner played dumb saying he had contracted out the PRIA check to a 3rd party and wasn't aware. Also, the Captain on one of those accidents had a felony conviction for assault with a deadly weapon that he had neglected to disclose to the FAA.

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...r-3591-downing

NTSB Public Docket Reveals Crew Confusion, Training Discrepancies in Atlas Air 3591 Downing

by Rob Finfrock
- January 13, 2020, 12:34 PMAlthough the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not yet issued its probable cause determination in the Feb. 23, 2019 downing of an Atlas Air Boeing 767 freighter near Houston, Texas, information contained in the Board's recently-released public docket on the investigation paints a picture of a confused flight crew working against one another trying to keep their aircraft in the sky.

Flight 3591 from Miami International Airport (MIA) had proceeded normally for most of its journey to George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), with captain Ricky Blakely, first officer Conrad Aska, and jump-seater Sean Archuleta, a recently promoted captain at Mesa Airlines, discussing their respective employers and the flying qualities of the Boeing 767.

Aska, the pilot flying, reported to Blakely as the aircraft approached IAH that his primary flight display appeared to be showing incorrect aircraft orientation on the horizontal situation indicator (HSI), but the crewmembers later determined the instrument was functioning properly.

The situation deteriorated as the Boeing descended through 10,000 feet msl and maneuvered around thunderstorms circling IAH while approaching to land on Runway 26L. The aircraft's flight data recorder (FDR) noted "triaxial acceleration magnitudes increased" at an altitude of approximately 6,500 feet, "consistent with the aircraft entering light to moderate turbulence," according to the NTSB FDR specialist's factual report.

Five seconds later, the aircraft's go-around autothrottle mode activated and "the engines began advancing to go-around thrust setting," according to the report. However, neither pilot seemed aware the mode had been selected or that their aircraft was now configuring for a 2,000 foot-per-minute climb; until about 10 seconds later, when Aska suddenly pitched the aircraft nose down but did not touch the throttles.

"Whoa, my speed, my speed," Aska stated, according to the NTSB’s cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript. "We’re stalling. Stall." However, FDR data indicates the aircraft was flying normally at a computed airspeed of approximately 250 knots prior to the nose pitching down in response to the first officer’s control inputs. Citing a physiologist, the NTSB noted Aska may have been disoriented by the increase in speed while operating in instrument meteorological conditions.

According to the FDR, Blakely then pulled back on his yoke as Aska continued pushing forward, resulting in "a split between left and right elevators...ranging between 2 to 7 degrees," according to the NTSB. The aircraft continued to descend, with airspeed increasing beyond 350 knots.

The plane's autothrottles switched out of go-around mode as the aircraft descended through 3,000 feet, by which time the aircraft had descended under the cloud cover and was in visual conditions. The FDR indicates both Aska and Blakely then pulled back on their yokes to the full aft position, where they remained until the aircraft crashed into a shallow bay approximately 40 miles southeast of IAH.

"Aircraft pitch was about 50 degrees nose down," the FDR report stated. "Vertical acceleration went from 0 g to 4.2 g and pitch increased rapidly until its final recorded position of 16 degrees nose down...The final recorded airspeed was 433.5 kts."

PILOTS’ EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING HISTORIES HIGHLIGHTED

Investigators also found that Aska, 44, had a problematic employment and training history prior to his hiring at Atlas in 2017. He joined the freight operation from Mesa Airlines, which he left after failing two flight simulator checkouts for promotion to captain on the Embraer 175 regional jet. One Mesa captain who evaluated him told the NTSB that Aska would "make frantic mistakes [and] start pushing a lot of buttons without thinking about what he was pushing."

Earlier in his flying career, Aska had been briefly employed by regional airlines Air Wisconsin and Commutair but had left after four months and one month, respectively, due to failure to satisfactorily complete training at both carriers. He did not list his time with those airlines when applying at Atlas, the NTSB noted.

Both Aska and Blakely, 60, also underwent remedial instruction at Atlas, with the latter enrolled in the carrier’s proficiency watch program in 2015 after he initially failed his 767 checkride. Blakely was approved to fly the 767 later that year, following successful retraining on proper stall recovery and missed approach procedures.

Aska also failed his initial checkride at Atlas, due to what company pilots told the NTSB was "unsatisfactory performance in crew resource management, threat and error management, non-precision approaches, steep turns, and judgment." He ultimately passed the checkride after more remedial training, with the chief pilot at Atlas telling investigators he'd chalked up the first officer's previous difficulties to nerves and family issues.

That pilot told the NTSB that he'd intended to informally monitor Aska's performance going forward, but the carrier did not place Aska under a dedicated proficiency watch program as mandated by the FAA.
AirBear is offline  
Old 02-16-2020, 11:07 AM
  #169  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,223
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
Most of this has already been posted on this thread, but this is more official. I really wonder if the FAA is dragging their feet on the single point of contact pilot records check. That'll take away the "plausible deniability" for lower tier operators that hire from the bottom of the barrel.
Pretty Machiavellian, but not utterly impossible. It could upset the apple-cart at the lower-tier. Maybe stalling until the pilot shortage subsides a bit.

More likely just government business as usual.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-23-2020, 04:41 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

1 year ago today. RIP to the crew.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FmrPropCapt
Atlas/Polar
1130
03-25-2019 07:56 AM
LAXative
Atlas/Polar
31
04-06-2016 10:02 AM
F15andMD11
Cargo
18
03-03-2010 04:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
48
12-28-2009 11:11 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices