Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Boeing 737 MAX Investigation >

Boeing 737 MAX Investigation

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Boeing 737 MAX Investigation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2020, 09:24 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,400
Default

I think the real crime is that Boeing and a compliant FAA sold this as just another 737. It may be similar, but us a different animal in some ways which should have required at the very least training on the MCAS system.
Rama is offline  
Old 12-20-2020, 07:10 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Just my opinion, there appears to be new training requirements for the previous 737 models that have been flying for decades. If you have not had a chance to read the FAA’s FSB Report for the B-737, recommend you take a look and read very carefully or you will overlook the new training requirements for the old airplanes.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 01:17 PM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Good insight from Tim Clark, I think he nailed it...


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-b...KBN29I32E?il=0
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-02-2021, 09:12 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 128
Default

Looks like a witch hunt to me...

https://youtu.be/KdfX5P9Sxv8?t=369
takingmessages is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 11:19 AM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by takingmessages View Post
Looks like a witch hunt to me...

https://youtu.be/KdfX5P9Sxv8?t=369
I disagree, Dan's just whipping the regulatory ponies again. Forkner went on the record as to intentionally misleading the FAA in regards to certification... that's easy to prosecute and well deserved. He did it to himself. The guy had PLENTY of mil and civilian aviation and regulatory experience, he knew better.

Are managers culpable too? Obviously, but proving that bad management (or bad priorities) equates to a crime is hard.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-04-2021, 09:01 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Culpable indifference, negligence, ok. Fraud? Easier to prosecute than RICO anyway. They're still aiming high. What a nightmare.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 11-04-2021, 10:40 AM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

FAA: Boeing still has "work to do".


https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...do-2021-11-03/
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-06-2021, 06:56 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

A jury must agree the defendant intentionally acted to validate MCAS fully aware a deficiency existed beyond standards set for certification. When defense counters, upon stacks of supporting documentation and credible witness testimony, the chief technical pilot exercised authority reasonably consistent with benchmark BA sign-offs, not guilty. But if you're a fan of confidence game fiction, WN would be the in-and-in on this score. Aunt Sally misuse of Justice time & $$$. Hang on Skip.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 11-06-2021, 07:44 AM
  #19  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Culpable indifference, negligence, ok. Fraud? Easier to prosecute than RICO anyway. They're still aiming high. What a nightmare.
He made it easy for them, jury won't like his commentary and the defense will have to get them to compartmentalize that from whatever he may have actually done.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-09-2021, 05:35 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Shouldn't have come this far. Glib, doubt wracked comments exploding into a legal fire only Mrs. O'Leary's cow could fully appreciate. Makes me wonder about all the goo I've puked out here. Fraud is a serious fed offense. To draft one using an engineer's grifting pen, slick. Do you pad regular pay or wire a Cayman branch account? No one saw this coming. Nobody. BS indictment. Scripted for media feed on behalf of institutional barons, busy buffing crud off their lampoon logos. Stark contrast to the lone pilot accused. Harrumph.
METO Guido is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Safety
10
09-24-2019 12:20 PM
docav8tor
Safety
6
08-02-2019 07:58 AM
docav8tor
Safety
0
07-20-2019 08:00 AM
docav8tor
Safety
7
07-10-2019 10:20 AM
essw
Regional
7
06-27-2009 12:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices