Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
737-400 cargo jet emergency landing in ocean >

737-400 cargo jet emergency landing in ocean

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

737-400 cargo jet emergency landing in ocean

Old 07-03-2021, 05:00 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: C172 CFI
Posts: 365
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
glad everyone made it out ok.
Iím not sure that critical condition and serious condition are really OK. Hopefully they both pull through.
Duckdude is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 06:06 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 1,804
Default

Originally Posted by Duckdude View Post
Iím not sure that critical condition and serious condition are really OK. Hopefully they both pull through.
better than the alternative
ugleeual is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 07:35 AM
  #43  
On Reserve
 
TheBum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by 501D22G View Post
My post was 100% sarcasm.

It could be in 15,000 ft of water, luckily it's not. Still gonna be a bear.

Also, I'm sure the airplane was a highly polished turd. The only people flying -200s should be 3rd-world s##tholes, and even they manage to put brand new metal in the dirt.


I saw in a local article the exact location is approx 150ft deepÖ not sure if that is accurate or not but it was quoted several times.
TheBum is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 09:39 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,172
Default

NTSB is sending a crew of 10. They appear to be taking it very seriously as they should as a dual engine failure on a transport category jet is unheard of.
It was obviously an old aircraft, but if this happened on a pax plane the outcome would have been much worse.
Kudos to the Coast Guard for saving the crew.
Rama is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 09:44 AM
  #45  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 2,893
Default

How many pax planes out there still run JT8ís?
In places that we vaguely care about?
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 10:35 AM
  #46  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 30,818
Default

Originally Posted by TheBum View Post
I saw in a local article the exact location is approx 150ft deepÖ not sure if that is accurate or not but it was quoted several times.
That's a far less technical dive, run of the mill commercial/salvage ops.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 10:45 AM
  #47  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 30,818
Default

Originally Posted by Rama View Post
NTSB is sending a crew of 10. They appear to be taking it very seriously as they should as a dual engine failure on a transport category jet is unheard of.
It was obviously an old aircraft, but if this happened on a pax plane the outcome would have been much worse.
Kudos to the Coast Guard for saving the crew.
Could have been dual failure due to an issue which affected both motors... that would be significant but also pretty darn rare. Birds (Sully) or something like that BA triple at LHR.

Could also be that the "good" motor was tired and they inadvertently cooked it when they added thrust to compensate for the first failure. The timeline hints at that possibility.

I just don't think they could have run out of gas that quickly. Although an RJ a few years back managed to TO with just enough gas to get to the flight levels. They caught it barely in time, diverted, landed and may have flamed out on the taxi in.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 10:48 AM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 30,818
Default

Originally Posted by Duckdude View Post
Iím not sure that critical condition and serious condition are really OK. Hopefully they both pull through.
Hoping. But since they both managed to exit the aircraft and hold on to floating stuff for a while I'm guessing they'll survive since they got to the hospital pretty quickly (that matters, a lot).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 12:38 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 110
Default

I can tell you the crash site is not zoned off to vessels. I Captain a charter boat, and transited the area today looking for any sign of the location/depth. Nada.

If its 150í an advanced diver can hit it for a few minutes with no decompression required.

Last edited by WacoQCF; 07-03-2021 at 01:22 PM.
WacoQCF is offline  
Old 07-03-2021, 02:49 PM
  #50  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 30,818
Default

Originally Posted by WacoQCF View Post
I can tell you the crash site is not zoned off to vessels. I Captain a charter boat, and transited the area today looking for any sign of the location/depth. Nada.

If its 150’ an advanced diver can hit it for a few minutes with no decompression required.
For something like this, commercial divers would use mixed gas. You could get about 10 minutes no-D with mixed gas... using professional tables. So still probably going to be a surface-supplied op.

I don't think you'd catch me going to 150' on air and coming back up without a stop... even though the mil tables probably say you can, barely.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iceman49
Safety
2
07-01-2014 07:02 PM
RealityCheck
Safety
70
08-18-2013 04:04 PM
IFLY22
Aviation Law
10
10-26-2011 01:43 PM
ryane946
Cargo
12
02-14-2006 09:13 AM
fireman0174
Major
1
02-08-2006 11:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread