Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Safety (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/safety/)
-   -   560XL+ 4 fatal Connecticut (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/safety/134897-560xl-4-fatal-connecticut.html)

TiredSoul 09-02-2021 04:24 PM

560XL+ 4 fatal Connecticut
 
4 fatal

No experience on type but that seems like a big airplane for a little runway.
Really only SE piston and one helicopter showing on Flightaware.
Kathryn's Report: Cessna 560 Citation XLS+, N560AR: Fatal accident occurred September 02, 2021 near Robertson Field Airport (4B8), Plainville, Hartford County, Connecticut

rickair7777 09-03-2021 10:30 AM

It's a slowtation, probably fine with a low GTOW (only two pax).

USMCFLYR 09-03-2021 11:03 AM

Not what they commonly call 'slowtations' IME and they operate C-680s out of there too....but I bet you end up finding some procedural errors out of this one.

rickair7777 09-03-2021 02:40 PM


Originally Posted by USMCFLYR (Post 3289980)
Not what they commonly call 'slowtations' IME and they operate C-680s out of there too....but I bet you end up finding some procedural errors out of this one.

Yeah, I meant it's in the realm of bizjets designed to operate out of smaller fields so as to open up convenient access to more locations.

rickair7777 09-04-2021 07:22 PM

Bizarre. JB makes a solid case that the brakes were applied throughout the TO roll. Not the parking brake, but anti-skid and the skid marks show it...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmWltLbCLOI

2StgTurbine 09-04-2021 10:20 PM

While short, a 560XL can takeoff from that runway. It's a straight wing jet. That airport has (or had) a 135 jet operator out of there. The brake marks during the takeoff roll seem very similar to the 560XL crash in Oroville, CA in 2019. It also had skid marks on the runway.

TiredSoul 09-05-2021 12:54 AM

3665’ runway under the 60% rule gives 2200’
Quick online search on 560 performance figures shows numbers that are significantly higher but those are probably all MTOW and MLW.
In any case this was likely a Part 91 operation?

TiredSoul 09-05-2021 03:34 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3290604)
Bizarre. JB makes a solid case that the brakes were applied throughout the TO roll. Not the parking brake, but anti-skid and the skid marks show it...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmWltLbCLOI

Edit feature timed out on my previous post.
Watching the YT video I wonder if they had a pax sit right seat for the take off.
In light GA aircraft I would always brief “feet pulled back flat on the floor” where I can see them until we’re at altitude.
This for first time flyers or sight seeing or introduction flights.
Its hard to believe a professional crew would have their feet on the brakes without communicating.
Or was this one career pilot and a random day rate stranger on the right seat?

rickair7777 09-05-2021 08:22 AM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3290679)
Edit feature timed out on my previous post.
Watching the YT video I wonder if they had a pax sit right seat for the take off.
In light GA aircraft I would always brief “feet pulled back flat on the floor” where I can see them until we’re at altitude.
This for first time flyers or sight seeing or introduction flights.
Its hard to believe a professional crew would have their feet on the brakes without communicating.
Or was this one career pilot and a random day rate stranger on the right seat?

My understanding is that the crew were two older, experienced pros. Bizarre.

And even a 250 CPL would know not to ride the brakes.

But they'll probably know who was in which seat by now.

rickair7777 09-05-2021 08:23 AM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3290660)
3665’ runway under the 60% rule gives 2200’
Quick online search on 560 performance figures shows numbers that are significantly higher but those are probably all MTOW and MLW.
In any case this was likely a Part 91 operation?

Yes, short flight and only two out of nine possible pax seats filled so likely well below MGTOW.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands