Will NTSB EVER release the report?
05-02-2022, 07:59 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 414
Just like this incident
ASN Aircraft accident Airbus A321-231 (WL) N114NN New York-John F. Kennedy International Airport, NY (JFK) (aviation-safety.net)
Says investigation is "ongoing" but it has been strangely omitted from the NTSB database.
There is an FAA incident database that has a blurb saying the FAA determined it was pilot error, but the NTSB strangely quiet.
ASN Aircraft accident Airbus A321-231 (WL) N114NN New York-John F. Kennedy International Airport, NY (JFK) (aviation-safety.net)
Says investigation is "ongoing" but it has been strangely omitted from the NTSB database.
There is an FAA incident database that has a blurb saying the FAA determined it was pilot error, but the NTSB strangely quiet.
05-02-2022, 08:50 AM
#5
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,816
https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/a...port/99240/pdf
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
05-02-2022, 10:18 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/a...port/99240/pdf
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
Go look at the list of incidents for April 2019, this incident is not listed. Try to look up this tail number in the NTSB database… nothing. Why is this not listed when so many other minor incidents are?
05-02-2022, 11:18 AM
#7
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 36,734
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/a...port/99240/pdf
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
The NTSB preliminary states that the NTSB did not travel to the site.
Originally Posted by Texasbound
so? It’s common for the NTSB not to travel to the site. Guess what is not common!
Go look at the list of incidents for April 2019, this incident is not listed. Try to look up this tail number in the NTSB database… nothing. Why is this not listed when so many other minor incidents are?
Go look at the list of incidents for April 2019, this incident is not listed. Try to look up this tail number in the NTSB database… nothing. Why is this not listed when so many other minor incidents are?
That seems highly irregular for a 121 accident involving an off-runway landing (ie crash)?
My tin-foil is now starting to tingle a little bit with national security vibes.
05-02-2022, 01:56 PM
#9
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 36,734
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
Oh good, more conspiracy bull****.
The NTSB prelim cites the lead investigator by name. One could always contact him directly, if one is truly worried the sky may fall.
The NTSB prelim cites the lead investigator by name. One could always contact him directly, if one is truly worried the sky may fall.
Still odd that NTSB would investigate what looks like a 121 hull loss without a site visit.
05-02-2022, 03:37 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by rickair7777
I was joking, if you hadn't noticed by now I'm not prone to that sort of thing.
Still odd that NTSB would investigate what looks like a 121 hull loss without a site visit.
Still odd that NTSB would investigate what looks like a 121 hull loss without a site visit.
Oh, and I think you are talking about the other incident or mixing the 2 up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfaromeo
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
01-18-2009 08:14 PM
