Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Another "near miss" at AUS >

Another "near miss" at AUS

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Another "near miss" at AUS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2023, 07:57 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Wind checker
Posts: 763
Default

FDX presumably shooting a CATIII coupled in that weather (don’t know for sure if that’s the case). When does AUS twr take responsibility for protecting the ILS signal? If FDX is at three miles on a coupled approach (less than 1000’ AGL), seems a little aggressive to clear another for takeoff. I don’t even think AUS tower has the runway in sight during that vis.
hvydvr is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 07:59 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
Why would a controller clear an aircraft for takeoff during CATIII operations (600 RVR lowest reported) when an arriving aircraft is at 3 miles? The approach fix is at 3.2 miles.

Second, why would the Southwest jet accept a takeoff clearance this close during these conditions? Isn't the ILS Critical Area supposed to be sterile for arriving aircraft approach fix to landing?
FedEx is the hero here. Both calling the SWA abort and going around. Great situational awareness understanding if SWA took off during their go around it could be bad.
pangolin is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 08:06 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
FedEx is the hero here. Both calling the SWA abort and going around. Great situational awareness understanding if SWA took off during their go around it could be bad.
Southwest did takeoff. They did not abort. According to some online who have analyzed ADS-B data (understanding that the data can be erroneous or misleading), they were within 75' vertically of each other.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 08:15 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
FedEx called the SWA abort. Awesome SA from
FedEx. If SWA had taken off the FedEx go around would have been interesting. FedEx saved this all the way.
SWA did take off…
1Taco is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 08:41 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
FedEx called the SWA abort. Awesome SA from
FedEx. If SWA had taken off the FedEx go around would have been interesting. FedEx saved this all the way.
Southwest DID takeoff Hero!
Desdi is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 08:46 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,077
Default

It takes SWA a full min to start rolling after getting TO Clearence? Knowing they had a heavy short final. If they would of taken off at a reasonable time after getting the Clearence then shouldn't of been an issue.

But obviously we all can sit here and play backseat pilot.
Zerosilver84 is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 09:19 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,605
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
Why would a controller clear an aircraft for takeoff during CATIII operations (600 RVR lowest reported) when an arriving aircraft is at 3 miles? The approach fix is at 3.2 miles.

Second, why would the Southwest jet accept a takeoff clearance this close during these conditions? Isn't the ILS Critical Area supposed to be sterile for arriving aircraft approach fix to landing?
Better question……why did the SWA crew dick around so long after getting cleared to roll? They’re the ones who screwed up.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 09:23 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,121
Default

Seems like more of a controller issue.

He didn’t tell FedEx “traffic will depart prior to your arrival”, FedEx had to tactfully prompt him for it when they heard the SWA TO clearance.

He might have missed some minimum separation standards when SWA took longer to TO than he expected. Good job on the FedEx GA decision.

NTSB will figure it out.

Last edited by DeltaboundRedux; 02-05-2023 at 09:39 AM.
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 09:34 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Zerosilver84 View Post
It takes SWA a full min to start rolling after getting TO Clearence? Knowing they had a heavy short final. If they would of taken off at a reasonable time after getting the Clearence then shouldn't of been an issue.

But obviously we all can sit here and play backseat pilot.
especially in low RVR conditions after de-icing, it’s totally reasonable for 60s to elapse before rolling.
OOfff is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 09:58 AM
  #20  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,467
Default

I wonder if SWA was in a hurry to meet a holdover time? Weather was FZFG at the time.
dera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firstmob
Delta
60
12-18-2023 12:11 PM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
3
05-21-2008 12:15 PM
Runner
Major
2
02-20-2008 02:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices