Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Another "near miss" at AUS >

Another "near miss" at AUS

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Another "near miss" at AUS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2023, 11:31 AM
  #31  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,021
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Well, good for you.

Glad it’s always worked out, FOR YOU.
If your'e doing a 30 second pre-takeoff run for nacelle thermal anti-ice, where else do you do that run? That thirty second run to warm the nacelles is best done just prior to brake release, and should be coordinated with the tower. There is no indication of a run-up requested or done here, however.

No such request was heard on the audio, and a crew would not/should not do a run on the runway without clearing that with the tower, first.

It's clear that the southwest flight shouldn't have been released with the FedEx flight on a Cat III. It sounds, from the audio, like ATC was pushing runway utilization as tight as they could, which is setting up for something like this to occur.

A call from an airplane going around should not be to the aircraft taking off to abort (reject: it's a Boeing). That's not a call to be made by the aircraft initiating a missed approach, and certainly not a call I'm aware of any training department or organization using as a standard. The only person who should have called to reject the takeoff with Southwest is one of two in the cockpit; otherwise the tower controller might have cancelled clearance, but certainly should not call for an "abort." The pilot of the FedEx airplane shouldn't be calling "abort," either. Fly the airplane you're in, not the other guy's aircraft.

Better to go missed earlier than later, in this case, and they did.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 12:16 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 235
Default

Poor SA and ADM by the WN crew. They requested — and then accepted!!!— the takeoff clearance. Glad I’m not that CA. He/She will be in some VERY hot water for this.
game is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 12:30 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
If your'e doing a 30 second pre-takeoff run for nacelle thermal anti-ice, where else do you do that run? That thirty second run to warm the nacelles is best done just prior to brake release, and should be coordinated with the tower. There is no indication of a run-up requested or done here, however.

No such request was heard on the audio, and a crew would not/should not do a run on the runway without clearing that with the tower, first.

It's clear that the southwest flight shouldn't have been released with the FedEx flight on a Cat III. It sounds, from the audio, like ATC was pushing runway utilization as tight as they could, which is setting up for something like this to occur.

A call from an airplane going around should not be to the aircraft taking off to abort (reject: it's a Boeing). That's not a call to be made by the aircraft initiating a missed approach, and certainly not a call I'm aware of any training department or organization using as a standard. The only person who should have called to reject the takeoff with Southwest is one of two in the cockpit; otherwise the tower controller might have cancelled clearance, but certainly should not call for an "abort." The pilot of the FedEx airplane shouldn't be calling "abort," either. Fly the airplane you're in, not the other guy's aircraft.

Better to go missed earlier than later, in this case, and they did.
You obviously haven’t RTFT…..

​​​​​……..no reason to quote me in one of your typical all knowing/omniscient diatribes…..

Also, good job on being Judgy McJudgerstein on the FedEx crews actions, well done sir!!!!!
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 12:53 PM
  #34  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,021
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
You obviously haven’t RTFT…..

​​​​​……..no reason to quote me in one of your typical all knowing/omniscient diatribes…..

Also, good job on being Judgy McJudgerstein on the FedEx crews actions, well done sir!!!!!
I don't know what "RTFT" is, as I don't speak rubber-bone teenager, but I quoted you because you said something stupid, which merited comment. If you don't wish to be quoted speaking stupidity, then grow a brain or remain silent.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 12:59 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
I don't know what "RTFT" is, as I don't speak rubber-bone teenager, but I quoted you because you said something stupid, which merited comment. If you don't wish to be quoted speaking stupidity, then grow a brain or remain silent.
Actually, the poster making the comment asking if they were doing an engine run seemed like he said “something stupid”, but, whatever….

And maybe take some of your own advice?
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 02:25 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Tell you one thing. Push them up together when the pavement’s not dry.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 02:39 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude View Post
"AUS tower let me know when you're ready, stby for possible controller deviation, I have a number for you."
Or you could say "mark tape"
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 04:05 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by game View Post
Poor SA and ADM by the WN crew. They requested — and then accepted!!!— the takeoff clearance. Glad I’m not that CA. He/She will be in some VERY hot water for this.
There was one trigger for them. I’ve refused a takeoff clearance when it’s ifr and someone is on the approach. They were told about the heavy. I do not think they delayed on the runway. Takeoff if those conditions can take a minute.
pangolin is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 04:12 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drywhitetoast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: Sitting
Posts: 500
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
There was one trigger for them. I’ve refused a takeoff clearance when it’s ifr and someone is on the approach. They were told about the heavy. I do not think they delayed on the runway. Takeoff if those conditions can take a minute.
I agree. The hold short line is a quite a ways back from the actual runway.
drywhitetoast is offline  
Old 02-05-2023, 04:28 PM
  #40  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer View Post
Sounds like a couple of people asleep at the wheel, FedEx not being one of them.
SouthWest should have never been given a clearance and they should have not accepted one either.
As far as the ‘abort’ call, what’s next? Blaming FedEx for not initiating a go-around earlier?
I find it somewhat curious how laid back the TWR controller sounds through all of this.
TiredSoul is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firstmob
Delta
60
12-18-2023 12:11 PM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
3
05-21-2008 12:15 PM
Runner
Major
2
02-20-2008 02:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices